![]() |
|
Results of coroners inquest.
Simple,
If my Jaw is the hull then the Keel has to be hooked to-----Your anology; Get your logic straight before you dig your hole any deeper OT |
Results of coroners inquest.
I guess that is why Jax checks his rigging with a Violin Bow G
Ot |
Results of coroners inquest.
click on "see demo"
http://www.cookhammer.com/new/home.html I'm sure this can be used to prove any point you want ... Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote in message ... On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 21:12:26 -0500, "Scott Vernon" scribbled thusly: Oh, pay attention next time. The lead hammer will have slightly less Only if it deforms Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote in message .. . On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 20:07:44 -0500, "Scott Vernon" scribbled thusly: what rock? anvil then.... Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote in message .. . On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 20:01:58 -0500, "Scott Vernon" scribbled thusly: Simp's correct Thom. Think of the rock as the hammer. Try hitting an anvil 100 times with a 20lb steel sledge, then do it with a 22lb plastic or rubber hammer. Scotty Then try hitting it with a lead hammer. the same force is applied to the rock. Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
Results of coroners inquest.
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:14:41 -0500, "Simple Simon"
wrote: First the idiot Oz and now you. Oh well . . . Lord but you people are daft! Allow me to do a little experiment on your jaw, you silly old fart. Let me punch you in the jaw with my fist in a boxing glove. Then, when you regain consciousness, and rub your sore jaw allow me to hit it again my balled up fist without the glove. Whereas all you lost with the fist in glove is consciousness what you lose with my balled up fist is consciousness plus a broken jaw. Your hull is your jaw. The lead keel is my fist in a glove. The cast iron keel is my balled up fist. Understand now you putz? You too, Oz you weenie. S.Simon Sorry Mr. Simon but boxing gloves are to protect the fighters hands. They do nothing to soften the effects. Modern fighters can hit harder with the gloves without breaking their hands than bareknuckle fighters. Old bareknuckle fighters used to push, shove and wrestle a lot. Most blows were to the body. Ask on rec.sport.boxing if you wish. Mark E. Williams |
Results of coroners inquest.
"Maynard G. Krebbs" wrote in message ... Sorry Mr. Simon but boxing gloves are to protect the fighters hands. They do nothing to soften the effects. Modern fighters can hit harder with the gloves without breaking their hands than bareknuckle fighters. Old bareknuckle fighters used to push, shove and wrestle a lot. Most blows were to the body. Ask on rec.sport.boxing if you wish. Mark E. Williams You, sir, are a knucklehead! Boxing gloves were required to keep boxers from killing each other regularly. An ungloved hand can and will do much more damage than a gloved hand. The ungloved hand transfers much more pounds per square inch force than a gloved hand. The ungloved hand causes much greater bone breakage of the nose, jaw and occipital orbit than the gloved hand. The bare hand causes much greater and severe cuts than does the gloved hand. I don't have to go to some lame boxing newsgroup frequented by punch-drunk retards like Mike Tyson to know that the laws of physics apply in boxing as in everything else including the fact that a lead keel softens the blow to the hull just as a boxing glove softens the blow to any fool's head who attempts to argue with me. S.Simon |
Results of coroners inquest.
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 14:54:24 -0500, "Simple Simon"
wrote: "Maynard G. Krebbs" wrote in message ... Sorry Mr. Simon but boxing gloves are to protect the fighters hands. They do nothing to soften the effects. Modern fighters can hit harder with the gloves without breaking their hands than bareknuckle fighters. Old bareknuckle fighters used to push, shove and wrestle a lot. Most blows were to the body. Ask on rec.sport.boxing if you wish. Mark E. Williams You, sir, are a knucklehead! Boxing gloves were required to keep boxers from killing each other regularly. An ungloved hand can and will do much more damage than a gloved hand. The ungloved hand transfers much more pounds per square inch force than a gloved hand. The ungloved hand causes much greater bone breakage of the nose, jaw and occipital orbit than the gloved hand. The bare hand causes much greater and severe cuts than does the gloved hand. I don't have to go to some lame boxing newsgroup frequented by punch-drunk retards like Mike Tyson to know that the laws of physics apply in boxing as in everything else including the fact that a lead keel softens the blow to the hull just as a boxing glove softens the blow to any fool's head who attempts to argue with me. S.Simon Ah, yes. Physics. As in thin finger bones smashing aginst thick skull bones. Theory aside, old-time bareknuckle fighters punched almost exclusively to the body. Mark E. Williams |
Results of coroners inquest.
