OZ remarked: Ahhh thank God for my word wrap option :-)

katysails wrote:
I didn't realize you hung on my every word so.....

katysails, your words are like pearls. And they should be wrapped around
something...

DSK

So now you're claiming that you're not an idiot??

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Jon, you seem to share something with the Dems Presidential candidate-- a
bit of difficulty getting your story straight.

On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:03:27 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
said:

Also, Dave's an idiot.

On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:05:52 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
said:

You seem moderately intelligent

Now I suppose I should take "moderately intelligent" as a compliment from
a
mental giant such as you [irony]. But two different stories within about 3
hours somehow detracts from the credibility of both.



Dave
S/V Good Fortune
CS27

Well, John, I understood his explanation the first time. Looks to me
like you're simply trolling for the sake of it. Taking over Bob****'s
role perhaps?

Dave's quite right - the incidence of stupidity crosses all varieties
of skin colour, eye folds et al. What's your problem with that? You can
call him a racist, but you're just coming across as a PC facist. It's
boring.

PDW

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

So, backpeddle all you want, but the fact remains that you're the
racist. Nothing you have said so far would indicate differently.
Does this go along with being a republican or is it just your
predeliction?

Actually, you'd be the only one who understood it. I don't
troll as a general rule, and I'm not trolling now. The facts
are that he *is* obviously a racist and he's obviously trolling.
I'm far from PC. I'm not sure what you are.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
. ..

Well, John, I understood his explanation the first time. Looks to me
like you're simply trolling for the sake of it. Taking over Bob****'s
role perhaps?

Dave's quite right - the incidence of stupidity crosses all varieties
of skin colour, eye folds et al. What's your problem with that? You can
call him a racist, but you're just coming across as a PC facist. It's
boring.

PDW

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

So, backpeddle all you want, but the fact remains that you're the
racist. Nothing you have said so far would indicate differently.
Does this go along with being a republican or is it just your
predeliction?

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

Actually, you'd be the only one who understood it. I don't
troll as a general rule, and I'm not trolling now. The facts
are that he *is* obviously a racist and he's obviously trolling.
I'm far from PC. I'm not sure what you are.

Human.

PDW

Prove it.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
. ..
In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

Actually, you'd be the only one who understood it. I don't
troll as a general rule, and I'm not trolling now. The facts
are that he *is* obviously a racist and he's obviously trolling.
I'm far from PC. I'm not sure what you are.

Human.

PDW

More likely, he's been injecting Drano.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:10:24 +1100, Peter Wiley

said:

Dave's quite right - the incidence of stupidity crosses all varieties
of skin colour, eye folds et al. What's your problem with that? You can
call him a racist, but you're just coming across as a PC facist. It's
boring.

Thank you, Peter, for interjecting the voice of reason.

Dave
S/V Good Fortune
CS27

1. Define acceptable proof.

2. Demonstrate why I should bother.

3. Stop being a Bob****.

PDW

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

Prove it.

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

More likely, he's been injecting Drano.

You really are losing it, Jon. I used to think you were a reasonable
person, but you're displaying pretty undesirable behaviour. Personally
I don't give much of a damn, I can easily add you to the KF for 6
months or so, but try taking a look in the mirror. I'm an easy-going
person and if I think you're acting like an asshole, perhaps the
problem isn't my perception.

PDW

1. Acceptable proof for whom? I don't really care.
2. Ummm... why would I care?
3. That's not possible. He has no peers.

You started this with calling me a facist.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
. ..

1. Define acceptable proof.

2. Demonstrate why I should bother.

3. Stop being a Bob****.

PDW

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

Prove it.