Actually, you'd be the only one who understood it. I don't
troll as a general rule, and I'm not trolling now. The facts
are that he *is* obviously a racist and he's obviously trolling.
I'm far from PC. I'm not sure what you are.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
. ..

Well, John, I understood his explanation the first time. Looks to me
like you're simply trolling for the sake of it. Taking over Bob****'s
role perhaps?

Dave's quite right - the incidence of stupidity crosses all varieties
of skin colour, eye folds et al. What's your problem with that? You can
call him a racist, but you're just coming across as a PC facist. It's
boring.

PDW

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

So, backpeddle all you want, but the fact remains that you're the
racist. Nothing you have said so far would indicate differently.
Does this go along with being a republican or is it just your
predeliction?

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

Actually, you'd be the only one who understood it. I don't
troll as a general rule, and I'm not trolling now. The facts
are that he *is* obviously a racist and he's obviously trolling.
I'm far from PC. I'm not sure what you are.

Human.

PDW

Prove it.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
. ..
In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

Actually, you'd be the only one who understood it. I don't
troll as a general rule, and I'm not trolling now. The facts
are that he *is* obviously a racist and he's obviously trolling.
I'm far from PC. I'm not sure what you are.

Human.

PDW

1. Define acceptable proof.

2. Demonstrate why I should bother.

3. Stop being a Bob****.

PDW

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

Prove it.

1. Acceptable proof for whom? I don't really care.
2. Ummm... why would I care?
3. That's not possible. He has no peers.

You started this with calling me a facist.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
. ..

1. Define acceptable proof.

2. Demonstrate why I should bother.

3. Stop being a Bob****.

PDW

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

Prove it.

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

1. Acceptable proof for whom? I don't really care.

Why did you ask then? That's a rhetorical question BTW, I'm pretty sure
you were hoping I'd start trying to prove something to your
satisfaction so you could carp forever and try to get me running in
circles. Sorry, bad bait, not playing.

2. Ummm... why would I care?

Why ask in the first place?

3. That's not possible. He has no peers.

I'll give you that one.

You started this with calling me a facist.

Go re-read what I originally wrote. You were throwing the 'racist' tag
around pretty freely over what was a pretty throwaway remark by Dave
and refusing to bother reading what he was actually writing so in fact
you started it. Now you've got your knickers in a twist because someone
else expresses distaste for your monstering behaviour?

Get over it. Your attack on Dave and your attempt to paint him as a
racist (he may be, but not from his posting) has fizzled. Dave's thrown
the hook. Find something worthwhile to do. End of conversation. Feel
free to have the last word on this thread, I have better things to do
than bother to reply.

Peter Wiley

If you're only pretty sure, then that leaves a big gap in
your certain knowledge.

It was rhetorical?

I don't believe that "a pretty throw away remark" is
acceptable when one puts down an entire race.
Sorry, but it's a racist statement no matter how
"throw away" you want to call it.

Now I'm a monster??

I definitely think you should kf me RIGHT NOW.
HURRY UP.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
. ..
In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

1. Acceptable proof for whom? I don't really care.

Why did you ask then? That's a rhetorical question BTW, I'm pretty sure
you were hoping I'd start trying to prove something to your
satisfaction so you could carp forever and try to get me running in
circles. Sorry, bad bait, not playing.

2. Ummm... why would I care?

Why ask in the first place?

3. That's not possible. He has no peers.

I'll give you that one.

You started this with calling me a facist.

Go re-read what I originally wrote. You were throwing the 'racist' tag
around pretty freely over what was a pretty throwaway remark by Dave
and refusing to bother reading what he was actually writing so in fact
you started it. Now you've got your knickers in a twist because someone
else expresses distaste for your monstering behaviour?

Get over it. Your attack on Dave and your attempt to paint him as a
racist (he may be, but not from his posting) has fizzled. Dave's thrown
the hook. Find something worthwhile to do. End of conversation. Feel
free to have the last word on this thread, I have better things to do
than bother to reply.

Peter Wiley

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
. ..
End of conversation. Feel
free to have the last word on this thread, I have better things to do
than bother to reply.


Are you having your "monthly", Peter?



Regards


Donal
--