Wood I lie?

Scotty

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA.....
It's just too true!

CM

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
|
| "Jim Cate" wrote
|
| I might as well put on the larger motor and enjoy
| motoring around.
|
|
| The Mac credo.
|

I think you're right. Go for the 50hp. You'll have a higher
resale value. You can sell it more easily to anyone who
doesn't have a clue about sailing.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Jim Cate" wrote in message
...


Veridican wrote:

Forget 18 knots, at least fully loaded with the ballast tank full, that
is. But
it still does really well with a 50 hp motor. And it really sails well,
too.
And for that reason, I say get a 9 hp motor only. The boat is a better
sailing
vessel than it is a speed boat and it should be appreciated for that.

It's funny, my wife and I now sail a dinghy just about every weekend. We
never
got a motor for it, because that would have only ruined it. Now that
we've
learned to sail well (which we really didn't know how to do with our
Mac), we
have no need for a motor.

I make this recommendation: if you've already ordered the boat with the
50 hp
motor, get it and use it as you like, but don't consider it a bad move
to
remove it and switch to a 9 hp.

The Veridican

Becuase of the weight issue, I'm getting a 50 hp two-stroke engine that
is relatively lightweight (about 200 pounds). I don't think this will
be that significant a factor in its sailing characteristics. (Of course,
some on this ng think that the Mac doesn't sail under any conditions.
-If that's the case, I might as well put on the larger motor and enjoy
motoring around.)

Jim