Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message ... "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Listen to President Bush's many speeches and even a closed- minded individual such as yourself will be forced to conclude that WMDs were only one of the several reasons we included Iraq in our larger war against terrorists. Americans are aware of this and it is one of the main reasons Mr. Bush has the support of close to 60% of Americans polled in this matter. Which poll? I thought the latest polls show around 50% of americans aren't willing to suffer the moron for another term. snip trolling From: http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/NewsStory...orld&OID=40615 "The poll found that in the two days after Saddam's capture, Bush's overall approval rating rose six points to 58 percent, the highest level since last July, and up from 52 percent in the four days before the former Iraqi leader's arrest. " No doubt the poll was carried out in the state of Florida, and subject to 'recounts' until he approved the result? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:35:18 GMT, "Chris" wrote
this crap: Which poll? I thought the latest polls show around 50% of americans aren't willing to suffer the moron for another term. Mr. Bush is stumbling left and right, and just watch what happens when he opens his stupid mouth endorsing that bill banning homosexuals from marriage. The Bush administration is a sinking ship, and you Simon, are a sinking troll. The following is the results of the latest CBS poll, which shows that "Don't Know" is leading the democrats. This is ironic because Don't Know actually has a better chance of beating President George W. Bush than Coward Dean. CHOICE FOR DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE (Democratic primary voters) Now Howard Dean 23% Wesley Clark 10% Joe Lieberman 10% Richard Gephardt 6% Al Sharpton 5% John Kerry 4% John Edwards 2% Carol Moseley-Braun 1% Dennis Kucinich 1% Don’t Know 28% This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Horvath" wrote in message ... The following is the results of the latest CBS poll, which shows that "Don't Know" is leading the democrats. This is ironic because Don't Know actually has a better chance of beating President George W. Bush than Coward Dean. Oddly enough, "don't know, don't tell" should be Bush's campaign slogan. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Excellent work, Neal. Your posts demonstrate a truly superior intellect!! Listen to President Bush's many speeches Only a true genius can understand Bush's speeches. The rest of us think that he is speaking gobbledeegook. You must be really clever if you can understand what he says. and even a closed- minded individual such as yourself will be forced to conclude that WMDs were only one of the several reasons we included Iraq in our larger war against terrorists. Nope! I'm afraid that after we listen to Bush speak for more than 30 seconds, we conclude that he is a complete idiot. After 60 seconds, we conclude that he is an incredibly dangerous idiot. Americans are aware of this and it is one of the main reasons Mr. Bush has the support of close to 60% of Americans polled in this matter. 60% of Americans must be illiterate! Americans don't give a hoot what a bunch of European socialists have to say. What do they know about it? What right do any such pacifists have to tell the United States of America how to prosecute the war against terrorism? We will do what is in our best interest and to Hell with all you busybodies sticking your snotty noses where they don't belong. heh heh You don't agree with your president on this issue!! Bush recently said "Please Europe, help me in Iraq. It's all gone tewwibbly wrong. America needs your supportification." Evidence of WMD programs has been found. Dream on. Read David Kay's report. It is only a matter of time before actual WMDs are located and displayed just like it was only a matter of time before Saddam Hussein was found and just like it's only a matter time before bin Laden is found and it's just a matter of time before terrorists are crushed. But, people like you will not believe the actual evidence any more than you believe Saddam Hussein tortured and butchered up hundreds of thousands of his own people. Who has killed more innocent Iraqis? The Bush family, or Saddam's family? How many died because sanctions prevented vital drugs reaching Iraqi hospitals? Did you know that birth defects have risen 10 fold since depleted uranium was used by Bush senior? Cancer and Leukemia rates have also gone through the roof! Rather than waiting for evidence of WMDs you'd rather side with a murderous dictator and do everything you can to allow his activities to continue. Your use of politically correct invective will not fool most people. What you should have written is:- "Rather than wait for the UN inspection team to prove that Iraq did not possess WMD, Bush decided to start a war that would make his friends and family incredibly rich - and at the same time create thousands more tourists[sic] - so that he could declare even more wars to generate even more wealth for his father and his friends." Shame on you! The really sad thing is that the idiots who believe Bush aren't making a penny out of it. Regards Donal -- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Donal
