"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Can Bush Be Both Ignorant and a Liar?
Yes. There's no reason for Bush-bashers to choose between the two.
By Timothy Noah
Posted Monday, June 23, 2003, at 2:31 PM PT

In fact, it has yet to be proved that the two mobile labs were used (or
even
designed to be used) to build biological weapons.

In fact the two "mobile labs" have been positively identified. They were
British built artillery Training Support Vehicles.

There was nothing suspicious about them at all! Perhaps Fox News didn't
feel that the truth was worth reporting.


Regards


Donal
--

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 23:32:20 -0000, "Donal"
wrote:


"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Can Bush Be Both Ignorant and a Liar?
Yes. There's no reason for Bush-bashers to choose between the
two. By Timothy Noah
Posted Monday, June 23, 2003, at 2:31 PM PT

In fact, it has yet to be proved that the two mobile labs were
used (or
even
designed to be used) to build biological weapons.

In fact the two "mobile labs" have been positively identified.
They were British built artillery Training Support Vehicles.

[snip]

Donal

Firearms deer-hunting was open here last week. Funny, that store
managers won't let me carry my deer rifle around in the clothing
store when I look for some warm socks. After all, my rifle was
designed as a deer rifle--no deer in the store--and so could never
be used for anything else, right?

If WMD equipment couldn't be (falsely) assigned a benign purpose,
the Iraqis simply didn't buy it. They weren't stupid. I don't know
who's right about the trucks, but it's not as simple as you make it
sound.

two wheels


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQA/AwUBP76sGdCBA23eyf45EQJY5wCghzkfqZ5xAoC/+upiTmyrFSKZnwsAn2VN
yLc2aCIDuP0M/ivJlIQ1D/2k
=bSZ6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"two wheels" wrote in message
...

Firearms deer-hunting was open here last week. Funny, that store
managers won't let me carry my deer rifle around in the clothing
store when I look for some warm socks. After all, my rifle was
designed as a deer rifle--no deer in the store--and so could never
be used for anything else, right?




If WMD equipment couldn't be (falsely) assigned a benign purpose,
the Iraqis simply didn't buy it. They weren't stupid. I don't know
who's right about the trucks, but it's not as simple as you make it
sound.

Why not? The trucks were built with a single purpose in mind. They hadn't
been modified. They were only capable of performing a single function.

Don't you think that it is time that you considered the possibility that the
rest of the world *might* be right about this?

Do you really believe that Blix is wrong? Do you really believe that major
weaponry can be produced without big industrial installations?


There is NO evidence that Saddam had WMD for one simple reason. Why are you
unable to think about this?



Regards


Donal
--

There is NO evidence that Saddam had WMD for one simple reason. Why are you
unable to think about this?

Because the obvious truth about the lack of WMD and that would lead to another
obvious truth...that Bush lied. And that lie has been costly indeed.

RB