![]() |
|
Ferry Speeds
9-16 knots = Slow moving passenger Ferry 17-24 knots = Standard 26-49 knots = High Speed 50 and up = Ultra High Speed I found this with ease and it's in the 2004 expanded Chapmans. Sorry, Billy! RB |
Ferry Speeds
I found this with ease and it's in the 2004 expanded Chapmans.
Sorry, Billy! Glad you were finally able to figure it out. Apology accepted! Sorry, Billy...I made it up!!! Shhhhaaaawinggggg!!! Bwahahahaaha! RB |
Ferry Speeds
"Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Sorry, Billy! I find it very gratifying to see a liar apologise. Well done, Bob. There is hope for you yet! Regards Donal -- |
Ferry Speeds
Subject: Ferry Speeds
From: (Bobsprit) Date: 11/18/2003 12:51 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: 9-16 knots = Slow moving passenger Ferry 17-24 knots = Standard 26-49 knots = High Speed 50 and up = Ultra High Speed Damn, my ferry used ta do 25k .... guess I was a "high standard, slow, high speed" ferry. EG talk about stupid arguments..... Actually, Boobsprit was correct on one issue. You can expect ferries to be in "lanes" (his term, not mine), but, be anywhere, with heavy traffic, shoal waters, and zero visibility, once, and tell me you'll think you don't need, or at least, didn't wish you had, radar. Shen |
Ferry Speeds
Other traffic should not need radar if only the ferry operator would follow the COLREGS and proceed at a safe speed and slow to a stop if necessary to avoid a collision. Instead, ferry operators think they can just go about their merry way at speeds too high for the visibility. Rather than abiding by the COLREGS you operators flaunt the Rules and cause accidents. S.Simon "Shen44" wrote in message ... Subject: Ferry Speeds From: (Bobsprit) Date: 11/18/2003 12:51 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: 9-16 knots = Slow moving passenger Ferry 17-24 knots = Standard 26-49 knots = High Speed 50 and up = Ultra High Speed Damn, my ferry used ta do 25k .... guess I was a "high standard, slow, high speed" ferry. EG talk about stupid arguments..... Actually, Boobsprit was correct on one issue. You can expect ferries to be in "lanes" (his term, not mine), but, be anywhere, with heavy traffic, shoal waters, and zero visibility, once, and tell me you'll think you don't need, or at least, didn't wish you had, radar. Shen |
Ferry Speeds
Subject: Ferry Speeds
From: "Simple Simon" Other traffic should not need radar if only the ferry operator would follow the COLREGS and proceed at a safe speed and slow to a stop if necessary to avoid a collision. Typical stupid statement from the "simpleton". A. You only THINK you know something about radar.....you don't. B. You only THINK you know something about how ferries operate.....you don't. C. You only THINK you know and understand the rules.....you don't. D. You only THINK you have enough time out underway on the water to be able to discuss the subject intelligently......you don't. Instead, ferry operators think they can just go about their merry way at speeds too high for the visibility. Rather than abiding by the COLREGS you operators flaunt the Rules and cause accidents. S.Simon BG You wouldn't know a ferry, if you saw one ..... come back and talk when you get some experience that includes something besides sitting at anchor in Tampa Bay. Shen |
Ferry Speeds
Ferry boats are like busses or trains. They operate on a fixed schedule and
many thousands of people depend on them to keep to that schedule. Common sense, basic politeness, if nothing else will tell you to keep out of there way. And it doesn't take more than a few minutes to Steer For The Stern rather than the bow. If nothing else re-read Rule 2. Or better yet consider them Restricted In Ability to Manuever by virtue of their job. It also depends on where the ferry is located and under which laws it's operating. In the Puget Sound and clear into Lake Washington it's International Rules. Yet ferry's make one long horn blast when backing out or departing. Why? It's common sense to warn other water traffic they are about to move. Here's another difference which applies 'on' the ferry. In Washington State they are considered part of the state highway system. All Highway traffic rules apply to the motorist. As for speed I took the hydrofoil to Victoria once and one from England to the continent. Never again. Like roller skating across railroad ties. Thumpety thumpety thumpety. MST |
Ferry Speeds
Comments debunking Capt. Shenandoah interspersed.
"Shen44" wrote in message ... Typical stupid statement from the "simpleton". A. You only THINK you know something about radar.....you don't. One does not need to know anything about the technical aspects of radar to understand how the COLREGS apply to the use of radar. B. You only THINK you know something about how ferries operate.....you don't. One need not know how ferries operate in order to understand their obligations under the Rules. C. You only THINK you know and understand the rules.....you don't. I have proven time and time again that I understand the COLREGS better than all you tugboat captains put together. If I don't understand them then the lot of you don't even know they exist. D. You only THINK you have enough time out underway on the water to be able to discuss the subject intelligently......you don't. Unlike you and the other tugboat captains, I have spent more time on the water in the past ten years than any of you and probably more than any two of you put together. I have seen, firsthand, how most motor boat professional captains are rude, and abusive of the pecking order Rules. In their minds it's always a matter of might making right and commercial interests over pleasure craft. Their minds are warped and bitter that they are almost at the very bottom of the pecking order and must give way to vessels they honestly feel are inferior to their glorified trucks ( bulk carriers, freighters, etc.) or oversized busses (ferries, cruise ships, etc.). S.Simon |
Ferry Speeds
The COLREGS don't make any mention of 'common sense'.
