Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Repeatability is always an issue when measuring things,
The navigatorİ wrote: yes that's why. In other words, no particaluar reason. You just feel like picking nits and that's the only one you can think of. Really? Is it you that's been following me around all my life? Maybe you can really tell me how many big boats I've sailed, I never did keep a written tally myself. Of course not. Then why this fixation you seem to have about my sailing experience and knowledge? Now you want to tell me it's easy to measure a 5 thou deflection over a 40' boat? Sure is. All you need is a yardstick slightly longer than the boat. Yardstick. Riiiiight. And a dial indicater, which I mentioned earlier. Some duct tape would be nice, although that might bring up hysteresis issues (what with 'repeatability' being one of your personal bugaboos and all). Even if the boat builder had access to interferometric equipment (which I'm sure they did not use Now you're claiming you were there? How do you know what they used? Want to put money on it? Let's email them. Alas, they are out of business. In any event, if you were there, then you can tell us the methodology (and why IYHO it's all wrong). If you weren't then you know less about it than me yet want to dispute the issue. Does that sound intelligent? Not really, if you know how. The usual pompous DSK response that hints at knowlege where there is none. I know how, you don't. You claim it's difficult and/or impossible, based on... umm, your vast knowledge? This gets funnier and funnier. Now, lets go back to your original statement which I said was BS. Let me remind lest you think you've moved goal posts and escaped. You said: "At one point FROM the late 1970s THROUGH MAYBE the late 1980s it was fairly common to have a GEODESIC GRID of aluminium struts inside, COMPLETELY OBSTRUCTING THE CABIN." The caps are to highlight the BS. Completely obstructing the cabin? Bwhahhahaha. BULL**** EXPOSED. I'm glad you stay up late at night worrying about this sort of nit picking. I'm sure it keeps you out of worse trouble. Meanwhile, what I said about the boats is true. None of it is BS, the 'trusses' (happy again?) were a total PITA. The boats were bruisers above decks and below. Do you still think it's all BS? Will you never learn? But I think you've confirmed I seem to know more about boat design and construction than you. Yes, that's why you know so much about class rating rules, structural rigidity & characteristics contributing to it, as well as the history of specific types of structures in boats. Thank you so much for making this all clear, Navvieİ Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cathodic Protection for Aluminum Hull - Need Help | General | |||
Anyone strip plank an old carvel hull? | Boat Building | |||
Steel hull - electrical ground | ASA | |||
allied seawind 2 hull speed | General | |||
car top hull issues | Touring |