| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Thank You Ol Thom
Thanks for doing your part in making the USA the greatest country on earth.
Thank you and all the vets that carried the tourch of freedom. Who else here is a veteran? Joe C.A.P. N.J.R.O.T.C. BMSN USS Samuel Gompers AD-37 USMM Master Its to easy to tell who is not. |
Thank You Ol Thom
I'll drink to that!
Scotty "Joe" wrote in message om... Thanks for doing your part in making the USA the greatest country on earth. Thank you and all the vets that carried the tourch of freedom. Who else here is a veteran? Joe C.A.P. N.J.R.O.T.C. BMSN USS Samuel Gompers AD-37 USMM Master Its to easy to tell who is not. |
Thank You Ol Thom
Joe wrote:
Thanks for doing your part in making the USA the greatest country on earth. Thank you and all the vets that carried the tourch of freedom. Who else here is a veteran? I'll second that, and add a salute. Doug King, ex BT1(SW) USS MacDonough DDG-37 USS Paul FF-1080 |
Thank You Ole Thom
Thanks Joe,
Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of real credit, In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was the Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly war but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! That, I believe was the last war fought that way. You younger Vets have never had that option. Politics have entered our lives and God help me for saying this, but I don't think anyone can know what a final victory is anymore. I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR VETS---- GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" Ole Thom |
Thank You Ole Thom
What war did you fight in? The Civil War? :-)
S.Simon "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Thanks Joe, Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of real credit, In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was the Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly war but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! That, I believe was the last war fought that way. You younger Vets have never had that option. Politics have entered our lives and God help me for saying this, but I don't think anyone can know what a final victory is anymore. I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR VETS---- GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" Ole Thom |
Thank You Ole Thom
"Thom Stewart" wrote... Thanks Joe, Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of real credit, In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was the Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly war but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! That, I believe was the last war fought that way. I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political solution for an economic problem. It's a loose term for any large group of people attempting to impose their collective will on another group by force. An old fashioned word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, economically valuable targets for our military to go after. We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any industrialized country has AFAIK addressed either. 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, so there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on any terms 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic groups who profit by the destruction of competitors assets I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation makes me very sad. I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always chooses to fight in most horrible climates & terrains we can find. Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR VETS---- GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" I'll drink to that, too, Thom! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Thank You Ole Thom
Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it
that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. The US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist countries/regimes -when it suits you. Cheers MC DSK wrote: "Thom Stewart" wrote... Thanks Joe, Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of real credit, In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was the Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly war but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! That, I believe was the last war fought that way. I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political solution for an economic problem. It's a loose term for any large group of people attempting to impose their collective will on another group by force. An old fashioned word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, economically valuable targets for our military to go after. We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any industrialized country has AFAIK addressed either. 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, so there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on any terms 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic groups who profit by the destruction of competitors assets I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation makes me very sad. I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always chooses to fight in most horrible climates & terrains we can find. Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR VETS---- GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" I'll drink to that, too, Thom! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Thank You Ole Thom
The navigator© wrote: Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. Excuse, me, it seems you have a problem with reading comprehension. Is English your native language? I did not "lump them together" other than in the sense that they cannot agree, which you seconded. So how does this 'reveal' anything at all about my 'diplomatic smarts,' aside from which I'm not a diplomat at all. The US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist countries/regimes -when it suits you. Since you have no respect for the US to start with, why bother with trying to impress the likes of you? DSK |
Thank You Ole Thom
Still not raised your debating skill beyond the schoolyard? Or are you
just as stupid as you appear to be? Let me repost your statement: "1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, so there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on any terms " Cheers MC DSK wrote: The navigator© wrote: Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. Excuse, me, it seems you have a problem with reading comprehension. Is English your native language? I did not "lump them together" other than in the sense that they cannot agree, which you seconded. So how does this 'reveal' anything at all about my 'diplomatic smarts,' aside from which I'm not a diplomat at all. The US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist countries/regimes -when it suits you. Since you have no respect for the US to start with, why bother with trying to impress the likes of you? DSK |
Thank You Ole Thom
The navigator© wrote:
Still not raised your debating skill beyond the schoolyard? Or are you just as stupid as you appear to be? Let me repost your statement: "1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, so there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on any terms " And you then said: Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it that they cannot agree on In other words, they cannot agree. As I said. Thank you and good night. Don't forget to take your medicine before beddie-byes. DSK |
Thank You Ole Thom
GOALS GOALS GOALS -not means of achieving them!
