Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff Morris wrote:
I wouldn't argue with your claim that the Cal is better built than the O'Day, which I've always considered a notch or two below Pearsons, etc. in quality. O'Day build quality varied a lot over the years. Actually so did Pearson, they were each owned by several different companies over time and built in several different facilities. The O'Days I have most experience with are the smaller ones, except for the center cockpit 37. That boat is built very solidly, but the details and fitting out leave something to be desired. Some of their smaller boats were quite well done. Others were flimsy crap. Seemed to vary widely and I don't know what years (or corporate ownership) were the good ones. In general, I agree that Pearsons are a bit above the average for mass-produced boats, in some regards. Cal also, and more consistent... But I'm not sure the Cal is faster in general conditions. In fact, its PHRF is about 20 to 25 point higher. I think the O'Day would hold its own very nicely, while giving a more comfortable ride. The O'Day probably has a considerably more optimized cabin layout too. They adopted some innovations that Cal ignored. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crusing, hull speed, Cal 34 ft vs O'Day 34 | Cruising | |||
Narrow hull speed question | Boat Building | |||
allied seawind 2 hull speed | General | |||
Hull speed theory? | Boat Building |