Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() *Yawn*. The logical conclusion is one you were told many times over. We don't care. I assume you've decided not to buy a boat sice you can't get anyone to agree with your approach. PDW In article , Jim Cate wrote: To summarize the discussion following this question, 95% of the responses were to the effect that my question was not relevant, or, for some reason or another, shouldn't have been asked in the first place. Almost no one was willing to answer the question direclty. This naturally raises the question, why? What's the problem? The logical conclusion is that this is an issue most sailors would prefer to ignore. Jim Jim Cate wrote: As discussed in other subject strings, I'm looking at 30 to 35-foot used boats such as Cals, O'Days, Catalinas, etc. My intended use would be for day sailing and sailing offshore near the coast in the Texas Gulf. As mentioned, offshore sailing would probably require four or five days in our area because of the distances involved. Although I know it all depends on the person, the crew, the circumstances, the boat, etc., have there been any studies or surveys that might provide some idea of how many days of sailing per year an owner of such a boat typically gets, particularly after the first year? Again, it's obvious that it all depends, on the person, the individual circumstances, his work load, etc., and that there can be no generalizations. (No need to tell me this. - It's pretty self-evident.) Still, there may have been some polls or surveys, or at least, some general experience and consensus regarding the question. The reason for asking is that, though I'm anxious to get out to the blue water, I'm wondering whether I would be the exception to what seems to be the general rule in this area, in which the boats seem to sit in their slips for 99.9 percent of the time. For example, one of the brokers I spoke with last week bragged that the owner of that boat had only taken the boat out some 10-12 times in the past ten years. - Any estimates, guesses? Jim |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nah, he already bought it and is looking for validation of his stupid
move. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Peter Wiley" wrote in message . .. *Yawn*. The logical conclusion is one you were told many times over. We don't care. I assume you've decided not to buy a boat sice you can't get anyone to agree with your approach. PDW In article , Jim Cate wrote: To summarize the discussion following this question, 95% of the responses were to the effect that my question was not relevant, or, for some reason or another, shouldn't have been asked in the first place. Almost no one was willing to answer the question direclty. This naturally raises the question, why? What's the problem? The logical conclusion is that this is an issue most sailors would prefer to ignore. Jim Jim Cate wrote: As discussed in other subject strings, I'm looking at 30 to 35-foot used boats such as Cals, O'Days, Catalinas, etc. My intended use would be for day sailing and sailing offshore near the coast in the Texas Gulf. As mentioned, offshore sailing would probably require four or five days in our area because of the distances involved. Although I know it all depends on the person, the crew, the circumstances, the boat, etc., have there been any studies or surveys that might provide some idea of how many days of sailing per year an owner of such a boat typically gets, particularly after the first year? Again, it's obvious that it all depends, on the person, the individual circumstances, his work load, etc., and that there can be no generalizations. (No need to tell me this. - It's pretty self-evident.) Still, there may have been some polls or surveys, or at least, some general experience and consensus regarding the question. The reason for asking is that, though I'm anxious to get out to the blue water, I'm wondering whether I would be the exception to what seems to be the general rule in this area, in which the boats seem to sit in their slips for 99.9 percent of the time. For example, one of the brokers I spoke with last week bragged that the owner of that boat had only taken the boat out some 10-12 times in the past ten years. - Any estimates, guesses? Jim |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote: Nah, he already bought it and is looking for validation of his stupid move. Hey, you were right! He probably bought it before his first post here and hasn't been able to bring himself to admit it. I've never even seen one of these things, doubt they'd go well in Hobart where we can get 40+ knots up the channel. PDW |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Wiley wrote: *Yawn*. The logical conclusion is one you were told many times over. We don't care. "Yawn" is the response you would like to pretend is the case, but in my experience, its not the truth. Boat owners I speak with DO concern themselves with the fact that they pay their money to the marinas and the insurance company and various other expenses, but can only sail infrequently. Many of them seem to find their use tapering off over time, and finally selling their boat after realizing they aren't using it as they had anticipated. As I mentioned previously, I'm not saying that this (time spent sailing per dollar spent) is the only, or even the primary consideration. - Some people seem to enjoy owning a boat so that they can talk about it on this ng. - But it is ONE factor that should be taken into consideration, IMO. I assume you've decided not to buy a boat sice you can't get anyone to agree with your approach. PDW Nope. Wrong again. Jim |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Cate" wrote
"Yawn" is the response I get a lot. I'm sure Boat owners I speak with DO concern themselves with the fact that they pay their money to the marinas and the insurance company and various other expenses, but can only sail infrequently. Many of them seem to find their use tapering off over time, and finally selling their boat after realizing they aren't using it as they had anticipated. Well, there's the problem, you spoke to 'boat owners' and not 'sailors'. Some people seem to enjoy owning a boat so that they can talk about it on this ng. - Not if they own a Mac26X. -- Scotty S/V Lisa Marie Balt. MD USA |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 10:02:37 -0500, "Scott Vernon"