God are you stupid. Cheers MC DSK wrote: The navigator© wrote: Still not raised your debating skill beyond the schoolyard? Or are you just as stupid as you appear to be? Let me repost your statement: "1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, so there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on any terms " And you then said: Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it that they cannot agree on In other words, they cannot agree. As I said. Thank you and good night. Don't forget to take your medicine before beddie-byes. DSK |
Thank You Ole Thom
SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking.
Scotty "The_nagitattor" wrote ... Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. The US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist countries/regimes -when it suits you. Cheers MC DSK wrote: "Thom Stewart" wrote... Thanks Joe, Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of real credit, In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was the Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly war but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! That, I believe was the last war fought that way. I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political solution for an economic problem. It's a loose term for any large group of people attempting to impose their collective will on another group by force. An old fashioned word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, economically valuable targets for our military to go after. We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any industrialized country has AFAIK addressed either. 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, so there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on any terms 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic groups who profit by the destruction of competitors assets I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation makes me very sad. I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always chooses to fight in most horrible climates & terrains we can find. Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR VETS---- GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" I'll drink to that, too, Thom! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Thank You Ole Thom
But you are on MY planet.
Cheers MC Scott Vernon wrote: SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. Scotty "The_nagitattor" wrote ... Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. The US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist countries/regimes -when it suits you. Cheers MC DSK wrote: "Thom Stewart" wrote... Thanks Joe, Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of real credit, In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was the Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly war but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! That, I believe was the last war fought that way. I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political solution for an economic problem. It's a loose term for any large group of people attempting to impose their collective will on another group by force. An old fashioned word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, economically valuable targets for our military to go after. We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any industrialized country has AFAIK addressed either. 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, so there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on any terms 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic groups who profit by the destruction of competitors assets I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation makes me very sad. I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always chooses to fight in most horrible climates & terrains we can find. Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR VETS---- GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" I'll drink to that, too, Thom! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Thank You Ole Thom
WRONG, the world belongs to US.
"The_navigator©" wrote in message ... But you are on MY planet. Cheers MC Scott Vernon wrote: SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. Scotty "The_nagitattor" wrote ... Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. The US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist countries/regimes -when it suits you. Cheers MC DSK wrote: "Thom Stewart" wrote... Thanks Joe, Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of real credit, In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was the Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly war but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! That, I believe was the last war fought that way. I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political solution for an economic problem. It's a loose term for any large group of people attempting to impose their collective will on another group by force. An old fashioned word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, economically valuable targets for our military to go after. We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any industrialized country has AFAIK addressed either. 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, so there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on any terms 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic groups who profit by the destruction of competitors assets I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation makes me very sad. I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always chooses to fight in most horrible climates & terrains we can find. Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR VETS---- GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" I'll drink to that, too, Thom! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Thank You Ole Thom
Not my part... and my part is bigger than your part!
