I said he was "willing" to do it, not the gov't actually doing it,
so there's nothing to disagree about unless you think they
should be censored.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
. ..
In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

Hahah... well, that's pretty funny. We "don't like any censorship," but
you're quite willing to censor the Dixies.

Sorry, John, gotta disagree with you. A consumer boycott is not
censorship. AFAIK the US govt hasn't banned the Dixies' songs,
performances et al.

I boycott Greenpeace and their ilk because I think they're mainly
wrong, pretty wholly dishonest and becoming part of the problem. I'm
not calling for them to be banned, tho.

Peter Wiley

Never heard of them so I guess the answer is no. Censorship is amusing
in a way; one group want you to stop looking at/reading about sex and
the other about weapons, as a broad generalisation.

I manage to live very happily without a TV or radio and listen to music
on CD's. OTOH my book collection is eclectic.

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

I said he was "willing" to do it, not the gov't actually doing it,
so there's nothing to disagree about unless you think they
should be censored.

I don't want anyone or any viewpoint censored. I wouldn't mind
a reduction in volume for some, but that's about it. Only possible
exception would be spammers. :-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
. ..

Never heard of them so I guess the answer is no. Censorship is amusing
in a way; one group want you to stop looking at/reading about sex and
the other about weapons, as a broad generalisation.

I manage to live very happily without a TV or radio and listen to music
on CD's. OTOH my book collection is eclectic.

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

I said he was "willing" to do it, not the gov't actually doing it,
so there's nothing to disagree about unless you think they
should be censored.