"7" is a philosophical contruct, therefore it cannot be considered in the
context of "luck" without leaving its construct behind.

To ask if "7" is a lucky number is to ask if a rock has shaktipa.

but still you can't have an opinion of a number.

7 is a lucky number. Do you agree?

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
"7" is a philosophical contruct,

Are you telling us that "7" is not a number?


Wow! You reall are very weird.





To ask if "7" is a lucky number is to ask if a rock has shaktipa.

Rubbish. I didn't ask if "7" was a lucky number. I "told" you that it
was lucky.



Regards


Donal
--

"Donal" wrote in message news:c25sb8$7bb$3

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
"7" is a philosophical contruct,

Are you telling us that "7" is not a number?

Wow! You reall are very weird.


And he calls everyone else a "sophist"!

give it up, jeffies. heavy math is beyond you. Hell, simple math is beyond
you.

"7" is a philosophical contruct,

Are you telling us that "7" is not a number?

Wow! You reall are very weird.


And he calls everyone else a "sophist"!

Nice try jaxie. You're the one who couldn't solve the math problem, you just
took a guess, which was off by almost 10% and 5 degrees. And you didn't even
try the second problem until I gave you the answer.



"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
give it up, jeffies. heavy math is beyond you. Hell, simple math is beyond
you.

"7" is a philosophical contruct,

Are you telling us that "7" is not a number?

Wow! You reall are very weird.


And he calls everyone else a "sophist"!

donny, math is a little heavy for litewaits.

numbers are philosophical constructs.

you weren't talking math, but rather the representation of numbers in the
context of superstition.

nice try, though.

"7" is a philosophical contruct,

Are you telling us that "7" is not a number?


Wow! You reall are very weird.





To ask if "7" is a lucky number is to ask if a rock has shaktipa.

Rubbish. I didn't ask if "7" was a lucky number. I "told" you that it
was lucky.



Regards


Donal
--

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
donny, math is a little heavy for litewaits.

numbers are philosophical constructs.

So, you are saying that it is not possible to have an opinion about a
philisophical construct???

You really are an an absolute idiot, aren't you?

Regards


Donal
--

No. He's not perfect.

"Donal" wrote in message
...

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
donny, math is a little heavy for litewaits.

numbers are philosophical constructs.

So, you are saying that it is not possible to have an opinion about a
philisophical construct???

You really are an an absolute idiot, aren't you?

Regards


Donal
--

not when we are talking about numbers as symbols.

donny, math is a little heavy for litewaits.

numbers are philosophical constructs.

So, you are saying that it is not possible to have an opinion about a
philisophical construct???

You really are an an absolute idiot, aren't you?

Regards


Donal
--