Yes, it was done too soon and without the cooperation
of most of the rest of Europe and Nato. There was no
need to further burden our ecomomy, get our soldiers
killed, distract from the real war on terrorism that directly
affects us and our allies, and create an atmosphere of hate
around the world. Maybe we should have focused on
solving the N. Korean problem, or the ruination of the
environment, or the degradation of civil rights and general
conditions in Africa, or fixing what we started in Afganistan???

"anonymous" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:37:35 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"

said:

Saddam was a bad guy, and we probably
should have dealt with it, but there was no urgency like
what Bush and his cronies proposed.

IOW, he did the right thing but did it too soon? How lame can you get?
Does
it depend on what the meaning of "is" is?