On 11 Dec 2003 01:49:30 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

Bull****Bull**** Bull**** Bull****Bull**** Bull**** Bull****

The chemicals used for lethal injections only cost a few dollars.

How can Horvath know so little. On the average it costs 3 times more to execute
someone. The legal costs involved are astronomical.

AH HA! the "legal" costs are astronomical! The actual chemicals are
cheap. So all we have to do is remove the appeals process.


Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.

How can Horvath know so little. On the average it costs 3 times more to
execute
someone. The legal costs involved are astronomical.

AH HA! the "legal" costs are astronomical! The actual chemicals are
cheap. So all we have to do is remove the appeals process.

The "point" is that you're wrong. It costs far more to execute someone. Period.
The appeals process is here to stay and for good reason.

RB

FYI:

Actual costs of execution WITHOUT legal elements:

The Department of Corrections reported a negligible fiscal impact associated
with the switch in execution method. The department would have to either build
or purchase the associated equipment. The department also reported the cost of
one execution by electrocution as follows: executioner's fee $150.00; Last Meal
$20.00; Suit and Shirt $150.00; Funeral Home $525.00; and security overtime
$1,380.00; for a total cost of $2,225.00.
The analysis spoke to the cost of administering lethal injections, which ranged
from the least expensive method such as Texas, which used medically trained
personnel to administer the lethal injection, to New Jersey, who had purchased
a computer controlled injection machine at a cost of $18,000.

RB

On 11 Dec 2003 12:26:05 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

How can Horvath know so little. On the average it costs 3 times more to
execute
someone. The legal costs involved are astronomical.

AH HA! the "legal" costs are astronomical! The actual chemicals are
cheap. So all we have to do is remove the appeals process.

The "point" is that you're wrong. It costs far more to execute someone. Period.
The appeals process is here to stay and for good reason.

You are so full of ****. You can execute someone for less than the
cost of ONE DAY in the slammer.


Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.

And, he knows from experience, having been brain dead
for quite some time.

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On 11 Dec 2003 12:26:05 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

How can Horvath know so little. On the average it costs 3 times more to
execute
someone. The legal costs involved are astronomical.

AH HA! the "legal" costs are astronomical! The actual chemicals are
cheap. So all we have to do is remove the appeals process.

The "point" is that you're wrong. It costs far more to execute someone.
Period.
The appeals process is here to stay and for good reason.

You are so full of ****. You can execute someone for less than the
cost of ONE DAY in the slammer.


Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.

Stupid fascist.

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On 11 Dec 2003 01:49:30 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

Bull****Bull**** Bull**** Bull****Bull**** Bull**** Bull****

The chemicals used for lethal injections only cost a few dollars.

How can Horvath know so little. On the average it costs 3 times more to
execute
someone. The legal costs involved are astronomical.

AH HA! the "legal" costs are astronomical! The actual chemicals are
cheap. So all we have to do is remove the appeals process.


Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.