"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
I?


Maybe I meant Horvath?? I can hardly tell the difference between you these
days!



Regards


Donal
--

Bobsprit wrote:
would know that. Sony TRV-900, sliced using Final Cut Pro.

Welcome aboard. Don't flop about too much.

Kinda desperate, aint ya!
Sorry to have embarassed you so badly! You STILL couldn't tell the
diff between a still and a video frame!

I've never owned a video camera or even done video.


--
Wally
www.makearatherlonglinkthattakesyounowhere.com
Things are always clearer in the cold, post-upload light.

Sorry to have embarassed you so badly! You STILL couldn't tell the
diff between a still and a video frame!

I've never owned a video camera or even done video.

I doubt you've done much photography of any kind.
FYI, that pic was also taken with a Camedia. Set to automatic, and clamped to
the pulpit rail with a Gitzo extender. No big deal.
A video slice WOULD show blur and artifacts, dopey.
Good grief...what a pounding you're taking!

RB

Bobsprit wrote:
Sorry to have embarassed you so badly! You STILL couldn't tell the
diff between a still and a video frame!

I've never owned a video camera or even done video.

I doubt you've done much photography of any kind.
FYI, that pic was also taken with a Camedia. Set to automatic, and
clamped to the pulpit rail with a Gitzo extender. No big deal.
A video slice WOULD show blur and artifacts, dopey.

Sheesh! What an idiot! You're calling me "dopey" after I *didn't* make the
statement you're opposing! I didn't say video *would* have caused blurring,
fool!

What is the 35mm-equivalent focal length of this Camedia?


Good grief...what a pounding you're taking!

Take a look at your own manufactured 'victory' and keep pounding yourself.


--
Wally
www.makearatherlonglinkthattakesyounowhere.com
Things are always clearer in the cold, post-upload light.

Sheesh! What an idiot! You're calling me "dopey" after I *didn't* make the
statement you're opposing! I didn't say video *would* have caused blurring,
fool!

If you had a clue or brains to form a clue, you'd have realized that it
couldn't have been a video frame.
Sorry, you've now been overexposed as an idiot!

Bwahahahahaha!

RB

He's the one with breasts.

"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
I?


Maybe I meant Horvath?? I can hardly tell the difference between you
these
days!



Regards


Donal
--

"Bobsprit" wrote in message

| FYI, that pic was also taken with a Clamedia.

What a load of Clap... er I meant Crap!

CM

agreed most people over spend when 1 mega pix. is good
enough for the average user, not unless your into
major photo editing.

NH_/)_

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
I use a Kodak disposible camera. Good quality for $6 at WalMart. I've
been
thinking about going digital. What camera would you recommend for under
$50?

Scotty



"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
...
It certainly wasn't a Nikon F4 with a data-back... that's what I use.
Plus
ten grand in lenses. everything from a 17 Fisheye, 500 Catadioptric up
to
a
500 to 2000 telephoto zoom at F11 [okay it's really a 250 to 1000 at
F5.6
but with the Nikon 2x teleconverter....] Flashes and slaves... it
makes
the pros drool in envy.

CM

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
| Good lord, Wally. Give it up. You know nothing about photography.
You
| lost. Going sailing...enjoy your work-day!
|
| You mean you really did put a cheap teleconverter on the Nikon??
|
| Tell us again what you think was used to take the pic....
|
| RB

Who is that butt ugly woman driving? Must be Horass...

Is it Katy ?

NH_/)_

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

Katy is beautiful. It's Horass for sure.

"NH_/)_" wrote in message
om...
Who is that butt ugly woman driving? Must be Horass...

Is it Katy ?

NH_/)_

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message