![]() |
The Mac and Speed
|
The Mac and Speed
Jonathan Ganz wrote: Whatever you say you stupid ninny. Calm down Johnny. Get a grip on yourself! The Mac 26M is specifically designed to sail and motor with the 50-hp outboard. Ballast is distributed forward in the boat for longitudinal balance. Obviously, it isn't a Valiant 40, so if you intend to have four or five large adults in the cockpit in addition to the motor, you might want to re-distribute some of the load, move some heavier objects forward, or the like. It's interesting that you think a 200-lb. motor is going to simply ruin the sailing characteristics of a 26-ft boat SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED for it, yet you don't seem to have any problem with the much larger load of several large passengers sitting in the cockpit. - Why the concern about the motor itself? Think logic, and the basic laws of physics, Johnny. - And intellectual honesty. (What you're trying to do, of course, is maintain that the boat, with the motor, is fatally flawed because it can't achieve proper longitudinal balance for sailing. - It simply isn't so.) Jim |
The Mac and Speed
Sure thing... You're AN IDIOT. Go away MacBoy.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... bs deleted as usual |
The Mac and Speed
Keep trying.
wrote I tried to look at the Mac26m from your perspective, but I was unable to get my head that far up my ass. BB |
The Mac and Speed
wrote in message ... On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:27:12 -0500, Jim Cate wrote: I tried to look at the Mac26m from your perspective, but I was unable to get my head that far down my ass. Lessons for Scotty - Part 1. Regards Donal -- |
The Mac and Speed
yo-yo, you put 200# on one end of a boat you have to put 200# on the other end
of the boat to balance. makes for truly terrible performance in a chop. Whatever you say you stupid ninny. Calm down Johnny. Get a grip on yourself! The Mac 26M is specifically designed to sail and motor with the 50-hp outboard. Ballast is distributed forward in the boat for longitudinal balance. Obviously, it isn't a Valiant 40, so if you intend to have four or five large adults in the cockpit in addition to the motor, you might want to re-distribute some of the load, move some heavier objects forward, or the like. It's interesting that you think a 200-lb. motor is going to simply ruin the sailing characteristics of a 26-ft boat SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED for it, yet you don't seem to have any problem with the much larger load of several large passengers sitting in the cockpit. - Why the concern about the motor itself? Think logic, and the basic laws of physics, Johnny. - And intellectual honesty. (What you're trying to do, of course, is maintain that the boat, with the motor, is fatally flawed because it can't achieve proper longitudinal balance for sailing. - It simply isn't so.) Jim |
The Mac and Speed
JAXAshby wrote: yo-yo, you put 200# on one end of a boat you have to put 200# on the other end of the boat to balance. makes for truly terrible performance in a chop. Does this mean that if passengers and helmsman in the cockpit weigh 1,000 pounds, you have to bring an additional 1,000 pounds onboard and store it in the bow? No? Then why do you have add 200# on the "other end" to balance the motor? What's the difference between a little weight, added by the motor, and lots more weight added by the crew? The fact is that the boat is balanced for typical loads, which include the motor. Of course, it's a small boat, and as in any small boat, if you have an very heavy load in the aft end of the boat, you would probably sail better if you distributed the load somewhat. Jim Whatever you say you stupid ninny. Calm down Johnny. Get a grip on yourself! The Mac 26M is specifically designed to sail and motor with the 50-hp outboard. Ballast is distributed forward in the boat for longitudinal balance. Obviously, it isn't a Valiant 40, so if you intend to have four or five large adults in the cockpit in addition to the motor, you might want to re-distribute some of the load, move some heavier objects forward, or the like. It's interesting that you think a 200-lb. motor is going to simply ruin the sailing characteristics of a 26-ft boat SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED for it, yet you don't seem to have any problem with the much larger load of several large passengers sitting in the cockpit. - Why the concern about the motor itself? Think logic, and the basic laws of physics, Johnny. - And intellectual honesty. (What you're trying to do, of course, is maintain that the boat, with the motor, is fatally flawed because it can't achieve proper longitudinal balance for sailing. - It simply isn't so.) Jim |
The Mac and Speed
I think Scotty is willing to help out.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com wrote in message ... On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:27:12 -0500, Jim Cate wrote: Jonathan Ganz wrote: Whatever you say you stupid ninny. Calm down Johnny. Get a grip on yourself! The Mac 26M is specifically designed to sail and motor with the 50-hp outboard. Ballast is distributed forward in the boat for longitudinal balance. Obviously, it isn't a Valiant 40, so if you intend to have four or five large adults in the cockpit in addition to the motor, you might want to re-distribute some of the load, move some heavier objects forward, or the like. It's interesting that you think a 200-lb. motor is going to simply ruin the sailing characteristics of a 26-ft boat SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED for it, yet you don't seem to have any problem with the much larger load of several large passengers sitting in the cockpit. - Why the concern about the motor itself? Think logic, and the basic laws of physics, Johnny. - And intellectual honesty. (What you're trying to do, of course, is maintain that the boat, with the motor, is fatally flawed because it can't achieve proper longitudinal balance for sailing. - It simply isn't so.) Jim I tried to look at the Mac26m from your perspective, but I was unable to get my head that far up my ass. BB |
The Mac and Speed
Well, at least you don't have to worry about the weight of your
brain. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... JAXAshby wrote: yo-yo, you put 200# on one end of a boat you have to put 200# on the other end of the boat to balance. makes for truly terrible performance in a chop. Does this mean that if passengers and helmsman in the cockpit weigh 1,000 pounds, you have to bring an additional 1,000 pounds onboard and store it in the bow? No? Then why do you have add 200# on the "other end" to balance the motor? What's the difference between a little weight, added by the motor, and lots more weight added by the crew? The fact is that the boat is balanced for typical loads, which include the motor. Of course, it's a small boat, and as in any small boat, if you have an very heavy load in the aft end of the boat, you would probably sail better if you distributed the load somewhat. Jim Whatever you say you stupid ninny. Calm down Johnny. Get a grip on yourself! The Mac 26M is specifically designed to sail and motor with the 50-hp outboard. Ballast is distributed forward in the boat for longitudinal balance. Obviously, it isn't a Valiant 40, so if you intend to have four or five large adults in the cockpit in addition to the motor, you might want to re-distribute some of the load, move some heavier objects forward, or the like. It's interesting that you think a 200-lb. motor is going to simply ruin the sailing characteristics of a 26-ft boat SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED for it, yet you don't seem to have any problem with the much larger load of several large passengers sitting in the cockpit. - Why the concern about the motor itself? Think logic, and the basic laws of physics, Johnny. - And intellectual honesty. (What you're trying to do, of course, is maintain that the boat, with the motor, is fatally flawed because it can't achieve proper longitudinal balance for sailing. - It simply isn't so.) Jim |
The Mac and Speed
you sailing with boob****?
"Jim Cate" wrote Does this mean that if helmsman in the cockpit weigh 1,000 pounds, |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com