Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's not much sail. Such a boat would be very slow
except in strong winds. S.Simon wrote in message ... If a sailboat weighed 4960 pounds, and had a sail area of 120 square feet, would it be fast or slow? Would it be considered over-canvased, or woefully under-canvased? Are there any boats made that roughly fit this configuration? Are they high performance boats? BB |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a first order calculation, one can assume the wetted area goes as the
2/3 power of the displacement volume (D). (D is weight in pounds divided by 64). It is the friction of this wetted area that the sail must compensate for. Thus on a racing yacht we might have A/D^2/3 ~ 22, a cruiser ~12. You boat would be ~7 and very slow except in high winds. These figues can be adjusted for form by the designer. Cheers MC wrote: If a sailboat weighed 4960 pounds, and had a sail area of 120 square feet, would it be fast or slow? Would it be considered over-canvased, or woefully under-canvased? Are there any boats made that roughly fit this configuration? Are they high performance boats? BB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If a sailboat weighed 4960 pounds, and had a sail area of 120 square feet,
would it be fast or slow? Would it be considered over-canvased, or woefully under-canvased? Bill is refering to the original design of the Coronado 27 before neal added his 452% genoa. RB |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This would have a SA/Disp ratio of under 7. There are only a handful of vessels even
close to being this under-canvassed - most of them motorsailors or other specialty boats. wrote in message ... If a sailboat weighed 4960 pounds, and had a sail area of 120 square feet, would it be fast or slow? Would it be considered over-canvased, or woefully under-canvased? Are there any boats made that roughly fit this configuration? Are they high performance boats? BB |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, I'm referring to the sluggish C&C 32.
The difference between my C&C 27-5 and Suzanne's C&C 32... C&C 27 MK 5 Low PHRF....180 C&C 32 low PHRF....150 But thanks for the birthday wish! Say, Bill...off topic and character for a moment, do you think a "new" C&C meeting on the LIS would generate some interest? I've spoken to a few 30 and 33 owners who wonder why we don't have a meeting locally. RB |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Actually, I'm referring to the sluggish C&C 32. The difference between my C&C 27-5 and Suzanne's C&C 32... C&C 27 MK 5 Low PHRF....180 C&C 32 low PHRF....150 F33.7 PHRF??????? When does Suzzy get her new boat? Regards Donal -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LORD NELSON 41 QUESTION | Cruising | |||
Stainless Prop selection question | General | |||
Outboard Performance Accessories | General | |||
Another strip-plank question - a bit long | Boat Building |