wrote: "Jim Cate" wrote "Yawn" is the response I get a lot. I'm sure Boat owners I speak with DO concern themselves with the fact that they pay their money to the marinas and the insurance company and various other expenses, but can only sail infrequently. Many of them seem to find their use tapering off over time, and finally selling their boat after realizing they aren't using it as they had anticipated. Well, there's the problem, you spoke to 'boat owners' and not 'sailors'. Some people seem to enjoy owning a boat so that they can talk about it on this ng. - Not if they own a Mac26X. You have obviously made the mistake of comparing the Mac26X with the "New and Improved" Mac26M. Apparently Macgregor has completely designed the 26X, generally regarded as one of the most laughable piece of crap boats on the market to a yacht that some buyers are considering as an alternative to the Valiant ![]() how to tell the difference between the "old" and the "new" 26, the new ones are apparently blue or red and the old ones are generally white. I am not certain when the option of a carbon fiber spar will be made available for the Mac...that is what I am waiting for ![]() By the way, I was forced to use one of those firberglass portapotties at the park the other day and I was a bit surprised to see that they are made by Macgregor. It was apparently the 7V, or 7' Vertical model. It seemed to be better built than their line of boats...probably faster under sail as well ![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
See... I was right. He bought the piece of junk as is now trying to
justify the purchase. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Peter Wiley wrote: *Yawn*. The logical conclusion is one you were told many times over. We don't care. "Yawn" is the response you would like to pretend is the case, but in my experience, its not the truth. Boat owners I speak with DO concern themselves with the fact that they pay their money to the marinas and the insurance company and various other expenses, but can only sail infrequently. Many of them seem to find their use tapering off over time, and finally selling their boat after realizing they aren't using it as they had anticipated. As I mentioned previously, I'm not saying that this (time spent sailing per dollar spent) is the only, or even the primary consideration. - Some people seem to enjoy owning a boat so that they can talk about it on this ng. - But it is ONE factor that should be taken into consideration, IMO. I assume you've decided not to buy a boat sice you can't get anyone to agree with your approach. PDW Nope. Wrong again. Jim |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Jim Cate
wrote: Peter Wiley wrote: *Yawn*. The logical conclusion is one you were told many times over. We don't care. "Yawn" is the response you would like to pretend is the case, It *is* the case. but in my experience, its not the truth. Boat owners I speak with DO concern themselves with the fact that they pay their money to the marinas and the insurance company and various other expenses, but can only sail infrequently. Then they shouldn't have bought a boat, they should charter one when they have time and let someone else wear the expenses when it's idle. Many of them seem to find their use tapering off over time, and finally selling their boat after realizing they aren't using it as they had anticipated. So what? I did this with SCUBA diving and a number of otherhobbies/activities. Didn't stop me from doing them & enjoying them. I didn't stop because of money tied up, I stopped because I wanted to do something different. Hell, I own a 600 acre place in another state that I get to a couple times a year. I don't bother thinking about opportunity costs etc etc. As I mentioned previously, I'm not saying that this (time spent sailing per dollar spent) is the only, or even the primary consideration. - Some people seem to enjoy owning a boat so that they can talk about it on this ng. - But it is ONE factor that should be taken into consideration, IMO. Yeah - your opinion. Fact is, most of us here simply don't care. That makes you the odd one out on this n/g. Your problem, IOW, not ours. Find another n/g more simpatico rather than ranting here. I assume you've decided not to buy a boat sice you can't get anyone to agree with your approach. PDW Nope. Wrong again. You *did* buy what everyone here advised against? Enjoy......... PDW |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The guy sounds a bit like bob. Wonder if it's him trolling? Bob always
cared more about how much a boat costs or what he could make on it than the actualy sailing. He also was into counting his cute little day sails as sailing time and bragging about it. SV "Peter Wiley" wrote in message . .. In article , Jim Cate wrote: Peter Wiley wrote: *Yawn*. The logical conclusion is one you were told many times over. We don't care. "Yawn" is the response you would like to pretend is the case, It *is* the case. but in my experience, its not the truth. Boat owners I speak with DO concern themselves with the fact that they pay their money to the marinas and the insurance company and various other expenses, but can only sail infrequently. Then they shouldn't have bought a boat, they should charter one when they have time and let someone else wear the expenses when it's idle. Many of them seem to find their use tapering off over time, and finally selling their boat after realizing they aren't using it as they had anticipated. So what? I did this with SCUBA diving and a number of otherhobbies/activities. Didn't stop me from doing them & enjoying them. I didn't stop because of money tied up, I stopped because I wanted to do something different. Hell, I own a 600 acre place in another state that I get to a couple times a year. I don't bother thinking about opportunity costs etc etc. As I mentioned previously, I'm not saying that this (time spent sailing per dollar spent) is the only, or even the primary consideration. - Some people seem to enjoy owning a boat so that they can talk about it on this ng. - But it is ONE factor that should be taken into consideration, IMO. Yeah - your opinion. Fact is, most of us here simply don't care. That makes you the odd one out on this n/g. Your problem, IOW, not ours. Find another n/g more simpatico rather than ranting here. I assume you've decided not to buy a boat sice you can't get anyone to agree with your approach. PDW Nope. Wrong again. You *did* buy what everyone here advised against? Enjoy......... PDW |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim observed:
-- Many of them seem to find their use tapering off over time, and finally selling their boat after realizing they aren't using it as they had anticipated None of those people are regulars here. Those are hobby sailors...they haven't committed. And anyone who looks at sailing as a financial proposition where you can get out fiscally solvent is a fool. It does happen once in a while...we made a profit on both the O'Days...but in reality, you're putting your money into the enjoyment of sailing and "being there". katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Found it! Political test website | General | |||
Third Florida trip report (long, of course!) | Cruising | |||
Is sailing becoming extinct? | General |