LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Simple Simon
 
Posts: n/a
Default performance question

That's not much sail. Such a boat would be very slow
except in strong winds.

S.Simon


wrote in message ...
If a sailboat weighed 4960 pounds, and had a sail area of 120 square feet, would
it be fast or slow? Would it be considered over-canvased, or woefully
under-canvased? Are there any boats made that roughly fit this configuration?
Are they high performance boats?

BB



  #2   Report Post  
The_navigator©
 
Posts: n/a
Default performance question

As a first order calculation, one can assume the wetted area goes as the
2/3 power of the displacement volume (D). (D is weight in pounds
divided by 64). It is the friction of this wetted area that the sail
must compensate for. Thus on a racing yacht we might have A/D^2/3 ~ 22,
a cruiser ~12. You boat would be ~7 and very slow except in high winds.
These figues can be adjusted for form by the designer.

Cheers MC

wrote:

If a sailboat weighed 4960 pounds, and had a sail area of 120 square feet, would
it be fast or slow? Would it be considered over-canvased, or woefully
under-canvased? Are there any boats made that roughly fit this configuration?
Are they high performance boats?

BB


  #3   Report Post  
Bobsprit
 
Posts: n/a
Default performance question

If a sailboat weighed 4960 pounds, and had a sail area of 120 square feet,
would
it be fast or slow? Would it be considered over-canvased, or woefully
under-canvased?


Bill is refering to the original design of the Coronado 27 before neal added
his 452% genoa.

RB
  #4   Report Post  
Jeff Morris
 
Posts: n/a
Default performance question

This would have a SA/Disp ratio of under 7. There are only a handful of vessels even
close to being this under-canvassed - most of them motorsailors or other specialty boats.


wrote in message
...
If a sailboat weighed 4960 pounds, and had a sail area of 120 square feet, would
it be fast or slow? Would it be considered over-canvased, or woefully
under-canvased? Are there any boats made that roughly fit this configuration?
Are they high performance boats?

BB



  #5   Report Post  
Bobsprit
 
Posts: n/a
Default performance question

Actually, I'm referring to the sluggish C&C 32.

The difference between my C&C 27-5 and Suzanne's C&C 32...

C&C 27 MK 5 Low PHRF....180
C&C 32 low PHRF....150

But thanks for the birthday wish!
Say, Bill...off topic and character for a moment, do you think a "new" C&C
meeting on the LIS would generate some interest? I've spoken to a few 30 and 33
owners who wonder why we don't have a meeting locally.

RB


  #6   Report Post  
Donal
 
Posts: n/a
Default performance question


"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Actually, I'm referring to the sluggish C&C 32.

The difference between my C&C 27-5 and Suzanne's C&C 32...

C&C 27 MK 5 Low PHRF....180
C&C 32 low PHRF....150


F33.7 PHRF???????


When does Suzzy get her new boat?

Regards


Donal
--



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LORD NELSON 41 QUESTION [email protected] Cruising 4 May 12th 04 11:45 AM
Stainless Prop selection question Christopher Rugg General 2 April 12th 04 09:13 PM
Outboard Performance Accessories JGK General 7 April 3rd 04 04:27 AM
Another strip-plank question - a bit long Pete Boat Building 3 January 12th 04 08:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017