Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
Navigation Question
Joe,
Just ignore the Jax static. He can't seem to realize I'm talking about him, Not to him. Ole Thom |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Navigation Question
JAXAshby wrote: guys, until yesterday you never even heard of Lunar Distances and today you are all experts. Yet, not one of you clowns can find a single course available in "celestial navigation" that includes Lunar Distances. Not one. ROFLMAO I've always enjoyed watching your vain attempts to squirm/write your way out of the messes, you write your way into...... I see nothings changed and only you are dumb enough to buy into your BS. In answer to your typically stupid post: Anyone who has had any type of in depth education on navigation, either formal or informal, will be aware of "Lunar Distances". However, since we were not living prior to the 19th century, there is no need for us to have more than a passing familiarity with "nuts and bolts" of the particular system to find longitude. Hence the reason you will find few if any courses which teach "celestial navigation" which will waste an inordinate amount of time teaching something which can be performed much more easily, by other methods of celestial navigation. G Gotta check my settings ..... thought I had your useless ass, killfiled. otn |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Navigation Question
you found one. now, just where is that course given and just how much time is
given to Lunar Distances and just how many people on the planet who know "celestial navigation" even know that an accurate timepiece is not required? felton, you are a sophist, a term for a sophomore poly sci major of limited intelligence trying to explain to the girls why he couldn't get in engineering college. dougies, until I posted you had never even heard of the term "Lunar Distances" and now you are claiming to be an expert. wanna show us just which "celestial navigation" course taught just where it is that includes Lunar Distances as part of the corriculum? "Practice with "lunars" is certainly an aerobatic flight in the world of celestial navigation, but those who do it become the very best celestial navigators, in part because very precise sights are requried as well as careful analysis" http://www.starpath.com/catalog/books/1875.htm If you could navigate to the google page, you will find many of them JAXAshby wrote: no, "celestial" as the term is used means to use an accurate timepiece. Lunar distances needs no timepiece at all, let alone an accurate one. Sorry, Jax... wrong again. You should be proud of your perfect record. "Celestial" navigation means to use "celestial" bodies. And the lunar distance is a method of telling time, making the "celestial" bodies themselves a timepiece. So you are doubly wrong. Your mom would be so proud! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Navigation Question
Yet, not one of you clowns can find a single course available in "celestial
navigation" that includes Lunar Distances. Not one. not one of you guys thought to check King's Point. There may be other places that teach Lunar Distances, but I have never heard of which. It is a skill obsolete since the middle of the 19th century when chronometers because cheap enough to become ubiquitous. |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Navigation Question
otn, you just explained why celestial navigation is worthless. you also
explained why celestial navigation as the term is used does not include Lunar Distances. btw, Lunar Distances were in common use on most ships until about the middle of the 19th century, not the beginning. guys, until yesterday you never even heard of Lunar Distances and today you are all experts. Yet, not one of you clowns can find a single course available in "celestial navigation" that includes Lunar Distances. Not one. ROFLMAO I've always enjoyed watching your vain attempts to squirm/write your way out of the messes, you write your way into...... I see nothings changed and only you are dumb enough to buy into your BS. In answer to your typically stupid post: Anyone who has had any type of in depth education on navigation, either formal or informal, will be aware of "Lunar Distances". However, since we were not living prior to the 19th century, there is no need for us to have more than a passing familiarity with "nuts and bolts" of the particular system to find longitude. Hence the reason you will find few if any courses which teach "celestial navigation" which will waste an inordinate amount of time teaching something which can be performed much more easily, by other methods of celestial navigation. G Gotta check my settings ..... thought I had your useless ass, killfiled. otn |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Navigation Question
This from Jocks...who never went to college other than to clean the
toilets I graduated from one of the largest universities in the country, a school that if it were where you live it would be the 8th or 9th largest city in the country. |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
Navigation Question
JAXAshby wrote: Yet, not one of you clowns can find a single course available in "celestial navigation" that includes Lunar Distances. Not one. not one of you guys thought to check King's Point. There may be other places that teach Lunar Distances, but I have never heard of which. It is a skill obsolete since the middle of the 19th century when chronometers because cheap enough to become ubiquitous. Didn't check and won't check. If KP teaches "Lunar Distances", it will be as an exercise in history, not as a license necessity. BTW, it was not a question of chronometers becoming cheap enough .... it was a question of them becoming reliable enough to be used on a shipboard environment..... You still need to learn to do more in depth "Google" searches, before you try to write as if you are an expert. |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
Navigation Question
I was a professional motor mechanic starting the summer before 7th grade (my
father owned the place). Yeah, OK Jocks...and what was the degree which allowed you to become a motor mechanic? Oz1...of the 3 twins. |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Navigation Question
KP did require (as of at least 10 years ago) and may still require coursework
to graduate that includes Lunar Distances. I didn't learn of chronometers or Lunar Distances by googling. I knew of each before google came into existence. Chronometers were damned expensive until mid 19th century and still had temperature compensation problems until well into the 20th century. These problems were eventually solved with the introduction of consumer electric watches. Lunars were still commonly used on commercial vessels (as opposed to military vessels) until about 150 years ago. The need for celestial nav at all started to go away by the early 1920's when radio navigation started to come online with commercial radio stations, which were required to give their call letters, the city of transmission and frequency every ten minutes. not one of you guys thought to check King's Point. There may be other places that teach Lunar Distances, but I have never heard of which. It is a skill obsolete since the middle of the 19th century when chronometers because cheap enough to become ubiquitous. Didn't check and won't check. If KP teaches "Lunar Distances", it will be as an exercise in history, not as a license necessity. BTW, it was not a question of chronometers becoming cheap enough .... it was a question of them becoming reliable enough to be used on a shipboard environment..... You still need to learn to do more in depth "Google" searches, before you try to write as if you are an expert. |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Navigation Question
JAXAshby wrote: otn, you just explained why celestial navigation is worthless. you also explained why celestial navigation as the term is used does not include Lunar Distances. btw, Lunar Distances were in common use on most ships until about the middle of the 19th century, not the beginning. Oops .... got my centuries wrong.(meant to say not living prior to the 20th century) Actually, Lunar distances were used to some degree, through the 19th century, but the need for them became academic, once the chronometer was readily available. As for celestial being worthless, I will admit, to someone such as yourself, who has never learned to use it and/or become proficient in it's use, it is useless, coupled with the fact, that as "galley boy", you'd never have the need. It is, however, included in "celestial navigation", since, once again, it involves sights of celestial bodies (or are you also unaware of the methods used to obtain the basic information used in lunar distances?). Go back to googling, Jax .... as always,the response to your responses quickly become exercises in talking to a brain dead Cocker Spaniel (My apologies to the Cocker Spaniel owners out there). otn |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTB: Sea Ray exterior part for 1998 370 DA Sundancer | General | |||
WTB: Exterior part for 1998 Sea Ray 370 DA Sundancer | Boat Building | |||
The On-topic war, Part II, (very long) | General | |||
Need the part number for a Gamefisher 5.0 hp motor | General |