Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Hull Speed, Cal, O'Day 34
Bobsprit wrote: Incidentally, are you also an astronomy expert? That happens to be one of my intersts, and I plan on being at the TSP again this year. Not an "expert" but I've been an avid amatuer for 20 years. I currently use a Celestron 9.25. I do most of my observing in PA where darker skies still prevail. I used to use a Dynascope RV6, Celestron 8 and Questar Duplex. I've used a lot of scopes and do consider myself an armchair expert when it comes to scope buying. RB I have a 16-inch newt mounted in a truss-tube Dob assembly. I'm a member of the NASA -JSC astronomy club and have been attending the Texas Star Party for several years, held annually in the spring in west Texas. I also have one the new Meade autoguided systems. I'm hoping to finish the Messier list this year. - Don't think this would work on a boat, but binocular observing should be good off shore. Jim |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Hull Speed, Cal, O'Day 34
I have a 16-inch newt mounted in a truss-tube Dob assembly. I'm a
member of the NASA -JSC astronomy club and have been attending the Texas Star Party for several years, held annually in the spring in west Texas. Wow! That's a big piece of glass! Congrats. Something like that would be too much for me, but I love looking through the big scopes. Yeah, astronomy via scopes won't work well on a boat and I'd sooner keep good optics clear of salt water. Last summer we did okay anchored in Oyster Bay...lying on the fordeck and counting meteors. RB |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Hull Speed, Cal, O'Day 34
I also have one the new Meade autoguided systems. I'm hoping to
finish the Messier list this year. - Don't think this would work on a boat, but binocular observing should be good off shore. I'm a big anti-meade guy! Celestron all the way for SCTs! RB |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Hull Speed, Cal, O'Day 34
Donal wrote: "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... After all the interesting, thoughtful, considerate, helpful, balanced, discussions regarding the Mac26M, I'm still looking at different options. There seem to be some great buys on larger boats in our area, snip Comments, suggestions, or recommendations regarding these or other similar boats will be appreciated. You need to keep looking. When you find the boat that is right for you, you will want it so badly, that you will get stomach cramps. If you feel the need to seek our opinions, then you haven't found the boat that is right for *you*. Regards Actually, I am tempted by a nice '78 34-ft Cal that's seems to be in good condition and that's being offered at a reasonable price. This boat is christened "Delilah," and the temptation is really getting to me. (Guess I should be careful not to let my hair grow too long!) There are also several other boats in this price range. Delilah has a relatively shallow draft, under 5 feet, which would be advantageous in our bay complex. This is the *** III model, which I understand was a later production run that incorporated some improvements over the earlier models. I think that it would be somewhat more tender than the O'Day, but probably more fun to sail in light to medium winds. The problem, again, is that it would take 5 hours to motor down to Galveston and get to some blue water, and, for several reasons, leaving it at a marina in Galveston introduces some problems. Jim Donal -- |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Hull Speed, Cal, O'Day 34
Sure do, you can't make civil discussion , nor can you handle data in
conflict with your antequated ideas. I am sure the casual observer can tell the real fool here. It may even be me, but I doubt it. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... you need to be told six or eight times before you have a chance of understanding once. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. Understand? From: "The Carrolls" Date: 3/6/2004 11:40 PM Eastern Standard Time Message-id: You're repeating your self again old fella. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... like I said, you are a wet dream for all the unscrupulous brokers in the land. Let me add, "Deservedly so". Never said any thing about a broker. Never said "fine investment " or "recover your money." Didn't say don't depreciate much, but Odays don't, they are generally too old to depreciate much.. Did say "Holding their price nicely," most 20 to 25 year old boats do. You should do research before shooting your mouth off, figuratively speaking "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... like I said, dude, you are the wet dream of every unscrupulous yacht broker in the land. "don't depreciate much", "fine investment", "recover your money". Then the broker calls home and tells his wife they are going out to dinner that night. She says, "Another one?". He say, "Yup". Again you show the depth of you intelect and quality of your research. 20 year old boats don't depreciate much. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... boy, you guys are the wet dream of every dishonest yacht broker out there. Nope, they have been holding price nicely as of late. Also very few seem to come to market, compared to the numbers built and other manufacturers with similar numbers. wrote in message .. . On 05 Mar 2004 22:01:22 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote: But I'm not sure the Cal is faster in general conditions. In fact, its PHRF is about 20 to 25 point higher. I think the O'Day would hold its own very nicely, while giving a more comfortable ride. The Oday is faster in most conditions. RB Including depreciation. BB |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Hull Speed, Cal, O'Day 34
Sure do, you can't make civil discussion , nor can you handle data in