As far as the COLREGS go, ferries are motor vessels and must adhere to the Rules pertaining to motor vessels. This means they are the give-way in many situations whether you or they care to believe it. Their schedule and the number of people they carry has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact they are bound by the Rules to proceed in a certain manner when interacting with other vessels. They can carry a billion people all needing to get somewhere on time and that does not relieve them of their legal obligation to give way to a sailboat underway under sail. S.Simon "Schoonertrash" wrote in message ... Ferry boats are like busses or trains. They operate on a fixed schedule and many thousands of people depend on them to keep to that schedule. Common sense, basic politeness, if nothing else will tell you to keep out of there way. And it doesn't take more than a few minutes to Steer For The Stern rather than the bow. If nothing else re-read Rule 2. Or better yet consider them Restricted In Ability to Manuever by virtue of their job. It also depends on where the ferry is located and under which laws it's operating. In the Puget Sound and clear into Lake Washington it's International Rules. Yet ferry's make one long horn blast when backing out or departing. Why? It's common sense to warn other water traffic they are about to move. Here's another difference which applies 'on' the ferry. In Washington State they are considered part of the state highway system. All Highway traffic rules apply to the motorist. As for speed I took the hydrofoil to Victoria once and one from England to the continent. Never again. Like roller skating across railroad ties. Thumpety thumpety thumpety. MST |
Ferry Speeds
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:50:50 -0500, "Simple Simon"
wrote: One need not know how ferries operate in order to understand their obligations under the Rules. Spoken like an amateur of the most dangerous sort. I have proven time and time again that I understand the COLREGS better than all you tugboat captains put together. You have proven a great deal here, Nil. However, very little of that had anything to do with seafaring. Unlike you and the other tugboat captains, I have spent more time on the water in the past ten years than any of you and probably more than any two of you put together. Sleeping on a park bench does not make you a park ranger. ... warped and bitter that they are almost at the very bottom of the pecking order ... A little moment of introspection there, Nil? How's the renewal coming along? Your friends in the White House keeping the CG hustling for you? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Rick |
Ferry Speeds
In the SF bay, ferries do not have any restriction on manueverability,
except near their landings. They are required to get out of our way in the middle of the bay, and we regularly enforce the rules, which they know quite well and always follow. Of course, we don't deliberately put ourselves in their path, but neither do we shy away from sailing where we want to sail because a ferry might be going in that direction. "Schoonertrash" wrote in message ... Ferry boats are like busses or trains. They operate on a fixed schedule and many thousands of people depend on them to keep to that schedule. Common sense, basic politeness, if nothing else will tell you to keep out of there way. And it doesn't take more than a few minutes to Steer For The Stern rather than the bow. If nothing else re-read Rule 2. Or better yet consider them Restricted In Ability to Manuever by virtue of their job. It also depends on where the ferry is located and under which laws it's operating. In the Puget Sound and clear into Lake Washington it's International Rules. Yet ferry's make one long horn blast when backing out or departing. Why? It's common sense to warn other water traffic they are about to move. Here's another difference which applies 'on' the ferry. In Washington State they are considered part of the state highway system. All Highway traffic rules apply to the motorist. As for speed I took the hydrofoil to Victoria once and one from England to the continent. Never again. Like roller skating across railroad ties. Thumpety thumpety thumpety. MST |
Ferry Speeds
Correct.
There is the principle of courtesy, which all should follow however. We do and they do. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... The COLREGS don't make any mention of 'common sense'. As far as the COLREGS go, ferries are motor vessels and must adhere to the Rules pertaining to motor vessels. This means they are the give-way in many situations whether you or they care to believe it. Their schedule and the number of people they carry has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact they are bound by the Rules to proceed in a certain manner when interacting with other vessels. They can carry a billion people all needing to get somewhere on time and that does not relieve them of their legal obligation to give way to a sailboat underway under sail. S.Simon "Schoonertrash" wrote in message ... Ferry boats are like busses or trains. They operate on a fixed schedule and many thousands of people depend on them to keep to that schedule. Common sense, basic politeness, if nothing else will tell you to keep out of there way. And it doesn't take more than a few minutes to Steer For The Stern rather than the bow. If nothing else re-read Rule 2. Or better yet consider them Restricted In Ability to Manuever by virtue of their job. It also depends on where the ferry is located and under which laws it's operating. In the Puget Sound and clear into Lake Washington it's International Rules. Yet ferry's make one long horn blast when backing out or departing. Why? It's common sense to warn other water traffic they are about to move. Here's another difference which applies 'on' the ferry. In Washington State they are considered part of the state highway system. All Highway traffic rules apply to the motorist. As for speed I took the hydrofoil to Victoria once and one from England to the continent. Never again. Like roller skating across railroad ties. Thumpety thumpety thumpety. MST |
Ferry Speeds
"Rick" wrote in message ... How's the renewal coming along? Your friends in the White House keeping the CG hustling for you? It's only been a week. I expect it'll take a month to six weeks for them to send me an updated license. In the meantime, they give you a whole year's grace period so there's no hurry. S.Simon |
Ferry Speeds
Wrong! Courtesy is not even mentioned in the COLREGS.
