Donal wrote:

"otnmbrd" wrote in message
link.net...



This is an IMO requirement, in the main.


Aren't all IMO requirements "in the main"?


Usually "Upon", unless of course you are "in" a submerged
submarine. ;-)

Cheers
Marty

"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...
Donal wrote:

"otnmbrd" wrote in message
link.net...



This is an IMO requirement, in the main.


Aren't all IMO requirements "in the main"?


Usually "Upon", unless of course you are "in" a submerged
submarine. ;-)

I stand corrected!


I'm also relieved by the fact that somebody understands the nonsense that I
write.



Regards


Donal
--

Subject: AIS
From: "Donal"
Date: 01/22/2004 14:39 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...
Donal wrote:

"otnmbrd" wrote in message
link.net...



This is an IMO requirement, in the main.


Aren't all IMO requirements "in the main"?


Usually "Upon", unless of course you are "in" a submerged
submarine. ;-)

I stand corrected!


I'm also relieved by the fact that somebody understands the nonsense that I
write.



Regards


Donal
--

I refrained from commenting on your post in the "AND" thread, since most of
what you wrote was nonsense.
Now we realize, you really are just another Neal, and most anything you post,
is nonsense.
Thanks, saves wasted future post.

Shen

Donal wrote:



I'm also relieved by the fact that somebody understands the nonsense that I
write.


Some of us actuall read something other than magazines that
review cars, stereos, cameras and anything from J D Powers!

Cheers
Marty