CM "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... | WRONG, the world belongs to US. | | | "The_navigator©" wrote in message | ... | But you are on MY planet. | | Cheers MC | | Scott Vernon wrote: | | SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. | | Scotty | | | "The_nagitattor" wrote ... | | Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it | that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans | as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. | That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. The | US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as | you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist | countries/regimes -when it suits you. | | Cheers MC | | DSK wrote: | | | "Thom Stewart" wrote... | | | Thanks Joe, | | Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of | | real | | credit, | | In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was | the | Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly | war | but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! | | That, I believe was the last war fought that way. | | | I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political | | solution for an economic problem. It's a loose | | term for any large group of people attempting to impose their | collective | | will on another group by force. An old fashioned | | word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's | | hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. | | The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the | | Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over | | ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they | | have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate | | that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, | | economically valuable targets for our military to go | | after. | | We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any | industrialized | | country has AFAIK addressed either. | | 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, | so | | there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on | | any terms | | 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic | | groups who profit by the destruction of | | competitors assets | | I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation | | makes me very sad. | | | | I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. | | | In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for | | today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with | | their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living | | conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to | | me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always | | chooses to fight in most horrible climates & | | terrains we can find. | | | | | Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR | VETS---- | | GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" | | | I'll drink to that, too, Thom! | | Fresh Breezes- Doug King | | | | | |
Thank You Ole Thom
We don't want THAT part of the world.
SV "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... Not my part... and my part is bigger than your part! CM "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... | WRONG, the world belongs to US. | | | "The_navigator©" wrote in message | ... | But you are on MY planet. | | Cheers MC | | Scott Vernon wrote: | | SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. | | Scotty | | | "The_nagitattor" wrote ... | | Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it | that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans | as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. | That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. The | US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as | you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist | countries/regimes -when it suits you. | | Cheers MC | | DSK wrote: | | | "Thom Stewart" wrote... | | | Thanks Joe, | | Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of | | real | | credit, | | In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was | the | Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly | war | but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! | | That, I believe was the last war fought that way. | | | I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political | | solution for an economic problem. It's a loose | | term for any large group of people attempting to impose their | collective | | will on another group by force. An old fashioned | | word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's | | hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. | | The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the | | Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over | | ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they | | have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate | | that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, | | economically valuable targets for our military to go | | after. | | We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any | industrialized | | country has AFAIK addressed either. | | 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, | so | | there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on | | any terms | | 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic | | groups who profit by the destruction of | | competitors assets | | I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation | | makes me very sad. | | | | I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. | | | In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for | | today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with | | their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living | | conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to | | me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always | | chooses to fight in most horrible climates & | | terrains we can find. | | | | | Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR | VETS---- | | GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" | | | I'll drink to that, too, Thom! | | Fresh Breezes- Doug King | | | | | |
Thank You Ole Thom
Well goody for you cause you Can't Have It! So There!
