They simply refuse to believe the level of meddling that the US
government is guilty of. Perhaps they would like to consider stopping
their history rewrites and learn some facts in school -like how many
innocent children and women the US bombs have killed and maimed in the
last 24 months? When the US shows some level of attrition (rather than
calling them acceptable collateral damage) the likelihood of new
terrorism will be reduced. Facts!

Cheers MC



Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote:

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:15:17 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
scribbled thusly:


Yes, it was done too soon and without the cooperation
of most of the rest of Europe and Nato. There was no
need to further burden our ecomomy, get our soldiers
killed, distract from the real war on terrorism that directly
affects us and our allies, and create an atmosphere of hate
around the world. Maybe we should have focused on
solving the N. Korean problem, or the ruination of the
environment, or the degradation of civil rights and general
conditions in Africa, or fixing what we started in Afganistan???


I think he was trying to fix what the US started in Iraq.
http://rwor.org/A/V24/1191-1200/1195/hussein.htm

"The U.S. invaders and occupiers claim to be the great deliverers of
salvation for the Iraqi people from the despotic rule of Saddam
Hussein. U.S. officials loudly denounce Hussein's crimes, and the U.S.
media obediently takes up this theme. But there is one fact that
people will not hear from the mouths of Bush, Rumsfeld, and other U.S.
spokesmen--it was the U.S. itself that was behind the rise to power of
Hussein's Ba'ath Party and that backed its brutal rule for many
years."

Cappys and Joes Tax dollars went into Saddams coffers, no wonder
they're so bitter.




Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.