Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That'll be a side effect of your oogle neuron engaging and sucking the
blood from your other one. Cheers MC Horvath wrote: Do you have those X-ray specs, too? I've got some, and I've tried wearing them at Hooters, but everything is just blurry, and I get a headache. I don't think they really work. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, the Brits didn't invent the cavity magnetron, there were patents on it years before. They
did build one 100 times more powerful than others, which made them usable in a lot of applications. BTW, what kind of x-ray optics do you work on? -- -jeff "Parallax" wrote in message om... The_navigator© wrote in message ... How about this; Boston 1873: A man about forty-six years of age, giving the name of Joshua Coppersmith, has been arrested in New York for attempting to extort funds from ignorant and superstitious people by exhibiting a device which he says will convey the human voice over metallic wires, so that it will be heard by the listener at the other end. He calls the instrument a "telephone", which is obviously intended to imitate the word "telegraph", and win the confidence of those who know of the success of the latter instrument without understanding the principles on which it is based. Well-informed people know that it is impossible to transmit the human voice over wires as may be done with dots and dashes and signals of the Morse Code, and that were it possible to do so, the thing would be of no practical value. The authorities who apprehended this criminal are to be congratulated, and it is to be hoped that it may serve as an example to other conscienceless schemers who enrich themselves at the expense of their fellow creatures. Cheers MC Bobsprit wrote: Congrats, MC!!! You just won the Nobel prize for DULLEST POST EVER ON THE INTERNET. RB As far as I know, the brits did invent the cavity magnetron. Many ppl think that the atom bomb was the most significant hi-tech invention during ww2 but it was really the cavity magnetron which really made radar (and micro-wave ovens) practical. HOWEVER, I will sorta put up two quotes from the eminent brit physicist Lord Kelvin of the 1890's. "These so-called X-rays will be shown to be a fraud" this is my fav since I make x-ray optics. Kelvin also reccomended that young men not enter physics as "all important physics has been done except for a few minor problems in electromagnetic theory" (or something like that). It was those few problems in E&M theory that led to relativity theory (Equations for E&M waves were not invariant under Galilean transformation. Einstein used the Lorentz transform that had been suggested to explain the Michelson Morley experiment to make them invariant). In both cases, the Brit (Kelvin) was trumped by Germans. Kelvin was still one of the greats, in spite of being wrong. Now, how does this apply to sailing? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jeff Morris" wrote in message news:LG6dnaYU-5nxTBaiU-
BTW, what kind of x-ray optics do you work on? I found your web site - neat stuff! I used to work on the Einstein Observatory. Did you ever get involved in that end of things? -jeff |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd say that supports exactly what I've been saying. Given the timing, it was certainly a
huge improvement, but it was one of many necessary to create a workable system. Your link makes it sound like they invented the cavity magnetron, which is certainly not true. And don't forget, at this point in time, the US wasn't even in the war. We were spending billions of dollars developing Radar to save Britain. "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... http://www.marconicalling.com/museum...-i=64-s=6.html "In Britain the Royal Navy had for some time been aware of the importance of ultra-short wave radio for inter-ship communication and early in the Second World War had contracted with Birmingham University to conduct research into transmitting and receiving valves functioning at 10 centimetres. Research conducted by two young scientists assigned to the project, John Randall and Harry Boot, resulted in the creation of the cavity magnetron, which was small enough to be held in one hand, yet could produce 400 watts of power at the required 10 centimetre wavelength, over 100 times more than the most powerful valve then in existence, the klystron. In August 1940, at the height of the Battle of Britain, the cavity magnetron was taken to the USA by a small party of scientists and service officers, led by Tizard. The Americans were so impressed that production of the British cavity magnetron began within weeks." I'd say the US knows a gift when they see it? Cheers MC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bwhahahahha. Who built the first radar array? Did the US even have an
array? Cheers MC Jeff Morris wrote: We were spending billions of dollars developing Radar to save Britain. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In 1940 the American technology was the equal of the British for the longer 1 meter
wavelength. But they were not deployed in the same numbers as the British. I'm not saying the British were not major players in this field. But you implied that Radar would not have existed without the British - this is clearly a myth! "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... Bwhahahahha. Who built the first radar array? Did the US even have an array? Cheers MC Jeff Morris wrote: We were spending billions of dollars developing Radar to save Britain. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
1940? I don't think so, the US didn't have a working cavity magnetron
until it was taken there! Cheers MC Jeff Morris wrote: In 1940 the American technology was the equal of the British for the longer 1 meter wavelength. But they were not deployed in the same numbers as the British. I'm not saying the British were not major players in this field. But you implied that Radar would not have existed without the British - this is clearly a myth! "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... Bwhahahahha. Who built the first radar array? Did the US even have an array? Cheers MC Jeff Morris wrote: We were spending billions of dollars developing Radar to save Britain. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry to disillusion you ..
http://www.radarworld.org/america.html -- -jeff "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... 1940? I don't think so, the US didn't have a working cavity magnetron until it was taken there! Cheers MC Jeff Morris wrote: In 1940 the American technology was the equal of the British for the longer 1 meter wavelength. But they were not deployed in the same numbers as the British. I'm not saying the British were not major players in this field. But you implied that Radar would not have existed without the British - this is clearly a myth! "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... Bwhahahahha. Who built the first radar array? Did the US even have an array? Cheers MC Jeff Morris wrote: We were spending billions of dollars developing Radar to save Britain. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
They did have the Ubitron.
A far superior device! "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... 1940? I don't think so, the US didn't have a working cavity magnetron until it was taken there! Cheers MC Jeff Morris wrote: In 1940 the American technology was the equal of the British for the longer 1 meter wavelength. But they were not deployed in the same numbers as the British. I'm not saying the British were not major players in this field. But you implied that Radar would not have existed without the British - this is clearly a myth! "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... Bwhahahahha. Who built the first radar array? Did the US even have an array? Cheers MC Jeff Morris wrote: We were spending billions of dollars developing Radar to save Britain. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The first reporter observation of radar effects (radio ranging) occured in
the 1890's in Colorado Springs, Colorado. With the same principles, the Schumann resonances of the earth were first discovered and measured. "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... Bwhahahahha. Who built the first radar array? Did the US even have an array? Cheers MC Jeff Morris wrote: We were spending billions of dollars developing Radar to save Britain. |