Courtesy can only legally be abided if courtesy does not make one violate any of the Rules. The Rules tell me I MUST hold course and speed while sailing in a crossing situation with a ferry (not in a narrow channel) and they tell a ferry that as a motor vessel she must give way to a sailboat. The only situation where this does not apply is in narrow channels or if the sailboat is overtaking the ferry. S.Simon "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Correct. There is the principle of courtesy, which all should follow however. We do and they do. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... The COLREGS don't make any mention of 'common sense'. As far as the COLREGS go, ferries are motor vessels and must adhere to the Rules pertaining to motor vessels. This means they are the give-way in many situations whether you or they care to believe it. Their schedule and the number of people they carry has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact they are bound by the Rules to proceed in a certain manner when interacting with other vessels. They can carry a billion people all needing to get somewhere on time and that does not relieve them of their legal obligation to give way to a sailboat underway under sail. S.Simon "Schoonertrash" wrote in message ... Ferry boats are like busses or trains. They operate on a fixed schedule and many thousands of people depend on them to keep to that schedule. Common sense, basic politeness, if nothing else will tell you to keep out of there way. And it doesn't take more than a few minutes to Steer For The Stern rather than the bow. If nothing else re-read Rule 2. Or better yet consider them Restricted In Ability to Manuever by virtue of their job. It also depends on where the ferry is located and under which laws it's operating. In the Puget Sound and clear into Lake Washington it's International Rules. Yet ferry's make one long horn blast when backing out or departing. Why? It's common sense to warn other water traffic they are about to move. Here's another difference which applies 'on' the ferry. In Washington State they are considered part of the state highway system. All Highway traffic rules apply to the motorist. As for speed I took the hydrofoil to Victoria once and one from England to the continent. Never again. Like roller skating across railroad ties. Thumpety thumpety thumpety. MST |
Ferry Speeds
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:26:48 -0500, "Simple Simon"
wrote: ... they give you a whole year's grace period so there's no hurry. Since it is not mentioned in the COLREGS you may not be aware that you cannot use the license during the grace period. But it's not like you will make any less money with it anyway. Rick |
Ferry Speeds
Subject: Ferry Speeds
From: "Simple Simon" Date: 11/19/2003 16:57 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: The COLREGS don't make any mention of 'common sense'. This is a prime example of why we say you don't know and/or understand the "Rules". Read Rule 2, "Simpleton".....try to understand it !!! As for the rest of your comments ....true.....hey, even a "simpleton" can get some things right. Shen |
Ferry Speeds
ubject: Ferry Speeds
From: "Simple Simon" Date: 11/19/2003 17:31 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Wrong! Courtesy is not even mentioned in the COLREGS. Courtesy can only legally be abided if courtesy does not make one violate any of the Rules. The Rules tell me I MUST hold course and speed while sailing in a crossing situation with a ferry (not in a narrow channel) and they tell a ferry that as a motor vessel she must give way to a sailboat. The only situation where this does not apply is in narrow channels or if the sailboat is overtaking the ferry. S.Simon Typically, your lack of in depth knowledge of the Rules, precludes you from understanding and mentioning VTS schemes and how they would/could effect your actions. Also, quite typically, you are unable to understand, and apply any form of courtesy, to any vessel, except your own .... a prime indication of your total lack of knowledge and experience, underway, when encountering vessel traffic, which may indicate a need for you to employ "good seamanship", etc. As per usual, Simpleton, you are showing yourself to be a "phony troll wannabe". Shen |
Ferry Speeds
"Shen44" wrote in message ... Subject: Ferry Speeds From: "Simple Simon" Date: 11/19/2003 16:57 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: The COLREGS don't make any mention of 'common sense'. This is a prime example of why we say you don't know and/or understand the "Rules". Read Rule 2, "Simpleton".....try to understand it !!! Here is Rule 2 verbatim: Rule 2 Responsibility (a) Nothing in these Rules shall exonerate any vessel, or the owner, master, or crew thereof, from the consequences of any neglect to comply with these Rules or of the neglect of any precaution which may be required by the ordinary practice of seamen, or by the special circumstances of the case. (b) In construing and complying with these Rules due regard shall be had to all dangers of navigation and collision and to any special circumstances, including the limitations of the vessels involved, which may make a departure from these Rules necessary to avoid immediate danger. I've read it dozens of times and have yet to see occur the word, "common sense". S.Simon |
Ferry Speeds
Subject: Ferry Speeds
From: "Jonathan Ganz" Date: 11/19/2003 17:17 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: In the SF bay, ferries do not have any restriction on manueverability, except near their landings. They are required to get out of our way in the middle of the bay, and we regularly enforce the rules, which they know quite well and always follow. Of course, we don't deliberately put ourselves in their path, but neither do we shy away from sailing where we want to sail because a ferry might be going in that direction. BG This applies to ship traffic also ..... but, ...... EG Shen |
Ferry Speeds
It's not my fault if the authorities are slow to
process the renewal. My license remains valid until revoked. When the license renewal is processed and returned to me the date of issue of the new license will be the date of expiration of the old one. This means My license never expired and I can legally operate under the old one with while the paper work is being processed. S.Simon "Rick" wrote in message ... On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:26:48 -0500, "Simple Simon" wrote: ... they give you a whole year's grace period so there's no hurry. Since it is not mentioned in the COLREGS you may not be aware that you cannot use the license during the grace period. But it's not like you will make any less money with it anyway. Rick |
Ferry Speeds
Subject: Ferry Speeds
From: "Simple Simon" Comments debunking Capt. Shenandoah interspersed. Comments debunking the "simpleton" interspersed: "Shen44" wrote in message ... Typical stupid statement from the "simpleton". A. You only THINK you know something about radar.....you don't. One does not need to know anything about the technical aspects of radar to understand how the COLREGS apply to the use of radar. Then stick solely to the aspects of radar, which concern COLREGS .... then try to understand what COLREGS is saying about Radar....obviously, you know neither. B. You only THINK you know something about how ferries operate.....you don't. One need not know how ferries operate in order to understand their obligations under the Rules. This is a typical statement from an inexperienced amateur. The more you know about ANY type of vessel, the better you will be, at handling any situation which may arise, regarding that vessel. In your case, you're to inexperienced to realize that the most important rule, is rule 2, and you must take all the rules, PLUS, what the vessels are, into consideration, when applying the rules "It's not just the rules.... it's the situation" C. You only THINK you know and understand the rules.....you don't. I have proven time and time again that I understand the COLREGS better than all you tugboat captains put together. If I don't understand them then the lot of you don't even know they exist. You have proven time and time again, that you know some of the wording of the Rules, but little of the intent. You have shown that you are a simple beginner with minimal experience and understanding ..... a phony troll.... you get no respect and deserve less. You remind me of the guy on NYPD Blue, who was caught impersonating a police officer.... you try to impersonate a Maritime professional, with a license.....and fail miserably. D. You only THINK you have enough time out underway on the water to be able to discuss the subject intelligently......you don't. Unlike you and the other tugboat captains, I have spent more time on the water in the past ten years than any of you and probably more than any two of you put together. You total stupid idiot!! You could go sailing every day of the remainder of your life, and never approach ANYTHING, near the time I'd spent at sea, 30 years ago !! .... much less, what I spend, nowadays..... but the biggest difference is, you're too stupid to realize you're still learning, whereas I will continue to learn. I have seen, firsthand, how most motor boat professional captains are rude, and abusive of the pecking order Rules. BS You don't spend enough time underway to have seen ANYTHING!!! In their minds it's always a matter of might making right and commercial interests over pleasure craft. Their minds are warped and bitter that they are almost at the very bottom of the pecking order and must give way to vessels they honestly feel are inferior to their glorified trucks ( bulk carriers, freighters, etc.) or oversized busses (ferries, cruise ships, etc.). S.Simon ROFLMAO Simpleton, you're a rank (and I do mean RANK) amateur, who lives aboard his boat, permanently anchored out of harms way..... come back and talk when you learn to walk ..... your still crawling on yer belly Shen |
Ferry Speeds
take a month to six
weeks for them to send me an updated license. In the meantime, they give you a whole year's grace period so there's no hurry. S.S Doesn't matter, since you don't use it anyway....will take 1-2 months, I betcha.....and even then, all you'll have is a phony piece of paper which shows nothing about your real qualification......zero !! |
Ferry Speeds
God, you're stupid, have a short attention span and can't be bothered
to do some basic research before rabbiting on in your ignorance. Not so long ago we discussed this very issue. Local rules can & do override the general COLREG rules. In Sydney Harbour, ferries do *not* have to give way to sailboats. Period. I'd suspect the same situation applies to most ferries running on regular routes. Your "only situation" as below is a figment of your limited imagination. Peter Wiley In article , Simple Simon wrote: Wrong! Courtesy is not even mentioned in the COLREGS. Courtesy can only legally be abided if courtesy does not make one violate any of the Rules. The Rules tell me I MUST hold course and speed while sailing in a crossing situation with a ferry (not in a narrow channel) and they tell a ferry that as a motor vessel she must give way to a sailboat. The only situation where this does not apply is in narrow channels or if the sailboat is overtaking the ferry. S.Simon "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Correct. There is the principle of courtesy, which all should follow however. We do and they do. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... The COLREGS don't make any mention of 'common sense'. As far as the COLREGS go, ferries are motor vessels and must adhere to the Rules pertaining to motor vessels. This means they are the give-way in many situations whether you or they care to believe it. Their schedule and the number of people they carry has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact they are bound by the Rules to proceed in a certain manner when interacting with other vessels. They can carry a billion people all needing to get somewhere on time and that does not relieve them of their legal obligation to give way to a sailboat underway under sail. S.Simon "Schoonertrash" wrote in message ... Ferry boats are like busses or trains. They operate on a fixed schedule and many thousands of people depend on them to keep to that schedule. Common sense, basic politeness, if nothing else will tell you to keep out of there way. And it doesn't take more than a few minutes to Steer For The Stern rather than the bow. If nothing else re-read Rule 2. Or better yet consider them Restricted In Ability to Manuever by virtue of their job. It also depends on where the ferry is located and under which laws it's operating. In the Puget Sound and clear into Lake Washington it's International Rules. Yet ferry's make one long horn blast when backing out or departing. Why? It's common sense to warn other water traffic they are about to move. Here's another difference which applies 'on' the ferry. In Washington State they are considered part of the state highway system. All Highway traffic rules apply to the motorist. As for speed I took the hydrofoil to Victoria once and one from England to the continent. Never again. Like roller skating across railroad ties. Thumpety thumpety thumpety. MST |
Ferry Speeds
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:06:38 -0500, "Simple Simon"
wrote: I My license remains valid until revoked. If you really have a licence you can look on the lower right hand corner and it will state very clearly when it expires. On that date that piece of paper is just another piece of trash cluttering your derelict. What you believe is irrelevant as usual. RIck |
Ferry Speeds
Because of a little organization called the IRS I
will NOT claim I made almost ten grand last year using my licenses. I wonder if you can claim the same or more??? S.Simon "Shen44" wrote in message ... Doesn't matter, since you don't use it anyway....will take 1-2 months, I betcha.....and even then, all you'll have is a phony piece of paper which shows nothing about your real qualification......zero !! |
Ferry Speeds
You're the one who's not too bright.
I guess you never read the following Rule. Rule 1 (b) Nothing in these Rules shall interfere in the operation of special rules made by an appropriate authority for roadsteads, harbors, rivers, lakes or inland waterways connected with the high seas and navigable by seagoing vessels. Such special rules shall conform as closely as possible to these Rules. Any harbor rule that NEGATES the general sailing Rules does not conform as closely as possible to the Rules will be deemed illegal in a court of law. Sorry, but that's the way it goes . . . A cable ferry is one thing but a ferry that is not a RAM must obey the general sailing Rules which means pecking order applies. S.Simon "Peter Wiley" wrote in message . .. God, you're stupid, have a short attention span and can't be bothered to do some basic research before rabbiting on in your ignorance. Not so long ago we discussed this very issue. Local rules can & do override the general COLREG rules. In Sydney Harbour, ferries do *not* have to give way to sailboats. Period. I'd suspect the same situation applies to most ferries running on regular routes. Your "only situation" as below is a figment of your limited imagination. Peter Wiley In article , Simple Simon wrote: Wrong! Courtesy is not even mentioned in the COLREGS. Courtesy can only legally be abided if courtesy does not make one violate any of the Rules. The Rules tell me I MUST hold course and speed while sailing in a crossing situation with a ferry (not in a narrow channel) and they tell a ferry that as a motor vessel she must give way to a sailboat. The only situation where this does not apply is in narrow channels or if the sailboat is overtaking the ferry. S.Simon "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Correct. There is the principle of courtesy, which all should follow however. We do and they do. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... The COLREGS don't make any mention of 'common sense'. As far as the COLREGS go, ferries are motor vessels and must adhere to the Rules pertaining to motor vessels. This means they are the give-way in many situations whether you or they care to believe it. Their schedule and the number of people they carry has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact they are bound by the Rules to proceed in a certain manner when interacting with other vessels. They can carry a billion people all needing to get somewhere on time and that does not relieve them of their legal obligation to give way to a sailboat underway under sail. S.Simon "Schoonertrash" wrote in message ... Ferry boats are like busses or trains. They operate on a fixed schedule and many thousands of people depend on them to keep to that schedule. Common sense, basic politeness, if nothing else will tell you to keep out of there way. And it doesn't take more than a few minutes to Steer For The Stern rather than the bow. If nothing else re-read Rule 2. Or better yet consider them Restricted In Ability to Manuever by virtue of their job. It also depends on where the ferry is located and under which laws it's operating. In the Puget Sound and clear into Lake Washington it's International Rules. Yet ferry's make one long horn blast when backing out or departing. Why? It's common sense to warn other water traffic they are about to move. Here's another difference which applies 'on' the ferry. In Washington State they are considered part of the state highway system. All Highway traffic rules apply to the motorist. As for speed I took the hydrofoil to Victoria once and one from England to the continent. Never again. Like roller skating across railroad ties. Thumpety thumpety thumpety. MST |
Ferry Speeds
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:32:57 -0500, "Simple Simon"
wrote: Because of a little organization called the IRS I will NOT claim I made almost ten grand last year using my licenses. Which licenses were those, Nil? What did you do, drive a cab? Sell popcorn on a street corner? Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha ... Got news for you peabrain, an unlimited license is worth way more than ten grand a month you ignorant wannabe ... Rick |
Ferry Speeds
It doesn't have to be mentioned in the regs for it to be the
right and proper thing to do. To think otherwise, is to be foolish. They do not tell you that you MUST hold course. In fact, they say you MUST avoid a collision. One way to prevent the situation where one has to take evasive action is to act in a couteous manner. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Wrong! Courtesy is not even mentioned in the COLREGS. Courtesy can only legally be abided if courtesy does not make one violate any of the Rules. The Rules tell me I MUST hold course and speed while sailing in a crossing situation with a ferry (not in a narrow channel) and they tell a ferry that as a motor vessel she must give way to a sailboat. The only situation where this does not apply is in narrow channels or if the sailboat is overtaking the ferry. S.Simon "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Correct. There is the principle of courtesy, which all should follow however. We do and they do. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... The COLREGS don't make any mention of 'common sense'. As far as the COLREGS go, ferries are motor vessels and must adhere to the Rules pertaining to motor vessels. This means they are the give-way in many situations whether you or they care to believe it. Their schedule and the number of people they carry has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact they are bound by the Rules to proceed in a certain manner when interacting with other vessels. They can carry a billion people all needing to get somewhere on time and that does not relieve them of their legal obligation to give way to a sailboat underway under sail. S.Simon "Schoonertrash" wrote in message ... Ferry boats are like busses or trains. They operate on a fixed schedule and many thousands of people depend on them to keep to that schedule. Common sense, basic politeness, if nothing else will tell you to keep out of there way. And it doesn't take more than a few minutes to Steer For The Stern rather than the bow. If nothing else re-read Rule 2. Or better yet consider them Restricted In Ability to Manuever by virtue of their job. It also depends on where the ferry is located and under which laws it's operating. In the Puget Sound and clear into Lake Washington it's International Rules. Yet ferry's make one long horn blast when backing out or departing. Why? It's common sense to warn other water traffic they are about to move. Here's another difference which applies 'on' the ferry. In Washington State they are considered part of the state highway system. All Highway traffic rules apply to the motorist. As for speed I took the hydrofoil to Victoria once and one from England to the continent. Never again. Like roller skating across railroad ties. Thumpety thumpety thumpety. MST |
Ferry Speeds
Not in the US. I know this applies in Syndey harbor, but not
in the SF bay. Ferries have lower status on the open bay. "Peter Wiley" wrote in message . .. God, you're stupid, have a short attention span and can't be bothered to do some basic research before rabbiting on in your ignorance. Not so long ago we discussed this very issue. Local rules can & do override the general COLREG rules. In Sydney Harbour, ferries do *not* have to give way to sailboats. Period. I'd suspect the same situation applies to most ferries running on regular routes. Your "only situation" as below is a figment of your limited imagination. Peter Wiley In article , Simple Simon wrote: Wrong! Courtesy is not even mentioned in the COLREGS. Courtesy can only legally be abided if courtesy does not make one violate any of the Rules. The Rules tell me I MUST hold course and speed while sailing in a crossing situation with a ferry (not in a narrow channel) and they tell a ferry that as a motor vessel she must give way to a sailboat. The only situation where this does not apply is in narrow channels or if the sailboat is overtaking the ferry. S.Simon "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Correct. There is the principle of courtesy, which all should follow however. We do and they do. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... The COLREGS don't make any mention of 'common sense'. As far as the COLREGS go, ferries are motor vessels and must adhere to the Rules pertaining to motor vessels. This means they are the give-way in many situations whether you or they care to believe it. Their schedule and the number of people they carry has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact they are bound by the Rules to proceed in a certain manner when interacting with other vessels. They can carry a billion people all needing to get somewhere on time and that does not relieve them of their legal obligation to give way to a sailboat underway under sail. S.Simon "Schoonertrash" wrote in message ... Ferry boats are like busses or trains. They operate on a fixed schedule and many thousands of people depend on them to keep to that schedule. Common sense, basic politeness, if nothing else will tell you to keep out of there way. And it doesn't take more than a few minutes to Steer For The Stern rather than the bow. If nothing else re-read Rule 2. Or better yet consider them Restricted In Ability to Manuever by virtue of their job. It also depends on where the ferry is located and under which laws it's operating. In the Puget Sound and clear into Lake Washington it's International Rules. Yet ferry's make one long horn blast when backing out or departing. Why? It's common sense to warn other water traffic they are about to move. Here's another difference which applies 'on' the ferry. In Washington State they are considered part of the state highway system. All Highway traffic rules apply to the motorist. As for speed I took the hydrofoil to Victoria once and one from England to the continent. Never again. Like roller skating across railroad ties. Thumpety thumpety thumpety. MST |
Ferry Speeds
ect: Ferry Speeds
From: "Simple Simon" Date: 11/19/2003 18:32 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Because of a little organization called the IRS I will NOT claim I made almost ten grand last year using my licenses. I wonder if you can claim the same or more??? S.Simon ROFLMAO Which week? Shen |
Ferry Speeds
On the ocean. In the bay, shipping traffic, tankers
and the like do have stand on status and must be given ground. I've seen a freighter change course to avoid a sailboat on the ocean... we were the sailboat, but we were getting ready to head up and avoid her. They must have had the rare lookout. :-) "Shen44" wrote in message ... Subject: Ferry Speeds From: "Jonathan Ganz" Date: 11/19/2003 17:17 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: In the SF bay, ferries do not have any restriction on manueverability, except near their landings. They are required to get out of our way in the middle of the bay, and we regularly enforce the rules, which they know quite well and always follow. Of course, we don't deliberately put ourselves in their path, but neither do we shy away from sailing where we want to sail because a ferry might be going in that direction. BG This applies to ship traffic also ..... but, ...... EG Shen |
Ferry Speeds
Subject: Ferry Speeds
From: "Simple Simon" Here is Rule 2 verbatim: Rule 2 Responsibility (a) Nothing in these Rules shall exonerate any vessel, or the owner, master, or crew thereof, from the consequences of any neglect to comply with these Rules or of the neglect of any precaution which may be required by the ordinary practice of seamen, or by the special circumstances of the case. (b) In construing and complying with these Rules due regard shall be had to all dangers of navigation and collision and to any special circumstances, including the limitations of the vessels involved, which may make a departure from these Rules necessary to avoid immediate danger. I've read it dozens of times and have yet to see occur the word, "common sense". S.Simon Thank you, simpleton, you've once again proved my point ...... your basic intelligence level is too low to grasp even the most simple of concepts. I realize that the words "common sense" are not in rule 2, but I also know that the rule is called the "rule of good seamanship" and "general prudential" rule. Now, I know that this concept is above your intelligence level of reasoning, but, good seamanship is all about using common sense ..... rule 2, is all about common sense ..... anyone with a basic low intelligence level, can easily understand, that even though Rule 2 never mentions common sense, it is one of the prime considerations being discussed. Sheesh, what a phony wannabe troll. Shen |
Ferry Speeds
ubject: Ferry Speeds
From: "Simple Simon" Date: 11/19/2003 18:06 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: It's not my fault if the authorities are slow to process the renewal. My license remains valid until revoked. When the license renewal is processed and returned to me the date of issue of the new license will be the date of expiration of the old one. This means My license never expired and I can legally operate under the old one with while the paper work is being processed. S.Simon Wrong again simpleton. The expiration date on your license, is the last day you could use it. The years grace period, only gives you time to renew, without having to retake the license exam. If you are using the license and it has expired, I would not hesitate to turn you in for operating without one ... EG though I cannot for the life of me think of what you might be doing, that would require one. Shen |
Ferry Speeds
Subject: Ferry Speeds
From: "Jonathan Ganz" On the ocean. In the bay, shipping traffic, tankers and the like do have stand on status and must be given ground. Not really. They do have the right to expect you not to impede their passage, but they are not necessarily "stand on", although because they are expecting you not to impede their passage, they will appear to act that way. I've seen a freighter change course to avoid a sailboat on the ocean... we were the sailboat, but we were getting ready to head up and avoid her. They must have had the rare lookout. :-) Generally, the last one to see a target, among the "bridge team", is the lookout .... took awhile to understand the why of this. At sea, never expect a ship to maneuver for you (right or wrong). Two main reasons: 1. In any kind of seaway, you may not be seen (right or wrong) 2. Experience has taught many that if there is a good deal of small boat traffic around, the best bet is to claim "rule of GT" and maintain course and speed. You might **** one or two off, but you'll generally get through without confusing/ upsetting the many (right or wrong) If it's a single boat and they see it, you'll frequently see them maneuver, but generally at the last moment, because, again, experience has shown where small boats are concerned, expect the unexpected. (Hey! Let's take a close look at the big ship!!). (right or wrong). Shen |
Ferry Speeds
"Shen44" wrote in message ... Subject: Ferry Speeds From: "Jonathan Ganz" On the ocean. In the bay, shipping traffic, tankers and the like do have stand on status and must be given ground. Not really. They do have the right to expect you not to impede their passage, but they are not necessarily "stand on", although because they are expecting you not to impede their passage, they will appear to act that way. Not according to every single person I've ever heard speak on the subject, including several Coasties. The tankers have stand on status. They will not and cannot stop or maneuver much in the bay. I don't know about expecting or not, but the CG says they have status. I've seen a freighter change course to avoid a sailboat on the ocean... we were the sailboat, but we were getting ready to head up and avoid her. They must have had the rare lookout. :-) Generally, the last one to see a target, among the "bridge team", is the lookout .... took awhile to understand the why of this. At sea, never expect a ship to maneuver for you (right or wrong). Two main reasons: 1. In any kind of seaway, you may not be seen (right or wrong) 2. Experience has taught many that if there is a good deal of small boat traffic around, the best bet is to claim "rule of GT" and maintain course and speed. You might **** one or two off, but you'll generally get through without confusing/ upsetting the many (right or wrong) If it's a single boat and they see it, you'll frequently see them maneuver, but generally at the last moment, because, again, experience has shown where small boats are concerned, expect the unexpected. (Hey! Let's take a close look at the big ship!!). (right or wrong). Well, we try to get the hell out of Dodge if we have any indication a freighter is headed our way... in the bay or out. :-) Shen |
Ferry Speeds
Subject: Ferry Speeds
From: "Jonathan Ganz" Date: 11/20/2003 09:36 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "Shen44" wrote in message ... Subject: Ferry Speeds From: "Jonathan Ganz" Not according to every single person I've ever heard speak on the subject, including several Coasties. The tankers have stand on status. They will not and cannot stop or maneuver much in the bay. I don't know about expecting or not, but the CG says they have status. You tweaked a memory. In SF Bay, there's at least one area which is an RNA and small boats aren't allowed (around Pinole Shoal) and there may be others, but generally, I believe you'll find that everyone's working under the "shall not impede" rule. (I'd love to see some case history on this). We are talking a legal point here that has room for confusion regarding "stand on" status ..... it's a part of the "Shall Not Impede" rule that many have never liked. I would like to say, you're correct, because the ship shall not be impeded, he has stand on status, but G that status is not absolute. Shen |
Ferry Speeds
Hmmm... interesting point... I'm wondering when would be
a situation when that status isn't absolute... in the bay that is? "Shen44" wrote in message ... You tweaked a memory. In SF Bay, there's at least one area which is an RNA and small boats aren't allowed (around Pinole Shoal) and there may be others, but generally, I believe you'll find that everyone's working under the "shall not impede" rule. (I'd love to see some case history on this). We are talking a legal point here that has room for confusion regarding "stand on" status ..... it's a part of the "Shall Not Impede" rule that many have never liked. I would like to say, you're correct, because the ship shall not be impeded, he has stand on status, but G that status is not absolute. Shen |
Ferry Speeds
Well, (almost) no status is absolute because in (almost) any real life situation there are
complexities not explicitly mentioned in the rules. For example, there is no explicit mention of three vessel situations in the rules. However, the phrase "shall not impede" is a bit more vague than most of the ColRegs. Most casual commentators, writing simplified rules for novices, will say that "shall not impede" means the same as "keep out of the way off" that implies give-way status. However, this is not the intent of the wording. "Shall not impede the safe passage" means that a vessel which might ordinarily have stand-on status, must leave the other vessel a reasonable amount of room to pass. The stand-on/give-way relationship still holds, but now the stand-on vessel may be required to alter course to accommodate the other vessel. The meaning of this, in practice, depends a lot on the actual situation. For instance, Rule 9(b) says that a vessel under 20 meters or a sailboat shall not impede a vessel that can only navigate within a channel - but it doesn't say anything about this vessel - it may be smaller and less restricted than the sailboat. If the vessel is actually more maneuverable than the sailboat, it does not need a "protection" from 9(b). However, if the give-way vessel is an oil tanker, it may be on the only reasonable course, and any alteration would be impeding its safe passage. Thus, the master of the sailboat has to appreciate the handling characteristics of the other vessel. Since its rather unlikely that the novice small boat operator will understand the needs of the large ship, for these boats, interpreting "shall not impede" as meaning "give-way" is appropriate. However, it doesn't mean that a smaller power vessel becomes stand-on WRT a sailboat because its in a fairway. Thus, the status of vessels implied by the various terms of Rules 9 and 10 are not as absolute as the "stand-on/give-way" status of Rule 18. There has been much confusion over the use of "impede;" the IMO tried to clarify this in Rule 8 with some added clauses - their comments on this make it clear that "shall not impede" is not as binding as "shall stay out of the way of," but the words of Rule 8 often sound like gibberish. Fortunately, professional mariners seems to understand it. "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Hmmm... interesting point... I'm wondering when would be a situation when that status isn't absolute... in the bay that is? "Shen44" wrote in message ... You tweaked a memory. In SF Bay, there's at least one area which is an RNA and small boats aren't allowed (around Pinole Shoal) and there may be others, but generally, I believe you'll find that everyone's working under the "shall not impede" rule. (I'd love to see some case history on this). We are talking a legal point here that has room for confusion regarding "stand on" status ..... it's a part of the "Shall Not Impede" rule that many have never liked. I would like to say, you're correct, because the ship shall not be impeded, he has stand on status, but G that status is not absolute. Shen |
Ferry Speeds
Very good dissertation. I'm glad you gave a good
