Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Joe" wrote in message
om... Worst president in history? (The following appeared in the Durham, NC local paper as a letter to the editor. Please forward to all on your list as this will put things in perspective ![]() Bob Crantz wrote: I like your analysis. It's not "his" analysis. It's just cut and pasted crap that's been circulating on the internet and that some fool of a newspaper editor in North Carolina was gullible enough to print. One word of advice: anytime you see a message that says "please forward this to everybody", don't. It's invariably a load of BS. -- // Walt // // There is no Volkl Conspiracy |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe wrote:
Worst president in history? (The following appeared in the Durham, NC local paper as a letter to the editor. Actually, it did not. This is the first of several non-truthful statements in this post, I happen to live quite close to Durham NC and subscribe to the Durham Herald-Sun. .... Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims. FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. False. German U-boats attacked US vessels before we declared war Truman finished that war and started one in Korea. North Korea never attacked us. False. North Korea invaded South Korea and attacked U.S. Army occupation forces there. ... John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. False. Eisenhower started the U.S. involvement in the Viet Nam War which started alternately in 1946 or 1829 (from the Vietnamese point of view). Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. False. What short memories you "conservatives" have. You apparently don't remember shrieking about how Clinton was a traitor for putting U.S. troops under NATO or later U.N. command. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. False again. There was a brief period of time when it may have been possible that OBL coould have been captured in Sudan with full cooperation by the Sudanese. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions. Over 2,900 lives lost on 9/11. And is currently being ignored by the Bush Administration. In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, Which two? rushed the Taliban, "rushed"? Has he been giving them methyl poppers? In any event the Taliban is still a potent force in Afghanistan and will almost certainly be part of any democratic coalition gov't there. ... crippled al-Qaida, Other than Bush campaign advertising, what evidence do you have for this? put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, That is the U.N.'s doing, not Bush's. ... Iran and North Korea False. There are no "nuclear inspectors" in Iran or North Korea, let alone U.S. ones. Worst president in history? Come on! IMHO he's in the running for it. So far, his "supporters" have to lie like rugs to come up with any positive accomplishments (see above). In the mean time, he has run up a tremendous debt, mostly to shovel money at the military contractors who form the backbone of his "new age" army, who commit war crimes and are unaccountable. He has weakend the U.S. military by commiting a huge force (which is nonetheless still not large enough to pacify the occupied zone) to an operation which does nothing at all to increase U.S. security (let me remind you that Iraq had no connection to the Sept 11th terrorists), and spent tremendous military appropriations on this operation which has forced our military to cut spending on other very important programs. Bush & Cheney have turned most of the long standing and staunch U.S. allies into uneasy barely cooperative nations or outright enemies. And that's just "the war on terror" which is really not about terrorism but politics. Do you want to look at what Bush & Cheney have done for the economy, the environment, education, etc etc? Our military is GREAT! PASS IT ON. I agree. But it certainly none of Bush & Cheney's doing. Regards Doug King |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 May 2004 10:23:22 -0400, DSK wrote:
Joe wrote: Worst president in history? (The following appeared in the Durham, NC local paper as a letter to the editor. Actually, it did not. This is the first of several non-truthful statements in this post, I happen to live quite close to Durham NC and subscribe to the Durham Herald-Sun. Funny how these sorts of articles always seem to lack attribution ![]() I would have thought it has more the look of a South Carolina publication, perhaps the Bob Jones University school paper. In any event, I actually prefer it when the right wing propaganda folks spell out their "reasoning" for their positions. It becomes so much easier to see things in perspective, i.e. they are the pied pipers to the ignorant. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Joe" wrote
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. .... One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in US. history. Let's clear up one point: President Bush didn't start the war on terror. Try getting your wars straight. The WOT has nothing to do with the war in Iraq. FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. What do you call sinking US flagged ships? Moreover, Hitler promptly declared war on us right after the attack. Truman .... started one in Korea. North Korea never attacked us. Did you flunk history 101? North Korea attacked US troops that had been stationed in the south since WW2. John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. Sorry, but JFK's "whiz kids" turned Vietnam into a quagmire. Clinton went to war in Bosnia .... OK, let me get this straight. Bush has us bogged down in a country that never attacked us just like JFK and his whiz kids did. In addition, he has turned Clintoon's budget surplus into the biggesr deficit in history and unconstitutionally locked people up by declaring them enemies of the state, just like Stalik used to do, and now says LEOs can seize yachts without due process, not to mention robbing funds from harbor and road maintenance to fund his war. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
felton wrote:
... In any event, I actually prefer it when the right wing propaganda folks spell out their "reasoning" for their positions. It becomes so much easier to see things in perspective, i.e. they are the pied pipers to the ignorant. Hey! excellent turn of phrase... "pied piper to the ignorant"... DSK |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote:
