Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Ahhhh yes! By contract, the 34XL is now mine. Still, she'll be registered in my father's name! RB |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Funny ......... the only reason someone would put everything they buy in other
people's names is creditors must be after him or he thinks there is a good chance he will be sued one day because his "business" is a scam. Boob**** what's your reason? S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster" Trains are a winter sport |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Funny ......... the only reason someone would put everything they buy in other
people's names is creditors must be after him or he thinks there is a good Could Loco be this ignorant? There are many reasons why we put the boat in her name, none of which had anything to do with credit. RB |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, Suzanne is the sole owner of the boat, so it makes sense that it is in
her name only. Just how ignorant can you be, Loco? No sole ownership of properties acquired during a marriage. Buying a house in my name won't make it so. Same for a car or a boat. Wish it were different. RB |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Funny ......... the only reason someone would put everything they buy in
other people's names is creditors must be after him or he thinks there is a good chance he will be sued one day because his "business" is a scam. Boob**** what's your reason? S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster" Trains are a winter sport No actually it's because smart businessmen realise that things can go wrong over which you have no control and that with liability and litigation the way it is today, it's smart to protect your assets. They do that by incorporating, dimwit. That's right. There is no viable asset protection scheme that involves putting your assets in another individual's name. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And they incorporate for what reason?
Damn, I forgot, you're a Bushie and brain dead! Don't backpedal, Alfie. You backed up Bob's strategy of putting assets in his wife's name as asset protection. That CG ID doesn't list any corporation. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's right. There is no viable asset protection scheme that involves putting
your assets in another individual's name. Insurance issues. RB |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No sole ownership of properties acquired during a marriage. Buying a house
in my name won't make it so. Same for a car or a boat. Wish it were different. Wrong again dimwit. Check with your insurance co. It's well known that married couples who own 2 cars should put them in each other's names instead of co-ownership. If a car that's owned by both is in an accident the other party can sue both and win the house. Can't happen if the car is only in one of the married couples names. S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster" Trains are a winter sport |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wrong again dimwit. Check with your insurance co. It's well known that
married couples who own 2 cars should put them in each other's names instead of co-ownership. Can't keep track can you, Loco? I already said the boat in her name had to do with insurance. RB |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Could Loco be this ignorant? There are many reasons why we put the boat in
her name, none of which had anything to do with credit. I never said anything about that one. I only commented after you posted you'll be puting the "new" boat in daddy's name. S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster" Trains are a winter sport |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General |