CM "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... | We don't want THAT part of the world. | | SV | | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message | ... | Not my part... and my part is bigger than your part! | | CM | | "Scott Vernon" wrote in message | ... | | WRONG, the world belongs to US. | | | | | | "The_navigator©" wrote in message | | ... | | But you are on MY planet. | | | | Cheers MC | | | | Scott Vernon wrote: | | | | SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. | | | | Scotty | | | | | | "The_nagitattor" wrote ... | | | | Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving | it | | that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all | Americans | | as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation | table. | | That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. | The | | US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes | as | | you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist | | countries/regimes -when it suits you. | | | | Cheers MC | | | | DSK wrote: | | | | | | "Thom Stewart" wrote... | | | | | | Thanks Joe, | | | | Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share | of | | | | real | | | | credit, | | | | In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It | was | | the | | Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, | costly | | war | | but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! | | | | That, I believe was the last war fought that way. | | | | | | I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a | political | | | | solution for an economic problem. It's a loose | | | | term for any large group of people attempting to impose their | | collective | | | | will on another group by force. An old fashioned | | | | word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried | it's | | | | hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. | | | | The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the | | | | Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over | | | | ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way | they | | | | have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate | | | | that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, | | | | economically valuable targets for our military to go | | | | after. | | | | We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any | | industrialized | | | | country has AFAIK addressed either. | | | | 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own | goals, | | so | | | | there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on | | | | any terms | | | | 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes | economic | | | | groups who profit by the destruction of | | | | competitors assets | | | | I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation | | | | makes me very sad. | | | | | | | | I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we | did. | | | | | | In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for | | | | today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with | | | | their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living | | | | conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to | | | | me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US | always | | | | chooses to fight in most horrible climates & | | | | terrains we can find. | | | | | | | | | | Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR | | VETS---- | | | | GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" | | | | | | I'll drink to that, too, Thom! | | | | Fresh Breezes- Doug King | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thank You Ole Thom
"Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... WRONG, the world belongs to the US. No, it doesn't! Regards Touche. -- |
Thank You Ol Thom
|
Thank You Ole Thom
No wonder you are having trouble! You don't even know who will inherit
the earth! Cheers MC Scott Vernon wrote: WRONG, the world belongs to US. "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... But you are on MY planet. Cheers MC Scott Vernon wrote: SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. Scotty "The_nagitattor" wrote ... Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. The US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist countries/regimes -when it suits you. Cheers MC DSK wrote: "Thom Stewart" wrote... Thanks Joe, Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of real credit, In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was the Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly war but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! That, I believe was the last war fought that way. I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political solution for an economic problem. It's a loose term for any large group of people attempting to impose their collective will on another group by force. An old fashioned word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, economically valuable targets for our military to go after. We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any industrialized country has AFAIK addressed either. 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, so there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on any terms 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic groups who profit by the destruction of competitors assets I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation makes me very sad. I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always chooses to fight in most horrible climates & terrains we can find. Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR VETS---- GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" I'll drink to that, too, Thom! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Thank You Ole Thom
Ahem is this now a ****ing contest?
Cheers MC Capt. Mooron wrote: Not my part... and my part is bigger than your part! CM "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... | WRONG, the world belongs to US. | | | "The_navigator©" wrote in message | ... | But you are on MY planet. | | Cheers MC | | Scott Vernon wrote: | | SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. | | Scotty | | | "The_nagitattor" wrote ... | | Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it | that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans | as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. | That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. The | US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as | you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist | countries/regimes -when it suits you. | | Cheers MC | | DSK wrote: | | | "Thom Stewart" wrote... | | | Thanks Joe, | | Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of | | real | | credit, | | In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was | the | Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly | war | but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! | | That, I believe was the last war fought that way. | | | I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political | | solution for an economic problem. It's a loose | | term for any large group of people attempting to impose their | collective | | will on another group by force. An old fashioned | | word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's | | hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. | | The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the | | Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over | | ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they | | have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate | | that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, | | economically valuable targets for our military to go | | after. | | We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any | industrialized | | country has AFAIK addressed either. | | 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, | so | | there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on | | any terms | | 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic | | groups who profit by the destruction of | | competitors assets | | I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation | | makes me very sad. | | | | I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. | | | In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for | | today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with | | their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living | | conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to | | me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always | | chooses to fight in most horrible climates & | | terrains we can find. | | | | | Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR | VETS---- | | GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" | | | I'll drink to that, too, Thom! | | Fresh Breezes- Doug King | | | | | |
