"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ...
No I didn't miss it. However, I promise you that he
will spare no expense on his re-election campain
championing his "success," all the while forgetting about
the lousy planning he and Runny did before they got
there.


Johnathan I hate all the money that is spent in politics as well.

Did you have a better plan to get Saddam? Just curious.

Joe




"Joe" wrote in message
om...
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Well, this isn't their fault. It's Bushy's and Rumy's. They're now
taking
credit for something the military did. What lowlifes.

Geeee Jonathan in his speech Sunday the first thing he did was give
credit the the armed forces. Guess you missed it huh?

Even though he is the Commander and Chief.

Joe

"Milos Forman" wrote in message
nk.net...
Ahem, you are forgetting the 400 or so who paid the ultimate price to
get
us
to the point to apprehend the man.




"Thom Stewart" wrote in message
...
Well Done 4th Inif. Job well done. You got the Rat and no injuries.

You've made America Proud and I'm sure the good people of Iraq
thankful

PROUD OF YOU

Ole Thom

Yes. Actually, it wasn't my plan, it was the one Bush liked
at the beginning... stay out of foreign affairs as much as
possible, especially if the other country isn't attacking us
or is an iminant threat. Use the political machinery of
containment, which while not perfect (e.g., the 100Ks
of his own people he was butchering), at least didn't
involve reducing our credibility to the point of inviting
even more terror.

"Joe" wrote in message
om...
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
No I didn't miss it. However, I promise you that he
will spare no expense on his re-election campain
championing his "success," all the while forgetting about
the lousy planning he and Runny did before they got
there.


Johnathan I hate all the money that is spent in politics as well.

Did you have a better plan to get Saddam? Just curious.

Joe




"Joe" wrote in message
om...
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Well, this isn't their fault. It's Bushy's and Rumy's. They're now
taking
credit for something the military did. What lowlifes.

Geeee Jonathan in his speech Sunday the first thing he did was give
credit the the armed forces. Guess you missed it huh?

Even though he is the Commander and Chief.

Joe

"Milos Forman" wrote in message
nk.net...
Ahem, you are forgetting the 400 or so who paid the ultimate price
to
get
us
to the point to apprehend the man.




"Thom Stewart" wrote in message
...
Well Done 4th Inif. Job well done. You got the Rat and no
injuries.

You've made America Proud and I'm sure the good people of Iraq
thankful

PROUD OF YOU

Ole Thom

"anonymous" wrote

Saddam was a bad guy, and we probably
should have dealt with it, but there was no urgency like
what Bush and his cronies proposed.

IOW, he did the right thing but did it too soon?

Correct, he should have waited till another one of our cities got bombed.

SV

Yes, it was done too soon and without the cooperation
of most of the rest of Europe and Nato. There was no
need to further burden our ecomomy, get our soldiers
killed, distract from the real war on terrorism that directly
affects us and our allies, and create an atmosphere of hate
around the world. Maybe we should have focused on
solving the N. Korean problem, or the ruination of the
environment, or the degradation of civil rights and general
conditions in Africa, or fixing what we started in Afganistan???

"anonymous" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:37:35 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"

said:

Saddam was a bad guy, and we probably
should have dealt with it, but there was no urgency like
what Bush and his cronies proposed.

IOW, he did the right thing but did it too soon? How lame can you get?
Does
it depend on what the meaning of "is" is?

They simply refuse to believe the level of meddling that the US
government is guilty of. Perhaps they would like to consider stopping
their history rewrites and learn some facts in school -like how many
innocent children and women the US bombs have killed and maimed in the
last 24 months? When the US shows some level of attrition (rather than
calling them acceptable collateral damage) the likelihood of new
terrorism will be reduced. Facts!

Cheers MC



Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote:

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:15:17 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
scribbled thusly:


Yes, it was done too soon and without the cooperation
of most of the rest of Europe and Nato. There was no
need to further burden our ecomomy, get our soldiers
killed, distract from the real war on terrorism that directly
affects us and our allies, and create an atmosphere of hate
around the world. Maybe we should have focused on
solving the N. Korean problem, or the ruination of the
environment, or the degradation of civil rights and general
conditions in Africa, or fixing what we started in Afganistan???


I think he was trying to fix what the US started in Iraq.
http://rwor.org/A/V24/1191-1200/1195/hussein.htm

"The U.S. invaders and occupiers claim to be the great deliverers of
salvation for the Iraqi people from the despotic rule of Saddam
Hussein. U.S. officials loudly denounce Hussein's crimes, and the U.S.
media obediently takes up this theme. But there is one fact that
people will not hear from the mouths of Bush, Rumsfeld, and other U.S.
spokesmen--it was the U.S. itself that was behind the rise to power of
Hussein's Ba'ath Party and that backed its brutal rule for many
years."

Cappys and Joes Tax dollars went into Saddams coffers, no wonder
they're so bitter.




Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

So, you're really saying that none of the things I list have any importance
except to liberals.... this from someone who is "anonymous." Ok

"anonymous" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:15:17 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"

said:

Maybe we should have focused on
solving the N. Korean problem, or the ruination of the
environment, or the degradation of civil rights and general
conditions in Africa, or fixing what we started in Afganistan???

You're a hoot, Jonathan. Why didn't you include finding a cure for cancer,
heart disease and all else that ails humanity? Aren't those also subjects
near and dear to every liberal's heart? What about discovering the
fountain
of youth? Shouldn't that have come first?