Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There comes a time in most animals lives, when the quality of life is gone,
when only suffering and pain remain. Most animals reaching that point probably wish to die. I think I would. Those who care the most have an obligation to ease that suffering. The hard part is knowing when "to be" should give way to "not to be." "The Carrolls" wrote in message ... You show all this compassion for a dear departed pet, but cannot show compassion at the difficult decision made? You elevate an animal above a person in your actions. It is not a lack of morals or concience, but the conviction to those morals that allows a person to end the suffering of a dear friend, as difficult as it can be. You on the otherhand use the opportunity to ridicule and be hurtful rather than show empathy and compassion, or even disinterest.. But that is in keeping with your character. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Negative! What I cannot abide, however, is people who write things that indicate they consider their pets as just another throwaway toy. There is all too much of this crap going on these days. What's worse these people expect support and sympathy for their moral decriptitude. People move into an apartment or house where pets are not allowed in the lease so they dump their pets out of the car along the road somewhere. Or, people meet another person who is alergic to their pets so they get rid of the pet at the pound. The pet gets sick and it will be expensive to treat so they have the vet kill it and on and on. People have many excuses but what it all boils down to is FAILURE to accept obligations because it is inconvenient to do so. This indicates a total lack of conscience, morals and respect for life in general. This is true psychotic behavior but so many people exhibit it that it has blurred the norm. But, still, people will continue to attempt to justify it by claiming they killed their pet for whatever reason when the ONLY valid reason to ever kill a pet is if it is suffering greatly and has no chance to live. Only then can it be considered humane to kill the animal. A real man will do the killing himself - not take the animal to the vet which is another failure to live up to obligations. It is never humane to abandon a pet. It is never humane to regeg on your obligations to your pet. You willingly take on the obligation. It shows a lack of morals to change your mind. Too many people these days have no morals. They do whatever is most convenient at any given time but what disgusts me is they lie to themselves and attempt to justify this lack of morals with lame excuses that simply don't make any logical or moral sense. If my words can sway one opinion and save one animal they are worth it. I don't care what people think of me for writing these words. S.Simon - loves and respects animals "The Carrolls" wrote in message ... Boyoh boy, you must have hated recess when you were a kid. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... The Navigator's Lament I had a kitten and I loved her so much She was playful and gentle and so nice to touch. But alas she went blind And in my warped mind A handicapped cat might never survive And I fancied her better off dead than alive. So I KILLED her . . . S.Simon - loves animals |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lurker's Lament | ASA |