Thank You Ol Thom
20 Years and One Day . .US Army. But more importantly. Did Thom tell you
he worked on Navy ships in WWII? Now THAT is real service! MST |
Thank You Ole Thom
Actually mine is bigger. That's why I have to use chafing gear. The cynic
in me arises once again. A small tribute to someone like Thom devolves ad nauseum into sandbox rhetoric. Now boys and boys...the ladies being to intelligent to take part in this . . . .a small lesson in real politik. Carlos Marighella, a Brazilian, writes a small tome entitled "Mini Manual For The Urban Guerrilla". In the 60's a group of would be revolutionaries, Tupamaros, put it's precepts to use in Uruguay. Uruguay, up til then known as the 'Switzerland of the Americas" went from one of the four most democratic countries of the Americas (the others being, at the time US, Canada, and Costa Rica) on a down hill slide and almost but not quite into a permanent military dictatorship. The Tupamaros were small, under equipped and underfunded. They had almost zero support. The strategy was to turn the freedoms of a democratic (Small "D") nation against itself in a judo like manner. The tactic was irrational acts of violence, no two alike. The victims were . . .anyone and no one of any great importance. All this was lumped under the term "Cycle of Repression". Here's how it worked. An act of senseless violence was carried out. Say a bomb on a bus. Lots of bodies. Some propaganda then released claiming the police were impotent to stop further acts. Next maybe poison in a town's water supply. More propaganda. More acts followed each unrelated as to place, time, victims, or methodology. The population demands the police and other authorities protect them. Police say 'fine but we're going to have to suspend a few civil liberties.' Maybe roadside searches of vehicles, maybe curfews. A few more acts of violence occur. Population gets very vocal and demanding. Police say 'fine but we're going to have to temporarily suspend a few more civil liberties. And so on . .. after a while along with some other deeds designed to show the Tupamaros supported the population, the police and the military drifted into the role of 'oppressors'. People would forget who was the real enemy. The democratic government was now seen as totalitarian. Cycle after cycle of violence bred more 'repression' until the population supported the revolutionaries. Least ways this was the plan according to Senor Marighella. . . . . it almost worked in Uruguay. Now 9/11 and the Department of Homeland Security . . . . . . .. Not necessarily a bad thing . . . .as long as the cycles don't re-occur. As for me . .. . I'd stay away from Friday night High School basketball games in Kansas. "The purpose of terrorism is to terrorize." It's a new world out there folks, there are no front lines. And you wonder why I don't care about eight or ten nukes? Welcome to my style of military service. Cheers . . .and don't sweat it . . .just go sailing! MST |
Thank You Ole Thom
Your puny little country could easily fit into just one of our provinces
with plenty of room for a big herd of Bison and a Theme Park. Sod off you Runt! CM "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... | Ahem is this now a ****ing contest? | | Cheers MC | | Capt. Mooron wrote: | | Not my part... and my part is bigger than your part! | | CM | | "Scott Vernon" wrote in message | ... | | WRONG, the world belongs to US. | | | | | | "The_navigator©" wrote in message | | ... | | But you are on MY planet. | | | | Cheers MC | | | | Scott Vernon wrote: | | | | SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. | | | | Scotty | | | | | | "The_nagitattor" wrote ... | | | | Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it | | that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans | | as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation | table. | | That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. | The | | US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as | | you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist | | countries/regimes -when it suits you. | | | | Cheers MC | | | | DSK wrote: | | | | | | "Thom Stewart" wrote... | | | | | | Thanks Joe, | | | | Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of | | | | real | | | | credit, | | | | In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was | | the | | Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly | | war | | but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! | | | | That, I believe was the last war fought that way. | | | | | | I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a | political | | | | solution for an economic problem. It's a loose | | | | term for any large group of people attempting to impose their | | collective | | | | will on another group by force. An old fashioned | | | | word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried | it's | | | | hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. | | | | The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the | | | | Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over | | | | ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way | they | | | | have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate | | | | that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, | | | | economically valuable targets for our military to go | | | | after. | | | | We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any | | industrialized | | | | country has AFAIK addressed either. | | | | 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, | | so | | | | there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on | | | | any terms | | | | 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes | economic | | | | groups who profit by the destruction of | | | | competitors assets | | | | I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation | | | | makes me very sad. | | | | | | | | I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we | did. | | | | | | In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for | | | | today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with | | | | their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living | | | | conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to | | | | me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always | | | | chooses to fight in most horrible climates & | | | | terrains we can find. | | | | | | | | | | Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR | | VETS---- | | | | GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" | | | | | | I'll drink to that, too, Thom! | | | | Fresh Breezes- Doug King | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thank You Ole Thom
The_navigator© wrote in message ...
