Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
Racism is racism is racism. It matters not what direction or what circumstance. I see no difference between those who would put a person in school based on their being 'the right color' than one who would keep a person out based on their being 'the wrong color'. Well, you just aren't looking at the situation realistically. It is not racism at all, it is rationing. Fact- there are only so many places for students at colleges. Fact- students vary *widely* in brainpower, athletic skill, and other achievements. Fact- getting a degree is a big step up in future prospects So, how does one decide which students get in and which ones don't? It might be fun to simply dump all prospective college applicants into a big pit and let them fight it out... the survivors get into school. But that would not pick the smartest, would it? In the past, colleges have been entirely composed of rich WASP males (except for the Jewish & Catholic colleges). The main requirement was the ability to pay. Our society recognizes that people outside this limited circle can make great contributions, so we like to try and let in students that have some prospect of making advances in the sciences. Smart & motivated kids, in other words. Now factor in that all high schools are not created equal, and you might see the picture... let in kid A who is from a poor school but has great grades, fine recommendations, and mediocre test scores; or kid B from a whitebread suburban high school with equally good grades, recommendations slanted by family connections, and test scores that are the product of a high-dollar seminar on 'How To Maximize Your SAT'? Or should we dump both kids and go with kids C & D who are both dumb as stumps but are scions of politically powerful & wealthy families? There is no level playing field. Some kids are going to get left out. It has been proven beyond a doubt that without some type of affirmative action programs, minority students get left out no matter how promising they are... unless they are football or basketball stars... It's just another case of supporting a pesonal definition 'lesser evil' and is, therefore, simply a case of perpetuating evil Another illogical and unsupportable statement. Where do you get this stuff? Higher education is a valuable resource. We have to determine a rational & positive means of distributing that asset. Nothing "evil" about it... just an attempt to be fair, but as always, the ones left out are crying foul. Regards- Doug King |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Hey Hairball, Kerry is a Joke | General | |||
OT Hanoi John Kerry | General | |||
) OT ) Bush's "needless war" | General | |||
Help, Harry, I don't understand (little OT) | General | |||
A Dickens Christmas | General |