On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:32:13 +1100, Donny's Dilemma wrote this
crap:

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:08:00 -0500, Horvath
wrote:

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:03:37 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

What a fool you are. It's better to let 10 people go free
than have 1 innocent person go to jail.

Hmmm. I always thought all those people on death row were convicted
criminals. I didn't know there were any innocent people in jail,

Once again Holly...you're wrong, not a little mistaken, just plain
bloody WRONG!

"Since 1973, over 100 people have been released from death rows
throughout the country after evidence of their wrongful convictions
emerged. "

What a bunch of crap. If they're on death row, they've obviously been
CONVICTED!!!!!!!!!

I especially liked the story I heard of the old man who confessed to
killing someone, and got put on death row. Later another person
confessed, and the DNA evidence showed this to be true. The first man
was released from prison. I think he should be tried again for
obstructing justice, and put back in the slammer.


Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.

at the very least he should have to compensate the state.



"Horvath" wrote in



I especially liked the story I heard of the old man who confessed to
killing someone, and got put on death row. Later another person
confessed, and the DNA evidence showed this to be true. The first man
was released from prison. I think he should be tried again for
obstructing justice, and put back in the slammer.


Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.

What an idiot you are. A conviction does not necessarily
mean the person actually did the crime. That's the point
your ninny. Too many of the *convicted* death row
inmates were found to be not guilty via DNA analysis.

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:32:13 +1100, Donny's Dilemma wrote this
crap:

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:08:00 -0500, Horvath
wrote:

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:03:37 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

What a fool you are. It's better to let 10 people go free
than have 1 innocent person go to jail.

Hmmm. I always thought all those people on death row were convicted
criminals. I didn't know there were any innocent people in jail,

Once again Holly...you're wrong, not a little mistaken, just plain
bloody WRONG!

"Since 1973, over 100 people have been released from death rows
throughout the country after evidence of their wrongful convictions
emerged. "

What a bunch of crap. If they're on death row, they've obviously been
CONVICTED!!!!!!!!!

I especially liked the story I heard of the old man who confessed to
killing someone, and got put on death row. Later another person
confessed, and the DNA evidence showed this to be true. The first man
was released from prison. I think he should be tried again for
obstructing justice, and put back in the slammer.


Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.

That's the point
your ninny.



Ninny???
Ganzy IS 100% creepy.

RB

Why don't you steal some pictures from my website and
modify them again. You're a stalker and a thief.

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
That's the point
your ninny.



Ninny???
Ganzy IS 100% creepy.

RB

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 23:24:21 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

What an idiot you are. A conviction does not necessarily
mean the person actually did the crime. That's the point
your ninny. Too many of the *convicted* death row
inmates were found to be not guilty via DNA analysis.

Don't make me laugh. There's about 35,000 people on death row, and we
hear big stories about a handful who are released on DNA evidence.
What about the 34,994 that are proven guilty?


Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.

They were all "proven" guilty. But they all weren't actually
guilty. That's what I'm not making you laugh about. You're
so incredibly stupid that I'm sure you can't see the distinction.

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 23:24:21 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

What an idiot you are. A conviction does not necessarily
mean the person actually did the crime. That's the point
your ninny. Too many of the *convicted* death row
inmates were found to be not guilty via DNA analysis.

Don't make me laugh. There's about 35,000 people on death row, and we
hear big stories about a handful who are released on DNA evidence.
What about the 34,994 that are proven guilty?


Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.