conflict with your antequated ideas. I am sure the casual observer can tell the real fool here. It may even be me, but I doubt it. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. Understand? "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... you need to be told six or eight times before you have a chance of understanding once. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. Understand? From: "The Carrolls" Date: 3/6/2004 11:40 PM Eastern Standard Time Message-id: You're repeating your self again old fella. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... like I said, you are a wet dream for all the unscrupulous brokers in the land. Let me add, "Deservedly so". Never said any thing about a broker. Never said "fine investment " or "recover your money." Didn't say don't depreciate much, but Odays don't, they are generally too old to depreciate much.. Did say "Holding their price nicely," most 20 to 25 year old boats do. You should do research before shooting your mouth off, figuratively speaking "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... like I said, dude, you are the wet dream of every unscrupulous yacht broker in the land. "don't depreciate much", "fine investment", "recover your money". Then the broker calls home and tells his wife they are going out to dinner that night. She says, "Another one?". He say, "Yup". Again you show the depth of you intelect and quality of your research. 20 year old boats don't depreciate much. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... boy, you guys are the wet dream of every dishonest yacht broker out there. Nope, they have been holding price nicely as of late. Also very few seem to come to market, compared to the numbers built and other manufacturers with similar numbers. wrote in message .. . On 05 Mar 2004 22:01:22 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote: But I'm not sure the Cal is faster in general conditions. In fact, its PHRF is about 20 to 25 point higher. I think the O'Day would hold its own very nicely, while giving a more comfortable ride. The Oday is faster in most conditions. RB Including depreciation. BB |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Hull Speed, Cal, O'Day 34
We understand perfectly what you are.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... Sure do, you can't make civil discussion , nor can you handle data in conflict with your antequated ideas. I am sure the casual observer can tell the real fool here. It may even be me, but I doubt it. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. Understand? "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... you need to be told six or eight times before you have a chance of understanding once. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. you're a fool. Understand? From: "The Carrolls" Date: 3/6/2004 11:40 PM Eastern Standard Time Message-id: You're repeating your self again old fella. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... like I said, you are a wet dream for all the unscrupulous brokers in the land. Let me add, "Deservedly so". Never said any thing about a broker. Never said "fine investment " or "recover your money." Didn't say don't depreciate much, but Odays don't, they are generally too old to depreciate much.. Did say "Holding their price nicely," most 20 to 25 year old boats do. You should do research before shooting your mouth off, figuratively speaking "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... like I said, dude, you are the wet dream of every unscrupulous yacht broker in the land. "don't depreciate much", "fine investment", "recover your money". Then the broker calls home and tells his wife they are going out to dinner that night. She says, "Another one?". He say, "Yup". Again you show the depth of you intelect and quality of your research. 20 year old boats don't depreciate much. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... boy, you guys are the wet dream of every dishonest yacht broker out there. Nope, they have been holding price nicely as of late. Also very few seem to come to market, compared to the numbers built and other manufacturers with similar numbers. wrote in message .. . On 05 Mar 2004 22:01:22 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote: But I'm not sure the Cal is faster in general conditions. In fact, its PHRF is about 20 to 25 point higher. I think the O'Day would hold its own very nicely, while giving a more comfortable ride. The Oday is faster in most conditions. RB Including depreciation. BB |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Hull Speed, Cal, O'Day 34
That sounds impressive. How far can you see with it?
SV "Jim Cate" wrote I have a 16-inch newt mounted in a truss-tube Dob assembly. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Hull Speed, Cal, O'Day 34
Scott Vernon wrote: That sounds impressive. How far can you see with it? SV Real far. Jim "Jim Cate" wrote I have a 16-inch newt mounted in a truss-tube Dob assembly. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Hull Speed, Cal, O'Day 34
Bobsprit wrote: I have a 16-inch newt mounted in a truss-tube Dob assembly. I'm a member of the NASA -JSC astronomy club and have been attending the Texas Star Party for several years, held annually in the spring in west Texas. Wow! That's a big piece of glass! Congrats. Something like that would be too much for me, but I love looking through the big scopes. My wife and I recently built a new Dob truss tube system for the scope and installed the 16-inch mirror and other optics in it. It can be set up or collapsed into a 2x2' package in a few minutes and then rolled around easily on a "wheelbarrow" arrangment. - So, it's easy to store in a small space and to load in a van or pickup for transport. Yeah, astronomy via scopes won't work well on a boat and I'd sooner keep good optics clear of salt water. Last summer we did okay anchored in Oyster Bay...lying on the fordeck and counting meteors. RB I'll leave my good binos at home. Jim |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crusing, hull speed, Cal 34 ft vs O'Day 34 | Cruising | |||
Narrow hull speed question | Boat Building | |||
allied seawind 2 hull speed | General | |||
Hull speed theory? | Boat Building |