"John.E" wrote in message
...

"Donal" wrote in message
...

validate a time line if needed. Took my YM offshore practical about 12
months after that, did my Ocean qualifier about 3 months after that
(theory
already bagged on project) but never did the oral as I just ain't so
hot
with a sextant and sight reduction tables.

I'm confused. Are you saying that you haven't got a YMO?

Which bit of "Took my YM offshore practical about 12 months after that"
confused you?


I somehow got the impression that you were claiming to have done the
"Yachtmaster.Ocean" a couple of posts back.


Keep them clean. You'll be able to use them in about a week!


Can't be bothered. From your reluctance to answer it seems even more likey
you just full of it.

It will be worth the wait, honestly.




BTW, do you know of a company whose name begins with Q?
Don't waste time thinking about the question. It either makes complete
sense, or none.


Makes no sense!

Whew! I didn't want to have a row with someone that I might know.



Come on, put up or shut up. Your evasion is getting tedious and merely
further reinforces the impression that you a faker, or to use your own
parlance, a LIAR!

I said that you will be able to use your cutlery in a week.

It's more fun this way. I *will* answer your questions within the week.
I promise.


Regards


Donal
--

Donal,

My claim was to have taken the Yachtmater Exam that included the topic of
descussion, Blind Navigation. As I believe your claim was! As there is no
blind nav' on the Ocean course, either theory or practical, assuming you
have completed one or either (can't do Ocean without Offshore in any case)
then your provarication over confusion as to Offshore or Ocean still further
digs the hole you currently sitting in.

I am becoming more sceptical as to why is going to take still more time to
ID you certificate. Is this so can check for an appropriate name in the
correct time frame? After all, IF YOU do hold the ticket it is simply a case
of posting a number. This should only take moments should it not?

Come on, as I have said before, post it now and lets put this fantasy of
your to sleep...

I know what I have done, make no issues over my strengths of failings, or
the level of my certifaction. Why is it you still can't do such a simple
thig?

JohnE

"John.E" wrote in message
...
Donal,

snip

I am becoming more sceptical as to why is going to take still more time to
ID you certificate. Is this so can check for an appropriate name in the
correct time frame? After all, IF YOU do hold the ticket it is simply a
case
of posting a number. This should only take moments should it not?


Correct.


Come on, as I have said before, post it now and lets put this fantasy of
your to sleep...

I know what I have done, make no issues over my strengths of failings, or
the level of my certifaction. Why is it you still can't do such a simple
thig?


You are suffering from the delusion that I owe you any kind of response at
all.

Imagine that you walk into a strange pub. You overhear part of an argument
between two of the regulars. Would you introduce yourself by immediately
attacking the integrity of one of the participants?

That is exactly what you appear to have done here. Even worse, you have
incorrectly questioned my integrity.
You have behaved with outrageous impertinence, and I feel that you might
learn some manners if I treat you the same way.

As I have repeatedly said, I will prove you wrong within the next 6 days. I
deserve to get a little pleasure from the exercise.

Keep the cutlery ready!



Regards


Donal
--

"Donal" wrote in message
...
Imagine that you walk into a strange pub. You overhear part of an argument
between two of the regulars. Would you introduce yourself by immediately
attacking the integrity of one of the participants?

Are you taking the moral high ground?

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

Thanks, I needed a good laugh. Its -8F outside now. I can't go for a sail
because the harbor is frozen.

"Jeff Morris" wrote in message
...

"Donal" wrote in message
...
Imagine that you walk into a strange pub. You overhear part of an
argument
between two of the regulars. Would you introduce yourself by
immediately
attacking the integrity of one of the participants?

Are you taking the moral high ground?

Absolutely, and unreservedly!



BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

Don't laugh too much, or too soon.



Thanks, I needed a good laugh. Its -8F outside now. I can't go for a
sail
because the harbor is frozen.

I thought that you motorsailed everywhere?



Regards


Donal
--

Are you taking the moral high ground?

Absolutely, and unreservedly!