wrote: "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Excellent work, Neal. Your posts demonstrate a truly superior intellect!! Listen to President Bush's many speeches Only a true genius can understand Bush's speeches. The rest of us think that he is speaking gobbledeegook. You must be really clever if you can understand what he says. and even a closed- minded individual such as yourself will be forced to conclude that WMDs were only one of the several reasons we included Iraq in our larger war against terrorists. Nope! I'm afraid that after we listen to Bush speak for more than 30 seconds, we conclude that he is a complete idiot. After 60 seconds, we conclude that he is an incredibly dangerous idiot. Americans are aware of this and it is one of the main reasons Mr. Bush has the support of close to 60% of Americans polled in this matter. 60% of Americans must be illiterate! Americans don't give a hoot what a bunch of European socialists have to say. What do they know about it? What right do any such pacifists have to tell the United States of America how to prosecute the war against terrorism? We will do what is in our best interest and to Hell with all you busybodies sticking your snotty noses where they don't belong. heh heh You don't agree with your president on this issue!! Bush recently said "Please Europe, help me in Iraq. It's all gone tewwibbly wrong. America needs your supportification." Evidence of WMD programs has been found. Dream on. Read David Kay's report. It is only a matter of time before actual WMDs are located and displayed just like it was only a matter of time before Saddam Hussein was found and just like it's only a matter time before bin Laden is found and it's just a matter of time before terrorists are crushed. But, people like you will not believe the actual evidence any more than you believe Saddam Hussein tortured and butchered up hundreds of thousands of his own people. Who has killed more innocent Iraqis? The Bush family, or Saddam's family? Saddam's by at least an order of magnitude. Want to count the number of Kurds killed by chemical weapons? How about the death toll in the Iran-Iraq war? How many died because sanctions prevented vital drugs reaching Iraqi hospitals? Lots. Who was responsible for not complying with the sanctions for PR reasons? The then Iraqi Govt. Blaming the USA for this is infantile. Did you know that birth defects have risen 10 fold since depleted uranium was used by Bush senior? Cite please. Did *you* know that chemical weapons and the resultant pollution are proven teratogenic and carcinogenic agents while DU isn't? My wife is one of Australia's leading paediatric biochemists, specialises in genetic disorders. I suspect you've been following Pilger. Cancer and Leukemia rates have also gone through the roof! True but see above. Donal, I think you're backing a loser with this line of argument. Better stick to the lack of WMD and personal observations WRT 'intelligence'. Peter Wiley |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Wiley" wrote in message . .. In article , Donal wrote: How many died because sanctions prevented vital drugs reaching Iraqi hospitals? Lots. Who was responsible for not complying with the sanctions for PR reasons? The then Iraqi Govt. Blaming the USA for this is infantile. Is it? I can understand that sanctions would prohibit the export of munitions, various raw materials, industrial goods, and high tech equipment. I don't understand why medicines should be included in the list of prohibited items. Correct me if I am wrong, but I think that it is unusual for a country to be subjected to sanctions which include medical supplies. Did you know that birth defects have risen 10 fold since depleted uranium was used by Bush senior? Cite please. Did *you* know that chemical weapons and the resultant pollution are proven teratogenic and carcinogenic agents while DU isn't? Yes, I know that. However, the increases in birth defects, and cancers, correlate with the use of DU. They do NOT correlate with Saddam's use of chemical weapons. Most of the evidence that is used to support your theory is based on the radioactivity of depleted uranium. However, DU is an extremely toxic substance in its own right. Lead and aluminium are bad for you. DU is also bad for you. My wife is one of Australia's leading paediatric biochemists, specialises in genetic disorders. I get a cup of tea in bed every morning. I suspect you've been following Pilger I admit that I recognise that name. You'll have to accept my word for the fact that I am not aware of his significance. I did a Google yesterday, and I think that I saw his name. It is possible that some of my previous post used his information. .. Cancer and Leukemia rates have also gone through the roof! True but see above. Donal, I think you're backing a loser with this line of argument. Better stick to the lack of WMD and personal observations WRT 'intelligence'. That isn't fair! You seem to be suggesting that only the rednecks should be allowed to use whacko arguements. Regards Donal -- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Responses interleaved: Listen to President Bush's many speeches and even a closed- minded individual such as yourself will be forced to conclude that WMDs were only one of the several reasons we included Iraq in our larger war against terrorists. Americans are aware of this and it is one of the main reasons Mr. Bush has the support of close to 60% of Americans polled in this matter. Americans don't give a hoot what a bunch of European socialists have to say. What do they know about it? What right do any such pacifists have to tell the United States of America how to prosecute the war against terrorism? We will do what is in our best interest and to Hell with all you busybodies sticking your snotty noses where they don't belong. Then perhaps you'll ask the US Government to stop sticking their snotty noses in to other peoples business worldwide. Evidence of WMD programs has been found. Read David Kay's report. It is only a matter of time before actual WMDs are located and displayed just like it was only a matter of time before Saddam Hussein was found and just like it's only a matter time before bin Laden is found and it's just a matter of time before terrorists are crushed. How much time will it take for you to admit you're barking up the wrong tree. You can't win a war of ideas with guns. If WMDs are found it will be because the CIA put them there to help Geprge Bush win the next election. But, people like you will not believe the actual evidence any more than you believe Saddam Hussein tortured and butchered up hundreds of thousands of his own people. Rather than waiting for evidence of WMDs you'd rather side with a murderous dictator and do everything you can to allow his activities to continue. I'm afraid, yes, our Prime Minister did (against the wishes of the british people) side with a murderous dictator - George Bush! Shame on you! S.Simon |