Some have very clear goals. Yeah, To pick up a six pack of virgins just for being vaporized. What a goal, what rational thinking, pure genious huh? It is usually their means of achieving it that they cannot agree on. TNT or C4 or Deisel & fertilizer decisions, decisions. While many would like to kill all Americans as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. We dont scare easy, We leave that to you and yours. No one is going to sucker punch the USA and get away with it. That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. The US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist countries/regimes -when it suits you. We do not support terriorist, we support freedom fighters that helped take the evil commies and the likes. People change. Priorties change, if your such a smart diplomat perhaps you can understand that concept. Joe MSV RedCloud Cheers MC DSK wrote: "Thom Stewart" wrote... Thanks Joe, Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of real credit, In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was the Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly war but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! That, I believe was the last war fought that way. I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political solution for an economic problem. It's a loose term for any large group of people attempting to impose their collective will on another group by force. An old fashioned word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, economically valuable targets for our military to go after. We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any industrialized country has AFAIK addressed either. 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, so there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on any terms 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic groups who profit by the destruction of competitors assets I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation makes me very sad. I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always chooses to fight in most horrible climates & terrains we can find. Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR VETS---- GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" I'll drink to that, too, Thom! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Thank You Ole Thom
I agree, we have far less permafrost and less ignorance.
Cheers MC Capt. Mooron wrote: Your puny little country could easily fit into just one of our provinces with plenty of room for a big herd of Bison and a Theme Park. Sod off you Runt! CM "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... | Ahem is this now a ****ing contest? | | Cheers MC | | Capt. Mooron wrote: | | Not my part... and my part is bigger than your part! | | CM | | "Scott Vernon" wrote in message | ... | | WRONG, the world belongs to US. | | | | | | "The_navigator©" wrote in message | | ... | | But you are on MY planet. | | | | Cheers MC | | | | Scott Vernon wrote: | | | | SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. | | | | Scotty | | | | | | "The_nagitattor" wrote ... | | | | Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it | | that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans | | as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation | table. | | That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. | The | | US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as | | you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist | | countries/regimes -when it suits you. | | | | Cheers MC | | | | DSK wrote: | | | | | | "Thom Stewart" wrote... | | | | | | Thanks Joe, | | | | Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of | | | | real | | | | credit, | | | | In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was | | the | | Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly | | war | | but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! | | | | That, I believe was the last war fought that way. | | | | | | I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a | political | | | | solution for an economic problem. It's a loose | | | | term for any large group of people attempting to impose their | | collective | | | | will on another group by force. An old fashioned | | | | word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried | it's | | | | hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. | | | | The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the | | | | Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over | | | | ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way | they | | | | have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate | | | | that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, | | | | economically valuable targets for our military to go | | | | after. | | | | We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any | | industrialized | | | | country has AFAIK addressed either. | | | | 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, | | so | | | | there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on | | | | any terms | | | | 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes | economic | | | | groups who profit by the destruction of | | | | competitors assets | | | | I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation | | | | makes me very sad. | | | | | | | | I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we | did. | | | | | | In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for | | | | today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with | | | | their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living | | | | conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to | | | | me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always | | | | chooses to fight in most horrible climates & | | | | terrains we can find. | | | | | | | | | | Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR | | VETS---- | | | | GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" | | | | | | I'll drink to that, too, Thom! | | | | Fresh Breezes- Doug King | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thank You Ole Thom
Oh dear do you really believe you just support freedom fighters? Let me
ask you a simple question. Which regimes currently supported by the US believe in execution without trial, torture, rape, separation of families, midnight 'knocks'. And yet you call the commies "evil"? Take off your blinkers man. Cheers MC Joe wrote: We do not support terriorist, we support freedom fighters that helped take the evil commies and the likes. People change. Priorties change, if your such a smart diplomat perhaps you can understand that concept. |
Thank You Ole Thom
