Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote in message
amazingly well. If the chop increases and flow in both air and water gets turbulent, they loose their efficiency and lower aspect rigs, and keels that are stubbier & swept back are the best. Also in chop, lighter boats can be stopped by a wave. The light weight water ballasted Mini-Transat boats use ballast, not just for increasing righting moment but to maintain inertia--the added mass keeps them moving. I agree a broader keel would be less likely to stall in turbulent conditions. Why is it better for such keels to be swept back? Bart Senior |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dictionary of Paddling Terms :-) | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
offshore fishing | General | |||
I need your advice for a new boat | Cruising |