Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Forget 18 knots, at least fully loaded with the ballast tank full, that is. But
it still does really well with a 50 hp motor. And it really sails well, too. And for that reason, I say get a 9 hp motor only. The boat is a better sailing vessel than it is a speed boat and it should be appreciated for that. It's funny, my wife and I now sail a dinghy just about every weekend. We never got a motor for it, because that would have only ruined it. Now that we've learned to sail well (which we really didn't know how to do with our Mac), we have no need for a motor. I make this recommendation: if you've already ordered the boat with the 50 hp motor, get it and use it as you like, but don't consider it a bad move to remove it and switch to a 9 hp. The Veridican |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Holy smokes!
To the batpoles Robin! RB "Veridican" wrote in message ... Forget 18 knots, at least fully loaded with the ballast tank full, that is. But it still does really well with a 50 hp motor. And it really sails well, too. And for that reason, I say get a 9 hp motor only. The boat is a better sailing vessel than it is a speed boat and it should be appreciated for that. It's funny, my wife and I now sail a dinghy just about every weekend. We never got a motor for it, because that would have only ruined it. Now that we've learned to sail well (which we really didn't know how to do with our Mac), we have no need for a motor. I make this recommendation: if you've already ordered the boat with the 50 hp motor, get it and use it as you like, but don't consider it a bad move to remove it and switch to a 9 hp. The Veridican |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Veridican wrote: Forget 18 knots, at least fully loaded with the ballast tank full, that is. But it still does really well with a 50 hp motor. And it really sails well, too. And for that reason, I say get a 9 hp motor only. The boat is a better sailing vessel than it is a speed boat and it should be appreciated for that. It's funny, my wife and I now sail a dinghy just about every weekend. We never got a motor for it, because that would have only ruined it. Now that we've learned to sail well (which we really didn't know how to do with our Mac), we have no need for a motor. I make this recommendation: if you've already ordered the boat with the 50 hp motor, get it and use it as you like, but don't consider it a bad move to remove it and switch to a 9 hp. The Veridican Becuase of the weight issue, I'm getting a 50 hp two-stroke engine that is relatively lightweight (about 200 pounds). I don't think this will be that significant a factor in its sailing characteristics. (Of course, some on this ng think that the Mac doesn't sail under any conditions. -If that's the case, I might as well put on the larger motor and enjoy motoring around.) Jim |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
the Mac doesn't sail under any conditions.
-If that's the case, I might as well put on the larger motor and enjoy motoring around.) Jim put a 75 hp engine on the back, a bunch of lead in the bow and it still won't go 22 mph. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Becuase of the weight issue, I'm getting a 50 hp two-stroke engine that
is relatively lightweight (about 200 pounds). I don't think this will be that significant a factor in its sailing characteristics. (Of course, some on this ng think that the Mac doesn't sail under any conditions. -If that's the case, I might as well put on the larger motor and enjoy motoring around.) Jim That's what we had (the Merc 50 hp two stroke). But the boat is balanced with or without it, and you're right 200 lbs on a 3000 pound boat just doesn't matter. I think you'll find the Mac sails pretty good. It's got a more narrow beam than some boats and this makes it faster, in my opinion. People on here don't like the Mac because they have to defend their own choice of boat. They like to talk about storms and heavy seas. Yesterday the wind was blowing about 30 mph and the sea was all white caps and dust and debrie was blowing everywhere. I didn't like driving in my car, much less would I have liked sailing. I don't sail when there are small craft advisories. It's not that I'm afraid to (well, maybe I am); it's more that I don't want to rig my boat in that wind and try to get it away from the dock. My boat could have handled it. A Mac can handle it. It's not like they're going to sink. But no boats go out when the wind is like that. That's just the reality of the situation. If you're in your Mac sailing the FL keys and 40 knot winds start to kick up; You're going to do what everyone else does: reef, and head for a bay or cove until it passes. Or you're going to ride it out; either way, you're boat's going to be just fine. Do they really think that in wind and waves, the Mac is going to splinter into fiberglass pieces? If you wanted to sail the boat around the world, you could do it. The boat would be just fine. But it's 26 feet. You can't sail from the Galapagose Islands to Tahiti, because you can't carry enough food or water for that trip. The Mac is a costal cruiser not because of it's "strength" but because if it's size. I don't care what kind of boat a person has--if it's 26 feet long, it can only cary so much food an water. The Veridican |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Cate" wrote I might as well put on the larger motor and enjoy motoring around. The Mac credo. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Veridican" wrote I don't sail when there are small craft advisories. It's not that I'm afraid to (well, maybe I am); it's more that I don't want to rig my boat in that wind and try to get it away from the dock. My boat could have handled it. Pussy! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Veridican" wrote
If you wanted to sail the boat around the world, you could do it. The boat would be just fine. But it's 26 feet. You can't sail from the Galapagose Islands to Tahiti, because you can't carry enough food or water for that trip. The Mac is a costal cruiser not because of it's "strength" but because if it's size. I don't care what kind of boat a person has--if it's 26 feet long, it can only cary so much food an water. Hence the need for the USCG. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Veridican wrote:
Becuase of the weight issue, I'm getting a 50 hp two-stroke engine that is relatively lightweight (about 200 pounds). I don't think this will be that significant a factor in its sailing characteristics. (Of course, some on this ng think that the Mac doesn't sail under any conditions. -If that's the case, I might as well put on the larger motor and enjoy motoring around.) Jim That's what we had (the Merc 50 hp two stroke). But the boat is balanced with or without it, and you're right 200 lbs on a 3000 pound boat just doesn't matter. You must be kidding. I've got a boat that's a similar length and weighs around 5000 lb., putting 200 lb. on the stern sure a **** makes a big difference. If you can't feel and see it on a 3000 lb boat you must blind, deaf, and numb from the neck down, (from the neck up I'll leave for others to speculate about). Cheers Marty |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think you're right. Go for the 50hp. You'll have a higher
resale value. You can sell it more easily to anyone who doesn't have a clue about sailing. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Veridican wrote: Forget 18 knots, at least fully loaded with the ballast tank full, that is. But it still does really well with a 50 hp motor. And it really sails well, too. And for that reason, I say get a 9 hp motor only. The boat is a better sailing vessel than it is a speed boat and it should be appreciated for that. It's funny, my wife and I now sail a dinghy just about every weekend. We never got a motor for it, because that would have only ruined it. Now that we've learned to sail well (which we really didn't know how to do with our Mac), we have no need for a motor. I make this recommendation: if you've already ordered the boat with the 50 hp motor, get it and use it as you like, but don't consider it a bad move to remove it and switch to a 9 hp. The Veridican Becuase of the weight issue, I'm getting a 50 hp two-stroke engine that is relatively lightweight (about 200 pounds). I don't think this will be that significant a factor in its sailing characteristics. (Of course, some on this ng think that the Mac doesn't sail under any conditions. -If that's the case, I might as well put on the larger motor and enjoy motoring around.) Jim |