Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're not dealing with reality here. Sure winds can be higher
than predicted. That has nothing to do with being prepared for and expect conditions different from what is "predicted." By definition, it's only a guess. So what you're saying is that because light winds are predicted, you don't bring foul weather gear and a sail change. You just go with the prediction. Sounds stupid to me. "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Jonathan Ganz wrote: That's a stupid question. Unexpected winds??? What kind of sailor would not expect conditions such as this? A stupid or inexperienced one. Is there anyone on this ng with extensive sailing experience who hasn't run into winds higher than were predicted, and higher than he or she expected? In our area, forecasts can suggest good sailing conditions with only a slight chance of showers, but storms and severe winds can form quite quickly. Ummm... you just contradicted yourself. Sorry to have to point it out. Get a grip on yourself Johnathan. - Any serious sailor should expect and be prepared for the possibility that unexpected weather conditions may occur. If you were sailing a decent boat, it would survive just about any high winds that come by. A perfect example is the Satori from Perfect Storm fame (not the f*cking movie). It was not an expensive boat compared to other ocean going sailboats. The fact is that the Mac would not survive anything approaching the kind of weather one should be prepared to find on the ocean. The Satori was a heavy boat specifically built to survive severe heavy weather conditions miles offshore. It had an overbuilt hull, rigging, keel, etc., etc. I doubt that most sailors on this ng would enjoy sailing such a boat even if they could afford the substantial additional costs. Jim |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jonathan Ganz wrote: You're not dealing with reality here. Sure winds can be higher than predicted. That has nothing to do with being prepared for and expect conditions different from what is "predicted." By definition, it's only a guess. So what you're saying is that because light winds are predicted, you don't bring foul weather gear and a sail change. You just go with the prediction. Sounds stupid to me. Nope. Not at all. I would want to be prepared for any potential circumstance, but I would plan on motoring and/or sailing back to port if conditions worsened unexpectantly. If that was not possible, I think the Macgregor, with reefed or no sails, and storm anchor, could survive with the best of them. Not comfortably, but it would survive. By the way, Johathan, are you going to buy one of the heavy-weather Satori's? "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Jonathan Ganz wrote: That's a stupid question. Unexpected winds??? What kind of sailor would not expect conditions such as this? A stupid or inexperienced one. Is there anyone on this ng with extensive sailing experience who hasn't run into winds higher than were predicted, and higher than he or she expected? In our area, forecasts can suggest good sailing conditions with only a slight chance of showers, but storms and severe winds can form quite quickly. Ummm... you just contradicted yourself. Sorry to have to point it out. Get a grip on yourself Johnathan. - Any serious sailor should expect and be prepared for the possibility that unexpected weather conditions may occur. If you were sailing a decent boat, it would survive just about any high winds that come by. A perfect example is the Satori from Perfect Storm fame (not the f*cking movie). It was not an expensive boat compared to other ocean going sailboats. The fact is that the Mac would not survive anything approaching the kind of weather one should be prepared to find on the ocean. The Satori was a heavy boat specifically built to survive severe heavy weather conditions miles offshore. It had an overbuilt hull, rigging, keel, etc., etc. I doubt that most sailors on this ng would enjoy sailing such a boat even if they could afford the substantial additional costs. Jim |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MacBoy, you say you would want to be prepared, but you would plan on
motoring or sailing back from where? 500 miles off the coast? Actually, the truth is that you would not survive either with or without your Mac, since you're clearly not much of sailor, having bought a Mac. But, since you made the statement you did about the Mac surviving such an experience, it's again obvious that you know nothing of boats. However, feel free to prove us all wrong. I suggest you leave immediately. Give us a full report including pictures should you happen to return. I'm sure we'll all then rush out and buy one. I'm not planning on buying a Satori, since I already have a quite a nice boat, which while off-shore capable, is not set up for it. Further, I have no desire to do any extended off-shore trips, since where I sail is fun and challenging, and I have local responsibilities. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Jonathan Ganz wrote: You're not dealing with reality here. Sure winds can be higher than predicted. That has nothing to do with being prepared for and expect conditions different from what is "predicted." By definition, it's only a guess. So what you're saying is that because light winds are predicted, you don't bring foul weather gear and a sail change. You just go with the prediction. Sounds stupid to me. Nope. Not at all. I would want to be prepared for any potential circumstance, but I would plan on motoring and/or sailing back to port if conditions worsened unexpectantly. If that was not possible, I think the Macgregor, with reefed or no sails, and storm anchor, could survive with the best of them. Not comfortably, but it would survive. By the way, Johathan, are you going to buy one of the heavy-weather Satori's? "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Jonathan Ganz wrote: That's a stupid question. Unexpected winds??? What kind of sailor would not