Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
2-in-3 Can't Name Any Dem Candidate
September 2, 2003 Washington Times headline: "Enthusiasm for Democrats Low Poll Shows." Quote: "Labor Day weekend traditionally involves heavy presidential politicking, but a poll released yesterday shows that Democrats are off to a sluggish start as a large majority of voters are unable to name a single candidate." This, my friends, is a CBS/New York Times poll. Now, how can this be? We supposedly have this juggernaut out there of Howard Dean! The mainstream press tells us that Dean is about to take over. Dean is the favorite; he's rocking the political world. Mo "Half of those surveyed in this poll also said they wanted more choices than the current nine-candidate field. Two-thirds could not name one of the Democratic presidential candidates unprompted. Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut led the poll with 14%, followed by Gephardt with 11%, and Howard Dean with 10%." I'm telling you, the truth is that this party is in big trouble. The 2002 election was a harbinger of things to come, not an exception. Ave Imperator Bush! Bush Was Right! Four More Years! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Republican myths | General | |||
OT Liberals Democrats Like Hairball Harry | General | |||
OT- The Democrats' dilemma | General |