While I agree on the permafrost.... I doubt you can say that regarding your
proximity to Australia. I mean we live next to the USA... we get acid rain and ignorance up here with each new breeze from the South. CM "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... | I agree, we have far less permafrost and less ignorance. | | Cheers MC | | Capt. Mooron wrote: | | Your puny little country could easily fit into just one of our provinces | with plenty of room for a big herd of Bison and a Theme Park. | | Sod off you Runt! | | CM | | "The_navigator©" wrote in message | ... | | Ahem is this now a ****ing contest? | | | | Cheers MC | | | | Capt. Mooron wrote: | | | | Not my part... and my part is bigger than your part! | | | | CM | | | | "Scott Vernon" wrote in message | | ... | | | WRONG, the world belongs to US. | | | | | | | | | "The_navigator©" wrote in message | | | ... | | | But you are on MY planet. | | | | | | Cheers MC | | | | | | Scott Vernon wrote: | | | | | | SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. | | | | | | Scotty | | | | | | | | | "The_nagitattor" wrote ... | | | | | | Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving | it | | | that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all | Americans | | | as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation | | table. | | | That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic | smarts. | | The | | | US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their | eyes as | | | you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist | | | countries/regimes -when it suits you. | | | | | | Cheers MC | | | | | | DSK wrote: | | | | | | | | | "Thom Stewart" wrote... | | | | | | | | | Thanks Joe, | | | | | | Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your | share of | | | | | | real | | | | | | credit, | | | | | | In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It | was | | | the | | | Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, | costly | | | war | | | but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! | | | | | | That, I believe was the last war fought that way. | | | | | | | | | I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a | | political | | | | | | solution for an economic problem. It's a loose | | | | | | term for any large group of people attempting to impose their | | | collective | | | | | | will on another group by force. An old fashioned | | | | | | word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried | | it's | | | | | | hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. | | | | | | The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of | the | | | | | | Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over | | | | | | ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only | way | | they | | | | | | have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate | | | | | | that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, | obvious, | | | | | | economically valuable targets for our military to go | | | | | | after. | | | | | | We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any | | | industrialized | | | | | | country has AFAIK addressed either. | | | | | | 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own | goals, | | | so | | | | | | there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on | | | | | | any terms | | | | | | 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes | | economic | | | | | | groups who profit by the destruction of | | | | | | competitors assets | | | | | | I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole | situation | | | | | | makes me very sad. | | | | | | | | | | | | I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we | | did. | | | | | | | | | In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy | for | | | | | | today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with | | | | | | their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living | | | | | | conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to | | | | | | me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US | always | | | | | | chooses to fight in most horrible climates & | | | | | | terrains we can find. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR | | | VETS---- | | | | | | GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" | | | | | | | | | I'll drink to that, too, Thom! | | | | | | Fresh Breezes- Doug King | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thank You Ole Thom
Which regimes---------?
Do you mean the UK and their treatment of the Irish?? OT |
Thank You Ole Thom
As much as that? You been allowing the gene pool to dilute?
Cheers MC Capetanios Oz wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:42:51 +1300, The_navigator© wrote: Well of course we ship stupidy out. That's smart doncha think? Cheers MC Yeah, but suburbs like Rockdale now have an average IQ of 50! Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
Thank You Ole Thom
Let's see the main cause of acid rain in the Eastern US and Canada is
burning bituminous coal by citizens of the United States AND Canada rather than clean burning anthracite coal. Don't know about Canada but here's how it worked in the US. The bituminous coal mine owners not only contributed greatly to the campaign of one Prince Albert "Let Them Eat Gridlock" Gore. Who then invested heavily in the same dirty coal producing companies with the proceeds of his sale of tobacco producing interests (sold to relatives as it happens). Concurrently one of the largest deposites of 'clean' anthracite' coal was locked up from use out in Utah and surrounding areas by the preceding administration. Hmmmmmmmmm..... "Follow The Money". Instead of whining "What about the Republicans" who no doubt do much the same thing . . . .clean the pox off your own house. Now go running to Daddy Carville and plead "James, James . . .what do I regugitate now????" Wheah mah GUmbO? Ok . . .drag out the next cliche . . .. |
Thank You Ole Thom
Especially at the rate you guys produce it.....
CM "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... | Well of course we ship stupidy out. That's smart doncha think? | | Cheers MC | | Capetanios Oz wrote: | | On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 19:30:44 -0400, "Capt. Mooron" | wrote: | | | While I agree on the permafrost.... I doubt you can say that regarding your | proximity to Australia. I mean we live next to the USA... we get acid rain | and ignorance up here with each new breeze from the South. | | CM | | Our national IQ drops with every plane landing from New Zealand. | | | Oz1...of the 3 twins. | | I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. | | | |
Thank You Ole Thom
Canaduh?