Joe wrote: Worst president in history? (The following appeared in the Durham, NC local paper as a letter to the editor. Actually, it did not. This is the first of several non-truthful statements in this post, I happen to live quite close to Durham NC and subscribe to the Durham Herald-Sun. Indeed. A Lexis-nexis search turns up empty for the Durham Herald-Sun. But it does turn up two hits: The Herald (Rock Hill, S.C.), March 14, 2004 Saturday State Times/Morning Advocate (Baton Rouge, Louisiana), April 10, 2004 While this bogus astroturf letter made it's way into two obscure small newspapers, it was not printed by the "Durham, NC local paper" as claimed. Like the rest of the piece, it's loosely based on what might be charitably be called "facts", but misses the [ob-sailing] boat entirely when it comes to the truth. I guess if you're stupid enough to mistake Rock Hill, South Carolina for Durham, North Carolina, you'll swallow the rest of the ahistorical crap contained within. IOW, just another internet hoax reeling in a bunch of suckers who'll believe *anything*. How many suckers? Just look at this: http://makeashorterlink.com/?X21921258 (BTW - good job debunking the rest of it, Doug. You have much more patience than I.) -- //-Walt // // There's a village in Texas that's missing its idiot. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe wrote:
Worst president in history? Your own arguments prove that Bush is the worst president ever. FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. [snip] Truman finished that war and started one in Korea. North Korea never attacked us. [snip] John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia never attacked us. Bush went to war in Iraq. Iraq never attacked the US. All of your other quotes have already been proved wrong. So the only president who is an idiot by *your* definition, is GWB. Regards Donal -- Regards Donal -- |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walt wrote:
I guess if you're stupid enough to mistake Rock Hill, South Carolina for Durham, North Carolina, you'll swallow the rest of the ahistorical crap contained within. I'm a little flattered that somebody thought "Durham, NC" was somehow more impressive than Rock Hill, SC. But it's still nonsense. One small town newspaper I used to read had regular letters to the editor from two citizens carrying on a public argument about UFOs. The capper was when one of them claimed that UFOs were responsible for her pet's incontinence. Why doesn't somebody pop up quoting this, and claiming that it somehow proves Bush & Cheney are doing a great job? (BTW - good job debunking the rest of it, Doug. You have much more patience than I.) Actually it was canned. I first saw that same bushwa about 2 weeks ago and wrote it then, and pulled it up from the 'sent' folder. Three clicks is all it took! I have the bad luck to work with a bunch of dittoheads. Only a few of them are really serious but they much better by now than to try and argue with me. I think these fascist whacko media types affect some people's brains just like PCP. REgards Doug King |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote:
Walt wrote: I guess if you're stupid enough to mistake Rock Hill, South Carolina for Durham, North Carolina, you'll swallow the rest of the ahistorical crap contained within. I'm a little flattered that somebody thought "Durham, NC" was somehow more impressive than Rock Hill, SC. Well, I've at least heard of Durham, and while it's not a big city, I doubt that the editor of the newspaper is so glad to get any letters at all that he'll print *anything*. Rock Hill is... well... not so large. Not that there's anything wrong with small towns, it's just that the local papers can't afford to be as picky about what letters they print. But it's still nonsense. One small town newspaper I used to read had regular letters to the editor from two citizens carrying on a public argument about UFOs. The capper was when one of them claimed that UFOs were responsible for her pet's incontinence. What's far fetched about that? I know I'd be incontinent if I saw a UFO. Wouldn't anybody? Why doesn't somebody pop up quoting this, and claiming that it somehow proves Bush & Cheney are doing a great job? Isn't it obvious? Why do you hate America, Doug? (BTW - good job debunking the rest of it, Doug. You have much more patience than I.) Actually it was canned. I first saw that same bushwa about 2 weeks ago and wrote it then, and pulled it up from the 'sent' folder. Three clicks is all it took! At least you're plagiarizing yourself, not just mindlessly passing along whatever nonsense shows up in your in-box. -- //-Walt // // http://cagle.slate.msn.com/working/040514/matson.gif |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walt wrote:
Well, I've at least heard of Durham, and while it's not a big city, I doubt that the editor of the newspaper is so glad to get any letters at all that he'll print *anything*. Rock Hill is... well... not so large. Not that there's anything wrong with small towns, it's just that the local papers can't afford to be as picky about what letters they print. I dunno, the papers here will print a wide range of whacko stuff, but a lot of it is about college basketball. The Durham and Raleigh papers both have a conservative slant (more accurately, the Durham Herald-Sun is merely pro-Bush/Cheney, the Raleigh N&O is actually conservative). Not too long ago they were publishing a series of letters from a Bush/Cheney cheerleader who seems to think that Clinton is still in power, in some murky underworld way. Among other things, this person has claimed that not one Iraqi or Afghan citizen has been harmed by U.S. military action, whereas Clinton's nefarious scheming has killed millions of Americans. I wish I were making this up. But it's still nonsense. One small town newspaper I used to read had regular letters to the editor from two citizens carrying on a public argument about UFOs. The capper was when one of them claimed that UFOs were responsible for her pet's incontinence. What's far fetched about that? I know I'd be incontinent if I saw a UFO. Wouldn't anybody? Did I say it was farfetched? It was the *truth*, man! BTW small town gossip... one of the UFOers kids was the towns biggest drug dealer... I always wondered if it was cause & effect, and if so, which one was the cause and which was the effect... DSK |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(OT) Four successive Presidents have picked Richard Clarke to defend America against terrorists | General | |||
( ot ) Presidents on Politics | General | |||
Bush Resume | ASA |