expect conditions such as this? A stupid or inexperienced one. Is there anyone on this ng with extensive sailing experience who hasn't run into winds higher than were predicted, and higher than he or she expected? In our area, forecasts can suggest good sailing conditions with only a slight chance of showers, but storms and severe winds can form quite quickly. Ummm... you just contradicted yourself. Sorry to have to point it out. Get a grip on yourself Johnathan. - Any serious sailor should expect and be prepared for the possibility that unexpected weather conditions may occur. If you were sailing a decent boat, it would survive just about any high winds that come by. A perfect example is the Satori from Perfect Storm fame (not the f*cking movie). It was not an expensive boat compared to other ocean going sailboats. The fact is that the Mac would not survive anything approaching the kind of weather one should be prepared to find on the ocean. The Satori was a heavy boat specifically built to survive severe heavy weather conditions miles offshore. It had an overbuilt hull, rigging, keel, etc., etc. I doubt that most sailors on this ng would enjoy sailing such a boat even if they could afford the substantial additional costs. Jim |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jonathan Ganz wrote: MacBoy, you say you would want to be prepared, but you would plan on motoring or sailing back from where? 500 miles off the coast? Nope. Not more than 100 miles offshore. Actually, the truth is that you would not survive either with or without your Mac, since you're clearly not much of sailor, having bought a Mac. What a ridiculous, asinine statement. - I'm not a sailor, since I bought a Mac. - The bottom line, Jonathan, is that you have no understanding whatsoever of the most basic aspects of logic, rationality, and intellectual honesty. - In other words, you aren't willing to tell the truth. But, since you made the statement you did about the Mac surviving such an experience, it's again obvious that you know nothing of boats. However, feel free to prove us all wrong. I suggest you leave immediately. Give us a full report including pictures should you happen to return. I'm sure we'll all then rush out and buy one. I'll be happy to provide detailed reports of my offshore trips in the Mac26M. I'm not planning on buying a Satori, since I already have a quite a nice boat, which while off-shore capable, is not set up for it. Further, I have no desire to do any extended off-shore trips, since where I sail is fun and challenging, and I have local responsibilities. Sure Johnathan. But would you recommend the Satori to anyone else on this ng??? Jim |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan Ganz wrote:
you're clearly not much of sailor, having bought a Mac. "Jim Cate" agreed and wrote ... I'm not a sailor, since I bought a Mac. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MacBoy,
Actually, if you had said 100 miles inland, I might have agreed with you. No. You're not a sailor because you have no idea how to sail. You think a motor boat with a sail on it is a sailboat. You claim a great deal of knowledge for someone who just plunked down a bunch of money for a piece of junk. We await your unlikely return from the ocean. Yes, there are several people on this ng who have a greater chance of even wanting to sail offshore. In fact, I could recommend it to myself, if I wanted to do that again. Maybe I will someday. At the moment, I'm only interested in bay and minor coastal sailing. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Jonathan Ganz wrote: MacBoy, you say you would want to be prepared, but you would plan on motoring or sailing back from where? 500 miles off the coast? Nope. Not more than 100 miles offshore. Actually, the truth is that you would not survive either with or without your Mac, since you're clearly not much of sailor, having bought a Mac. What a ridiculous, asinine statement. - I'm not a sailor, since I bought a Mac. - The bottom line, Jonathan, is that you have no understanding whatsoever of the most basic aspects of logic, rationality, and intellectual honesty. - In other words, you aren't willing to tell the truth. But, since you made the statement you did about the Mac surviving such an experience, it's again obvious that you know nothing of boats. However, feel free to prove us all wrong. I suggest you leave immediately. Give us a full report including pictures should you happen to return. I'm sure we'll all then rush out and buy one. I'll be happy to provide detailed reports of my offshore trips in the Mac26M. I'm not planning on buying a Satori, since I already have a quite a nice boat, which while off-shore capable, is not set up for it. Further, I have no desire to do any extended off-shore trips, since where I sail is fun and challenging, and I have local responsibilities. Sure Johnathan. But would you recommend the Satori to anyone else on this ng??? Jim |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jonathan Ganz wrote: MacBoy, Actually, if you had said 100 miles inland, I might have agreed with you. No. You're not a sailor because you have no idea how to sail. You think a motor boat with a sail on it is a sailboat. You claim a great deal of knowledge for someone who just plunked down a bunch of money for a piece of junk. We await your unlikely return from the ocean. Yes, there are several people on this ng who have a greater chance of even wanting to sail offshore. In fact, I could recommend it to myself, if I wanted to do that again. Maybe I will someday. At the moment, I'm only interested in bay and minor coastal sailing. You seem to be loosing it, Johathan, for everyone to see. - Get a grip on yourself. And if what you say were true, that I'm going to perish at sea if I sail the 26M offshore, then you will soon be rid of me, after which you won't have to read or respond to any of my notes. - That ought to make you happy, but instead, you're obviously so stressed out over this discussion that you can't let it go. Jim |