Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Navigator wrote:
... Cross cut spinnakers largely disappeared years ago Really? That must be why the current North and Sobstad runners on Lightnings (and a few other one designs I believe) are all cross cut. If you look at the panels on the spinnaker you've been criticizing for a week, you'd see plainly that it is cross cut. DSK |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() DSK wrote: Navigator wrote: ... Cross cut spinnakers largely disappeared years ago Really? That must be why the current North and Sobstad runners on Lightnings (and a few other one designs I believe) are all cross cut. If you look at the panels on the spinnaker you've been criticizing for a week, you'd see plainly that it is cross cut. I said 'largely' and even gave a URL (read the post) to all cross cut spins Doug. So what are you trying to get at, are you saying that radial cuts are not the most common running spinnaker by far? Cheers |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Navigator wrote:
...So what are you trying to get at Can you not read plain English? DSK |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() DSK wrote: Navigator wrote: ...So what are you trying to get at Can you not read plain English? I don't think you should question my knowlege or command of English Doug. Perhaps you should try to think about what you posted and the context of my simple question before you fly off the handle further. Cheers |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Navigator wrote:
I don't think you should question my knowlege or command of English Doug. Why? You seem unable to understand simple sentences. ... Perhaps you should try to think about what you posted and the context of my simple question before you fly off the handle further. I have not flown off the handle, just pointing out that what I posted was not complex nor difficult to understand, so why don't you grasp it? DSK |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() DSK wrote: Navigator wrote: I don't think you should question my knowlege or command of English Doug. Why? You seem unable to understand simple sentences. ... Perhaps you should try to think about what you posted and the context of my simple question before you fly off the handle further. I have not flown off the handle, just pointing out that what I posted was not complex nor difficult to understand, so why don't you grasp it? Do you know what this symbol - ? - means as in "Are you talking about a radial cut?" ??? Cheers |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Navigator wrote:
Do you know what this symbol - ? - means as in "Are you talking about a radial cut?" ??? Do you know what this symbol means - . - as in "If I meant a radial cut, I'd have said 'radial cut' instead of 'cross cut'. Period. Very simple English, why can you not understand? DSK |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Checking up on Doug's clear assertion (below) I find that Doug is not
correct. North say their fastest spinnaker is a radial and that 2003 Lightning world champions use them. http://www.northsailsod.com/class/li...lightning.html "For top performance and durability, we offer the R-2 and the RC-1 spinnakers. Both spinnakers are fill radial with fully glued seams for smoothness and resistance to snags. Both are built from AirX fabric." Tell me Doug, why did you say that they were cross cut? Are you confused or BSing? Are you now going to take my spinnaker advice and get a faster radial sail? Cheers DSK wrote: Really? That must be why the current North and Sobstad runners on Lightnings (and a few other one designs I believe) are all cross cut. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Navigator wrote:
Checking up on Doug's clear assertion (below) I find that Doug is not correct. North say their fastest spinnaker is a radial and that 2003 Lightning world champions use them. http://www.northsailsod.com/class/li...lightning.html "For top performance and durability, we offer the R-2 and the RC-1 spinnakers. Both spinnakers are fill radial with fully glued seams for smoothness and resistance to snags. Both are built from AirX fabric." Please quote the part that says specifically which spinnakers the 2003 World (or for that matter the 2003 NA) champs use. In fact it says specifically that the R-2 and RC-1 are *reaching* spinnakers. You know the difference between reaching and running, yes? If you looked further down that same page you find the Bruin and another cross cut runner. "The Bruin has long been recognized for the downwind performer that it is. Slightly flatter in the middle for 1998, the Bruim is much more an all-around performer with little sacrifice to its proven broad reaching and running performance." Gee, you must be wetting your pants thinking that you've *finally* shown me wrong, for once. Of course, you almost were a man and admitted your mistake about those big old wooden ships, but now that's all behind you, eh? Back to the same old bluff & bluster for Navvie! Fresh Breezes (to them wot kin use 'em)- Doug King |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() DSK wrote: Navigator wrote: Checking up on Doug's clear assertion (below) I find that Doug is not correct. North say their fastest spinnaker is a radial and that 2003 Lightning world champions use them. http://www.northsailsod.com/class/li...lightning.html "For top performance and durability, we offer the R-2 and the RC-1 spinnakers. Both spinnakers are fill radial with fully glued seams for smoothness and resistance to snags. Both are built from AirX fabric." Back to the same old bluff & bluster for Doug King |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|