Cheers MC Capt. Mooron wrote: Especially at the rate you guys produce it..... CM "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... | Well of course we ship stupidy out. That's smart doncha think? | | Cheers MC | | Capetanios Oz wrote: | | On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 19:30:44 -0400, "Capt. Mooron" | wrote: | | | While I agree on the permafrost.... I doubt you can say that regarding your | proximity to Australia. I mean we live next to the USA... we get acid rain | and ignorance up here with each new breeze from the South. | | CM | | Our national IQ drops with every plane landing from New Zealand. | | | Oz1...of the 3 twins. | | I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. | | | |
Thank You Ole Thom
But, this cannot be correct. Bobsprit maintained a couple
months ago that automobiles were the main cause of acid rain. And, Bobsprit is ALWAYS right, isn't he? S.Simon "Schoonertrash" wrote in message ... Let's see the main cause of acid rain in the Eastern US and Canada is burning bituminous coal by citizens of the United States AND Canada rather than clean burning anthracite coal. Don't know about Canada but here's how it worked in the US. The bituminous coal mine owners not only contributed greatly to the campaign of one Prince Albert "Let Them Eat Gridlock" Gore. Who then invested heavily in the same dirty coal producing companies with the proceeds of his sale of tobacco producing interests (sold to relatives as it happens). Concurrently one of the largest deposites of 'clean' anthracite' coal was locked up from use out in Utah and surrounding areas by the preceding administration. Hmmmmmmmmm..... "Follow The Money". Instead of whining "What about the Republicans" who no doubt do much the same thing . . . .clean the pox off your own house. Now go running to Daddy Carville and plead "James, James . . .what do I regugitate now????" Wheah mah GUmbO? Ok . . .drag out the next cliche . . .. |
Thank You Ole Thom
Capetanios Oz wrote in message | Nah, but when the Maori move in, everyone else leaves :-) Those guys are pure warrior. Like the Samoans! Not good to get on the wrong side of one. I respect people like that. Kefe! Fia Poko Onga Kia! Oufa! CM |
Thank You Ole Thom
Not to worry CM,
You get even with raw sewage each time you flush OT |
Thank You Ole Thom
Capetanios Oz wrote in message | Kefe! Fia Poko Onga Kia! Oufa! | Wanna translate that? Sure ... Samoan! Kefe = ****er, ****wad, dipstick Fia Poko onga Kia = eat ****, crap for brains Oufa = Asshole Now try this in Samoan.... Uma Lava Pili Kaki or Uma Lava Pea Soupo Can't fiqure it out???? Kalo Fia... Bwahahahahahahahahaaaaa Village Umunga... Illi Illi American Samoa! Respect Sa! I stand for Illi Llli! I am a Warrior! Understand the way of the Warrior! CM |
Thank You Ole Thom
Oh brother! You and Doug have a lot in common now!
Cheers MC Capt. Mooron wrote: Capetanios Oz wrote in message | Kefe! Fia Poko Onga Kia! Oufa! | Wanna translate that? Sure ... Samoan! Kefe = ****er, ****wad, dipstick Fia Poko onga Kia = eat ****, crap for brains Oufa = Asshole Now try this in Samoan.... Uma Lava Pili Kaki or Uma Lava Pea Soupo Can't fiqure it out???? Kalo Fia... Bwahahahahahahahahaaaaa Village Umunga... Illi Illi American Samoa! Respect Sa! I stand for Illi Llli! I am a Warrior! Understand the way of the Warrior! CM |
Thank You Ole Thom
Do you mean Uma lau'ava pili keke?
Cheers MC Capt. Mooron wrote: Oufa = Asshole Now try this in Samoan.... Uma Lava Pili Kaki |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:01 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com