Horvy asked"=20
There is no boob lobby in America.

What about NOW?

Those wimmen have smaller boobs than you have....
--=20
katysails
s/v Chanteuse
Kirie Elite 32
http://katysails.tripod.com

"Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax
and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein

It really isn't the gun that is so bad. The bulletproof vest

BULLETPROOF VEST!???? Isn't that passive-defence? You must be one of those
pinko massachusetts homocrats I read about on President Bush's website.
Surely the real all american solution is just to get a BIGGER GUN than the
bad guy?

It really isn't the gun that is so bad. The bulletproof vest

Ric wrote:
BULLETPROOF VEST!???? Isn't that passive-defence? You must be one of those
pinko massachusetts homocrats I read about on President Bush's website.
Surely the real all american solution is just to get a BIGGER GUN than the
bad guy?

That's why SUVs are so popular... you can carry more & bigger guns.

Remember, when SUVs are outlawed, only outlaws will drive SUVs

DSK

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:59:03 +0100, "Ric" wrote:



It really isn't the gun that is so bad. The bulletproof vest

BULLETPROOF VEST!???? Isn't that passive-defence? You must be one of those
pinko massachusetts homocrats I read about on President Bush's website.
Surely the real all american solution is just to get a BIGGER GUN than the
bad guy?

Not quite...I live in Texas and I need something for protection while
I am reloading. My grandfather was a rancher who always carried two
handguns in his truck. I once asked him why he needed two. He
replied that if someone managed to take one away from him and stick it
up his ass, he needed another one to blow it out with

Never heard of them so I guess the answer is no. Censorship is amusing
in a way; one group want you to stop looking at/reading about sex and
the other about weapons, as a broad generalisation.

I manage to live very happily without a TV or radio and listen to music
on CD's. OTOH my book collection is eclectic.

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

I said he was "willing" to do it, not the gov't actually doing it,
so there's nothing to disagree about unless you think they
should be censored.

I don't want anyone or any viewpoint censored. I wouldn't mind
a reduction in volume for some, but that's about it. Only possible
exception would be spammers. :-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
. ..

Never heard of them so I guess the answer is no. Censorship is amusing
in a way; one group want you to stop looking at/reading about sex and
the other about weapons, as a broad generalisation.

I manage to live very happily without a TV or radio and listen to music
on CD's. OTOH my book collection is eclectic.

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

I said he was "willing" to do it, not the gov't actually doing it,
so there's nothing to disagree about unless you think they
should be censored.