Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
AIS
Had my first look at an active AIS system today. I can see this becoming
a very useful tool, especially for the offshore cruisers and single-handed sailors. All it would need would be a simple receiver that was connected to your GPS for inputs, to be able to compare and give warnings of potential and positive close approaches from ships in your area. The system I saw, gave ship name, position, heading, speed, draft,destination, and ETA .... there may have been more, but it was only a quick look. otn |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
AIS
otnmbrd wrote:
Had my first look at an active AIS system today. I can see this becoming a very useful tool, especially for the offshore cruisers and single-handed sailors. It became a requirement for all commercial vessels on the St. Seaway/Great Lakes last year. I thought it was kind of a waste of money to install it on the ferry I ride twice a day, there's a cable ferry not too far from my home (five miles), they have to install one, the boat holds three cars (small ones at that) and plies a course of about 300 metres! Whoever makes these systems is probably fairly happy with the Canadian Government. Cheers Marty |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
AIS
Martin Baxter wrote: otnmbrd wrote: Had my first look at an active AIS system today. I can see this becoming a very useful tool, especially for the offshore cruisers and single-handed sailors. It became a requirement for all commercial vessels on the St. Seaway/Great Lakes last year. I thought it was kind of a waste of money to install it on the ferry I ride twice a day, there's a cable ferry not too far from my home (five miles), they have to install one, the boat holds three cars (small ones at that) and plies a course of about 300 metres! Whoever makes these systems is probably fairly happy with the Canadian Government. Cheers Marty This is an IMO requirement, in the main. Possibly, individual governments are opting for early implementing of some aspects and I believe I'm hearing of some concerns regarding cost and need for the system on some vessels, such as the one you mention. When it's totally up and running and the cost come down, although I think it will still be too costly for the average boater, at least they should have the ability to have a receiver to make use of the info available. otn |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
AIS
"otnmbrd" wrote in message link.net... This is an IMO requirement, in the main. Aren't all IMO requirements "in the main"? Regards Donal -- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
AIS
Donal wrote: "otnmbrd" wrote in message link.net... This is an IMO requirement, in the main. Aren't all IMO requirements "in the main"? Yes .... and no. The IMO is still a developing body. The point is, that this is not just a Canadian Gov. issue. Different "Port States" will tend to argue over various points of implementation which can and will cause some delays in total implementation, and/or might change the final way that some vessels may be required or not required to comply. Although many of the requirements are in place and equipment is installed, I don't think we've heard the last as to how this will work for everyone. otn |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
AIS
"otnmbrd" wrote in message hlink.net... Donal wrote: "otnmbrd" wrote in message link.net... This is an IMO requirement, in the main. Aren't all IMO requirements "in the main"? Yes .... and no. The IMO is still a developing body. The point is, that this is not just a Canadian Gov. issue. Different "Port States" will tend to argue over various points of implementation which can and will cause some delays in total implementation, and/or might change the final way that some vessels may be required or not required to comply. [cough cough] Sorry to interrupt .... but ... "main" means "sea". "Aren't all IMO requirements "in the main"?" was meant to be a *joke*. Think about it, "main"="sea"..... Geddit? No, I thought not. I give up.... I'm obviously ****ing straight into the wind. There is absolutely no point whatsoever in posting here. My talents are completely wasted. None of you understand a bloody word that I write. What's the point, eh? Although many of the requirements are in place and equipment is installed, I don't think we've heard the last as to how this will work for everyone. I know,..... I know. [sigh]. Perhaps I can help. In about 4 years, NMEA compatible receivers will be available for about $100. 4 years after that, the transcievers will only cost $100. Regards Donal -- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
AIS
Donal wrote:
"otnmbrd" wrote in message link.net... This is an IMO requirement, in the main. Aren't all IMO requirements "in the main"? Usually "Upon", unless of course you are "in" a submerged submarine. ;-) Cheers Marty |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
AIS
"Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... Donal wrote: "otnmbrd" wrote in message link.net... This is an IMO requirement, in the main. Aren't all IMO requirements "in the main"? Usually "Upon", unless of course you are "in" a submerged submarine. ;-) I stand corrected! I'm also relieved by the fact that somebody understands the nonsense that I write. Regards Donal -- |