Sorry, I used to have some respect for you, but you've used that up lately.



BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

Don't laugh too much, or too soon.


Why not? Regardless of the truth, your behaviour has been laughable!
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!




Thanks, I needed a good laugh. Its -8F outside now. I can't go for a
sail because the harbor is frozen.

I thought that you motorsailed everywhere?


It is ironic that while my current boat is the fastest I've had, and I've put a
lot of hours on the engines. Of course, I've done inland waterways from Toronto
to Key West. However, last year we were able to sail most of the time, once out
of the harbor. The cat just needs a bit of searoom to make it fun.

"Donal" wrote in message
...

snip

You are suffering from the delusion that I owe you any kind of response at
all.


Not at all. It just seems that if you talk the talk, as you do, then from
time to time you may have to walk the walk. That may include producing
evience of you claims from time to time. Life is a bitch but not everyone
will believe all you say, particularly when some flawed info is put about.
If you should choose not to respond, fine, but do not expect everyone to
concider your claims true and be prepared to be challanged in public.

Imagine that you walk into a strange pub. You overhear part of an
argument
between two of the regulars. Would you introduce yourself by immediately
attacking the integrity of one of the participants?

This not a strange pub. It is a public forum, PUBLIC FORUM being the
operative words. If you want to brag and advice in confidence then why post
to a public environment? And as for attack the integrity of the
participants, yep, but I called you a faker initially (fairly mellow term),
I believe you have bandied the phrase LIAR in your earlier posts,
provocative or what. For my sins I fell to your level over that one.

That is exactly what you appear to have done here. Even worse, you have
incorrectly questioned my integrity.

Not at all. You make claims you can not or will not support in a public
place. Be prepared to be challanged. You miss quoted the conditions for the
RYA Yachtmaster Offshore blind nav' test. As one who has taken and past this
exam I feel I am entitled to correct you and even question the validity of
your claims.

You have behaved with outrageous impertinence, and I feel that you might
learn some manners if I treat you the same way.

Mmmm. I doubt you could teach me manners, as indeed I doubt you could teach
others to sail. To teach one must command respect, for you and your yarns I
have little to none.

As I have repeatedly said, I will prove you wrong within the next 6 days.
I
deserve to get a little pleasure from the exercise.

Well, I will keep watching, but I am a sceptical as ever abouth the truth of
your claims. This scepticism is ever more reinforced byt your total lack of
ability to respond to any question put to you with regaurds to the topic
under descussion, i.e. Yacht Master Offshore and the RYA exam it entails.

Keep the cutlery ready!

All ready back in the draw. As I have said, the information you require
could probably be extracted from public records in the number of days you
wish the group to wait so would in fairness carry little on no weight for
myself and possibly others.

Regards


Donal
--

JohnE

"John.E" wrote in message
...

"Donal" wrote in message
...

snip

You are suffering from the delusion that I owe you any kind of response
at
all.


Not at all. It just seems that if you talk the talk, as you do, then from
time to time you may have to walk the walk. That may include producing
evience of you claims from time to time. Life is a bitch but not everyone
will believe all you say, particularly when some flawed info is put about.
If you should choose not to respond, fine, but do not expect everyone to
concider your claims true and be prepared to be challanged in public.

Imagine that you walk into a strange pub. You overhear part of an
argument
between two of the regulars. Would you introduce yourself by
immediately
attacking the integrity of one of the participants?

This not a strange pub. It is a public forum, PUBLIC FORUM being the
operative words. If you want to brag and advice in confidence then why
post
to a public environment? And as for attack the integrity of the
participants, yep, but I called you a faker initially (fairly mellow
term),
I believe you have bandied the phrase LIAR in your earlier posts,
provocative or what. For my sins I fell to your level over that one.

Oh, pleeeasse! Are you really so naive as to think that "faker" is fairly
mellow?

Calling me a faker is accusing me of deception.

If I prove, beyond all doubt, that I am not a faker, would that mean that
you lied when you said that I was a faker?