Simple Simon wrote:
Hey mister toy tugboat skipper, what makes you so jealous of me? Is it because you know with your silly restored tugboat you really can't go anywhere, do anything, or even manage to fool yourself into thinking you are enjoying yourself? Sorry to take so long to reply, I just sailed into cell phone range of Ketchikan and got a connection. Yeah, I spend all my time moored to an old engine block. Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahah The only enjoyment you get out of your silly vessel is satisfaction A little jealousy of real sailors with real boats there Nil? Real men such as those of us who live aboard and cruise and voyage Bwahahahahahahahaahahahahah Gimmme a break, harldy a man, certainly not a sailor, and the only cruisng you do is on the net or riding your bike past schoolyards hoping to score ... Bwahahahahahahahaahahahah like I said before, a hazard to navigation if you ever got loose of that mooring and a marine pollutant the rest of the time. Rick |
Results of coroners inquest.
Simple Simon wrote:
The same principle applies to a lead keel. Hazard to navigation, marine pollutant and now a confirmed idiot. Geez, Nil, won't you ever quit climbing the moron ladder? Rick |
Results of coroners inquest.
Wrap your ass in lead and run that up on a reef.
Rick |
Results of coroners inquest.
So you are trying to minimise damage to the reef? How kind of you.
Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: Ever do any mechanic work? Have you ever used a brass hammer to say align a crankshaft that is pinned and pressed together? The brass hammer head deforms while the crankshaft counterweight does not. Very small movement of the counterweights can be attained instead of the large, uncontrolled movement that would knock the crankshaft out of alignment on the opposite side of the spectrum. This control and the fact the brass hammer is used because it is soft and does not damage the structure of the crankshaft as a steel hammer would is analogous to the forces applied on the hull of a boat if its keel hits an unmovable object. The same principle applies to a lead keel. The mass of lead, of course, is the primary consideration but the softness of the lead to cushion a blow is another consideration and makes lead a superior material to cast iron in addition the lead's extra mass. It is hard for me to believe you've been in the yachting field very long or done much reading to speak of without knowing this very obvious and widely known fact. S.Simon Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote in message ... On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:01:36 -0500, "Simple Simon" scribbled thusly: Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote in message ... On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:08:21 -0500, "Simple Simon" scribbled thusly: Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote in message ... On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:43:14 -0500, "Simple Simon" scribbled thusly: It's heavier but is it soft enough to cushion possible impacts with the sea bottom? Since it is used to pierce armor I've got a feeling it is pretty stout stuff. S.Simon Cushion? WTF are you talking about? You know, when a sailor runs into a rock or other hard object on the bottom - maybe a coral head it is said that lead, being soft, will cushion the blow by deforming and absorbing some of the force thus sparing the structure of the yacht. S.Simon Bwaaahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaa! Cappy that rates among the most idiotic things that you've ever written!! It did not originate with me but I can see the logic of it. Your reaction, on the other hand, is illogical. S.Simon Cappy could you fill me in on how much cushioning I could expect from say a 4 ton lump of solid lead and how it would achieve that cushioning? Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
Results of coroners inquest.
wrote in message ... Nope. SS is a lubber with no knowlege of such matters. BB Agreed! I admit I have no knowlege of such matters. I do have knowledge of such matters, however. Pretty sad when some putz claims I have no knowledge when the putz can't even spell knowledge. Bwahahahahahhahahahahha! You assholes not only don't have enough knowledge to spell knowledge but you also are too stupid to understand a simple statement such as, "Because lead is soft, when and if the keel strikes an immovable object, this soft metal absorbs more force than a hard metal does." It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize any and all force absorbed by the lead keel is that much less force transmitted to the hull and fastening hardware which translates into added integrity of the hull/keel system as a whole. S.Simon |
Results of coroners inquest.
Simple Simon wrote:
Your hull is your jaw. The lead keel is my fist Your ass is your brain. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:11 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com