Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bart,
James question should be answered. It was a good question. Define WEATHERLY? That is very important to be clear on what is meant by Weatherly. Doug's answer explains a boats ability to go to "weather" Jeff indicated VMG. They are only part of a good weatherly Boat. In the last Am Cup Race, the KIWI"s had a boat that could go to wind at a great angle. The POS needed full pumps and a man with a bucket to get rid of the stern wave. Any cruiser, worth his "Salt" would give away a little VMG for a dry boat that will get up wind reasonable in a dry, comfortable fashion. When beating into the wind for a couple of days, VMG isn't as important as a dry boat that doesn't pound your teeth out. A boat that will trim out at a decent heel (About 15 to 20 deg) that doesn't pull your arm out of your shoulder socket with windward helm. A boat that will let you fry an egg in the galley that is nearly round while climbing on the wind near or on a 45 deg heading into the wind. Some of us Ole Timers would call a boat that tacks thru 100 deg that has the other point a very, very satisfactory "Weatherly Vessel" A boat that can be trimmed with back stay tension, cunningham and maybe barbar hauled sheet (If necessary) a weatherly rig. No jacks or sail changes. That would be a Weatherly rig A Hull shaped so that it wouldn't round up in a 25 Deg heel and carry a neutral helm. A helm that would add enough reserved buoyancy in a heel to keep the hull close to under the sail to maintain a heading If it had all these characteristics and sailed like a witch would be perfect! Would you like to see the pictures of "Peunma" again? Ole Thom |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote in message
amazingly well. If the chop increases and flow in both air and water gets turbulent, they loose their efficiency and lower aspect rigs, and keels that are stubbier & swept back are the best. Also in chop, lighter boats can be stopped by a wave. The light weight water ballasted Mini-Transat boats use ballast, not just for increasing righting moment but to maintain inertia--the added mass keeps them moving. I agree a broader keel would be less likely to stall in turbulent conditions. Why is it better for such keels to be swept back? Bart Senior |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jeff Morris" wrote
http://www.americascupcharters.com/2us17.htm These are some of the most beautiful boats sailing. I used to watch these yachts "pretend to race" every day when I worked in Newport. I have a general policy of not paying for "rides" otherwise I'd try one of these. Still I highly recommend them. It's a great idea for a date. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why a Mast head Rig?
He is probably a lot like me. That is what I'm use to. A mast head balances better while cruising. That's my opinion and it is just my opinion, for what its worth. I've sailed on 3/4 rigs, and have to admit, the ability of watching that rig automatically flatten the main in a puff does make me green with envy. No helm correction needed during or after. Nice! I've often wondered how it would preform on Main alone? My boat sails just fine. No excessive weather helm. I know some fractional rigs won't. I know my rig and am at ease with it Ole Thom |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote
What makes a boat 'weatherly?' Firstly, an effective rig... most importantly one that can be shaped and sheeted inboard for maintaining drive at an angle close to the wind. One big improvement that can be made in many production boats is to put on a proper jib/genoa sheet track to bring the sheet lead inboard. Sheeting to the toerail ain't gonna get it (in most boats). Using a second jib sheet to place the jib clue where you want it is an option--like a barber hauler only pulling inboard. This only works if the shrouds don't get in the way! Usually, the jib tracks are located as far inboard as the shrouds will allow, and barberhaulers are used to pull the jib clue outboard when sailing more off the wind. So it all depends on what you are using for a head sail. A small jib with it's clue forward of the shrouds could be controlled more accurately using this method, with jib sheet chafing at the shrouds. Bart Senior |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N1EE" wrote in message om... I think the most import issue regarding having a weatherly boat is the ability to claw off a lee shore--that is survivability. So you brought up a very good point Thom! Points to you. If you are freezing cold, wet, seasick, and hungry, the upwind performance of the boat will not matter much. I've been wondering about the definition of "weatherly" since this question was posed [ one point Bart]. A couple of years ago, I was on a friend's 42' Bavaria. It was February, and we were beating into an F5 under sail and 50 hp engine. I was very aware of the fact that we were slamming much less than Setanta would have been, under the same circumstances. The main difference was the extra waterline length. The extra weight was also noticable. So, to answer your original question, I would say that waterline length is the most important factor. Regards Donal -- |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N1EE wrote:
Also in chop, lighter boats can be stopped by a wave. True. And while it is possible to foot off and regain some VMG, usually you can't regain all of it. The light weight water ballasted Mini-Transat boats use ballast, not just for increasing righting moment but to maintain inertia--the added mass keeps them moving. They also shift the center of mass forward, put the bow down. I agree a broader keel would be less likely to stall in turbulent conditions. Why is it better for such keels to be swept back? I don't really know how it works, but swept back foils are more resistant to stalling. Anther keel shape you might notice some time is that many fin keels are tapered in profile to the bottom edge, but they are not tapered in section. The chord gets shorter and the camber gets fatter. This does two things, it reduce turbulence off the bottom edge and makes the lower secton harder to stall, and gets more ballast down low. BTW I thought Frank's answer was good. Much shorter and to the point than my rambling posts. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"N1EE" wrote ...
I think the most import issue regarding having a weatherly boat is the ability to claw off a lee shore--that is survivability. Agreed, it is a very important ability especially in a cruiser that goes into out of the way anchorages. So you brought up a very good point Thom! Points to you. If you are freezing cold, wet, seasick, and hungry, the upwind performance of the boat will not matter much. I dunno... seems to me that being cold, wet, seasick, hungry, and getting bashed into rocks on a lee shore would be worse. Donal wrote: I've been wondering about the definition of "weatherly" since this question was posed [ one point Bart]. A couple of years ago, I was on a friend's 42' Bavaria. It was February, and we were beating into an F5 under sail and 50 hp engine. I was very aware of the fact that we were slamming much less than Setanta would have been, under the same circumstances. The main difference was the extra waterline length. The extra weight was also noticable. So, to answer your original question, I would say that waterline length is the most important factor. Bigger is better, but it ain't evrything. The old square riggers were much longer on the waterline than any modern sailboats, and they were not weatherly at all by comparison. Look up the term 'embayed' and think if this has happened to you or anyone you know sailing a modern small boat. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dictionary of Paddling Terms :-) | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
offshore fishing | General | |||
I need your advice for a new boat | Cruising |