BoatBanter.com - So long, Folks!

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)

- ASA (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/)

- - So long, Folks! (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/19383-so-long-folks.html)

Jeff asked: As in "some people believe in evolution and others believe in creationism"?

katysails wrote:
Yes, and that some believe that creationism does not exclude evolutionism.

Sure, it would have been easy for God to have created the world so that
evolution is a valid scientific principle... maybe that means
'creationism' is a trap for people whose faith is not strong enough...

DSK

"Jeff Morris" wrote in message
...
"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Jeff Morris" wrote in message
As in "some people believe in evolution and others believe in
creationism"?

What do *you* believe, Jeff?

I believe that if there is a god, he wouldn't want us to be stupid. A god
that
could create our world by tossing out a "big bang" would be very
impressive.
The god described in Genesis is a cute metaphor for children and very
simple
people. Not that I don't like Genesis - Its by far my favorite piece of
literature - but to teach it as literal truth to anyone older than 6 years
is
abuse.

You might be right. However, when people suggest that we have managed to
evolve over a period of 600,000 years, then I just laugh.

Regards

Donal

--

Dave tries to explain his position:=20
How many legs does a pig have if you call its tail a leg?

Doesn't matter what you call the tail, or the leg, as long as it isn't =
crude or rude...

--=20
katysails
s/v Chanteuse
Kirie Elite 32
http://katysails.tripod.com

"Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax
and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein

200,000 years ago is the current guess. That's when a couple hundred women
walked out of sub-Saharan Africa to populate the world.

when people suggest that we have managed to
evolve over a period of 600,000 years, then I just laugh.

Regards

Donal

--

yeah. three.

That's when a couple hundred women
walked out of sub-Saharan Africa to populate the world.

There must have been a few smiling guys who went with them.

Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

No, this isn't satire. This is obnoxious language. Obviously, one
of your strong points.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:12:00 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
said:

It sure doesn't. Quite offensive, and a stupid thing to say.

Talk about not recognizing satire if it bit you in the ass....

Ah, but I forget. That's not one of your strong points.

Dave
S/V Good Fortune
CS27

You are truly an idiot and a racist (apparently). You seem to think
that calling someone an African American vs. a ****** somehow
obsolves you from the thought that went behind calling the person
a ****** in the first place. No intelligent person would ever call
someone a ******, unless you were living in the 1800s or earlier.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:33:00 -0500, "katysails"

said:

Doesn't matter what you call the tail, or the leg, as long as it isn't
crude or rude...

curmudgeonly discourse
Du'n matter what I call it even if somebody does thinks it's crude or
rude.
It's still the same old tail.

Having spent 50 years hearing that one must say Negro, not ******, one
must
say black, not Negro, one must say African-American, not black, one must
say
afro-American, not African-American, one may say ******, but only if he is
African-American etc., etc. I can only laugh when I hear someone making
much
of such nonsense. The only thing "correcting" such words does is to label
the person doing the tut-tutting as either a self-righteous fool, or
someone
with an irrepressible need to push his own agenda.

An yes, I did deliberately commit the horrible offense of using "his" to
mean "his or her," "his/her" or whatever flag-waving combination of words
is
current.
/curmudgeonly discourse

Dave
S/V Good Fortune
CS27

You might qualify for the sword through the neck trick with this statement.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Jeff asked: As in "some people believe in evolution and others believe
in creationism"?

katysails wrote:
Yes, and that some believe that creationism does not exclude
evolutionism.

Sure, it would have been easy for God to have created the world so that
evolution is a valid scientific principle... maybe that means
'creationism' is a trap for people whose faith is not strong enough...

DSK

Dave stated: someone
with an irrepressible need to push his own agenda.

It isn't an irrepresible need to push my agenda at all...I'm an HTR =
generalist and I work in a field where there is a lot of dicersity. =
Using derogatory terms that exist because of hatred spurns on that =
hatred. Why not just try t think of everyone as being a human being? =
Why label someone with a negative slang expression? Why demean yourself =
by demeaning others?

--=20
katysails
s/v Chanteuse
Kirie Elite 32
http://katysails.tripod.com

"Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax
and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein