Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's all obvious and I don't disagree. What I do disagree
with is the fact that Rick and the others have a narrow view of when and where 'shall not impede applies. They claim it only applies in narrow channels and fairways and traffic separation schemes while I maintain it is a broader concept applying as stated 'by any of these rules' --------------- 8 (f)(i) A vessel which, by any of these rules, is required not to impede the passage or safe passage of . . . S.Simon "otnmbrd" wrote in message ink.net... Neal, I think you are missing the point that the others are discussing. It doesn't matter if the "ship" is in a narrow channel or a TSS, the Rules are still holding them to the stand on/give way status under the Steering and Sailing Rules. However, because the vessel which must stay in the narrow channel or TSS, is working under conditions which potentially limit it's ability to comply with those rules, they have stated that the vessel which is not restricted to those confines, shall not impede, even though it may be the stand on vessel. They have not relieved the ship of it's obligations, they have just put the greater obligation onto the smaller vessel to understand those conditions and give way, no matter what (stand on or give way). otn |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why Ficht Failed No 2 (octane, propa speeds, oil dilution) | General | |||
Read this, Capt. Shen - ferry news | ASA | |||
Staten Island ferry crash | ASA | |||
Major Ferry Accident in New York | General | |||
Block Island ferry: Quonset | General |