If you answer "yes", then I will answer all your original questions as soon
as I read your post.



That is exactly what you appear to have done here. Even worse, you
have
incorrectly questioned my integrity.

Not at all. You make claims you can not or will not support in a public
place. Be prepared to be challanged.

I am. Believe me.

You miss quoted the conditions for the
RYA Yachtmaster Offshore blind nav' test. As one who has taken and past
this
exam I feel I am entitled to correct you and even question the validity of
your claims.

I accepted your correction almost immediately. Perhaps you missed my post,
or you felt like trying your luck at a flame war.



You have behaved with outrageous impertinence, and I feel that you might
learn some manners if I treat you the same way.

Mmmm. I doubt you could teach me manners, as indeed I doubt you could
teach
others to sail. To teach one must command respect, for you and your yarns
I
have little to none.

"Yarns"? Are you calling me a liar again? I am truly impressed by your
level of stupidity.



As I have repeatedly said, I will prove you wrong within the next 6
days.
I
deserve to get a little pleasure from the exercise.

Well, I will keep watching, but I am a sceptical as ever abouth the truth
of
your claims. This scepticism is ever more reinforced byt your total lack
of
ability to respond to any question put to you with regaurds to the topic
under descussion, i.e. Yacht Master Offshore and the RYA exam it entails.

It isn't "lack of ability". It is "lack of accountability".
I don't owe you an answer. In fact I don't owe you anything at all. I've
chosen to answer your questions after a suitable delay because I wanted to
see you dig a really deep hole for yourself. I had allowed 7 days for you
to demonstrate the true depths of your ignorance. However, it seems that
you might have accomplished the task in much less. Congratulations!!



Keep the cutlery ready!

All ready back in the draw. As I have said, the information you require
could probably be extracted from public records in the number of days you
wish the group to wait so would in fairness carry little on no weight for
myself and possibly others.

Am I a faker?
What is the difference between a faker and a liar?
Did you call me a faker?



Regards

Donal
--

"Donal" wrote in message
...
Calling me a faker is accusing me of deception.

If I prove, beyond all doubt, that I am not a faker, would that mean that
you lied when you said that I was a faker?

If you answer "yes", then I will answer all your original questions as soon
as I read your post.


Are you actually claiming John "lied" when he suggested you are a faker? You
should be pleased! You were trying your best to act like a fool, weren't you?



As I have repeatedly said, I will prove you wrong within the next 6
days.

You're even trying to out do Boobsprit!

-jeff

"Jeff Morris" wrote in message
...

"Donal" wrote in message
...
Calling me a faker is accusing me of deception.

If I prove, beyond all doubt, that I am not a faker, would that mean
that
you lied when you said that I was a faker?

If you answer "yes", then I will answer all your original questions as
soon
as I read your post.


Are you actually claiming John "lied" when he suggested you are a faker?
You
should be pleased! You were trying your best to act like a fool, weren't
you?



As I have repeatedly said, I will prove you wrong within the next 6
days.

You're even trying to out do Boobsprit!


Jeff, I find it really odd that you cannot see the real situation. You are
going to be part of my proof that JohnE lied. Isn't that wonderful?

I'm sorry that you invited yourself into this little debacle. I bore you no
ill will. However, it was your choice.

It's funny, but I had seen you as a serious poster. Now, I see that you
allow your thoughts to be governed by your preconceptions.

Let me explain.

You tried to say that Joe was right about keeping a "Radar" only lookout,
while doing 25 kts in fog. You retracted your position as soon as it was
pointed out to you that the CollRegs expressly require a lookout "by sight
and sound".

That was an incredibly stupid situation to get yourself into. ...
Especially for someone who thinks that he understands the CollRegs.

How could someone as intelligent as you make such a stupid mistake?

I believe that your preconceptions led you to believe that I was
bul****ting. If I'm wrong, then please tell us why you think that it is OK
to do 25kts in thick fog, using radar as your only means of keeping a
lookout.



Regards


Donal
--




Regards


Donal
--