explanation of shall not impede. One thing you did not mention, however, is shall not impede applies in all conditions of visibility. This means there is give-way/stand-on vessel status in restricted visibility. S.Simon "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... Well, (almost) no status is absolute because in (almost) any real life situation there are complexities not explicitly mentioned in the rules. For example, there is no explicit mention of three vessel situations in the rules. However, the phrase "shall not impede" is a bit more vague than most of the ColRegs. Most casual commentators, writing simplified rules for novices, will say that "shall not impede" means the same as "keep out of the way off" that implies give-way status. However, this is not the intent of the wording. "Shall not impede the safe passage" means that a vessel which might ordinarily have stand-on status, must leave the other vessel a reasonable amount of room to pass. The stand-on/give-way relationship still holds, but now the stand-on vessel may be required to alter course to accommodate the other vessel. The meaning of this, in practice, depends a lot on the actual situation. For instance, Rule 9(b) says that a vessel under 20 meters or a sailboat shall not impede a vessel that can only navigate within a channel - but it doesn't say anything about this vessel - it may be smaller and less restricted than the sailboat. If the vessel is actually more maneuverable than the sailboat, it does not need a "protection" from 9(b). However, if the give-way vessel is an oil tanker, it may be on the only reasonable course, and any alteration would be impeding its safe passage. Thus, the master of the sailboat has to appreciate the handling characteristics of the other vessel. Since its rather unlikely that the novice small boat operator will understand the needs of the large ship, for these boats, interpreting "shall not impede" as meaning "give-way" is appropriate. However, it doesn't mean that a smaller power vessel becomes stand-on WRT a sailboat because its in a fairway. Thus, the status of vessels implied by the various terms of Rules 9 and 10 are not as absolute as the "stand-on/give-way" status of Rule 18. There has been much confusion over the use of "impede;" the IMO tried to clarify this in Rule 8 with some added clauses - their comments on this make it clear that "shall not impede" is not as binding as "shall stay out of the way of," but the words of Rule 8 often sound like gibberish. Fortunately, professional mariners seems to understand it. "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Hmmm... interesting point... I'm wondering when would be a situation when that status isn't absolute... in the bay that is? "Shen44" wrote in message ... You tweaked a memory. In SF Bay, there's at least one area which is an RNA and small boats aren't allowed (around Pinole Shoal) and there may be others, but generally, I believe you'll find that everyone's working under the "shall not impede" rule. (I'd love to see some case history on this). We are talking a legal point here that has room for confusion regarding "stand on" status ..... it's a part of the "Shall Not Impede" rule that many have never liked. I would like to say, you're correct, because the ship shall not be impeded, he has stand on status, but G that status is not absolute. Shen |
Ferry Speeds
Negative, former master.
It is true that the "shall not impede" rules are in affect in all conditions of visibility, but as always, you've missed the important point. "Shall no impede" is NOT the same as "give-way." There are similarities, to be sure, and in the extreme case they are effectively the same. But the governing rules use very different language and mean different things. In fact, Rule 8(f)iii stresses that the stand-on/give-way relationship has not been altered - a "not to be impeded" vessel may still be the give-way vessel. Further, its important to note that the "vessel not to be impeded" is not "stand-on" - that is, it is not required to hold course and speed. In fact, it may well be required to alter course. All that "shall not impede" requires is that the vessel is given sufficient room for safe passage. The stand-on/give-way relationship implies that the stand-on vessel should not have to alter course at all. You have raised an interesting issue that the Narrow Channel and TSS Rules are in affect in all conditions of visibility. It means that in heavy fog a sailboat should not cross a channel if it is not able to determine if it is clear. This should be easy in a lightly used channel, where you might only hear one fog signal, but would be impossible in a busy channel without radar. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Very good dissertation. I'm glad you gave a good explanation of shall not impede. One thing you did not mention, however, is shall not impede applies in all conditions of visibility. This means there is give-way/stand-on vessel status in restricted visibility. S.Simon "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... Well, (almost) no status is absolute because in (almost) any real life situation there are complexities not explicitly mentioned in the rules. For example, there is no explicit mention of three vessel situations in the rules. However, the phrase "shall not impede" is a bit more vague than most of the ColRegs. Most casual commentators, writing simplified rules for novices, will say that "shall not impede" means the same as "keep out of the way off" that implies give-way status. However, this is not the intent of the wording. "Shall not impede the safe passage" means that a vessel which might ordinarily have stand-on status, must leave the other vessel a reasonable amount of room to pass. The stand-on/give-way relationship still holds, but now the stand-on vessel may be required to alter course to accommodate the other vessel. The meaning of this, in practice, depends a lot on the actual situation. For instance, Rule 9(b) says that a vessel under 20 meters or a sailboat shall not impede a vessel that can only navigate within a channel - but it doesn't say anything about this vessel - it may be smaller and less restricted than the sailboat. If the vessel is actually more maneuverable than the sailboat, it does not need a "protection" from 9(b). However, if the give-way vessel is an oil tanker, it may be on the only reasonable course, and any alteration would be impeding its safe passage. Thus, the master of the sailboat has to appreciate the handling characteristics of the other vessel. Since its rather unlikely that the novice small boat operator will understand the needs of the large ship, for these boats, interpreting "shall not impede" as meaning "give-way" is appropriate. However, it doesn't mean that a smaller power vessel becomes stand-on WRT a sailboat because its in a fairway. Thus, the status of vessels implied by the various terms of Rules 9 and 10 are not as absolute as the "stand-on/give-way" status of Rule 18. There has been much confusion over the use of "impede;" the IMO tried to clarify this in Rule 8 with some added clauses - their comments on this make it clear that "shall not impede" is not as binding as "shall stay out of the way of," but the words of Rule 8 often sound like gibberish. Fortunately, professional mariners seems to understand it. "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Hmmm... interesting point... I'm wondering when would be a situation when that status isn't absolute... in the bay that is? "Shen44" wrote in message ... You tweaked a memory. In SF Bay, there's at least one area which is an RNA and small boats aren't allowed (around Pinole Shoal) and there may be others, but generally, I believe you'll find that everyone's working under the "shall not impede" rule. (I'd love to see some case history on this). We are talking a legal point here that has room for confusion regarding "stand on" status ..... it's a part of the "Shall Not Impede" rule that many have never liked. I would like to say, you're correct, because the ship shall not be impeded, he has stand on status, but G that status is not absolute. Shen |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:26 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com