Bobsprit
 

"Wally" wrote in message
...
| Bobsprit wrote:
| Odd... you claimed a few days ago that you forgot to buy batteries...
| now
| you say you did buy them but lost them?
|
| Poor mooron. To much drinking. We forgot to BUY them in Port Jeff. I
| forget to BRING them on city Isle.
|
| You didn't forget to bring them, you lost them.

Kind of hard to keep up with Bob's ever-changing story line. Bob has
rewritten it so often it's become a confusing tangle of fabrications and
denials.

CM

Bobsprit
 

Capt. Mooron wrote:

You didn't forget to bring them, you lost them.

Kind of hard to keep up with Bob's ever-changing story line. Bob has
rewritten it so often it's become a confusing tangle of fabrications
and denials.

He consults his Big Book Of Refutations And Excuses, but has still to look
up 'consistency' in his dictionary.


--
Wally
www.makearatherlonglinkthattakesyounowhere.com
Things are always clearer in the cold, post-upload light.

Bobsprit
 

12300


RB.

Bobsprit
 

Bobsprit wrote:
12300

Fascinating. And the relevance of this to boat power and shore charging
systems is?


--
Wally
www.makearatherlonglinkthattakesyounowhere.com
Things are always clearer in the cold, post-upload light.

Bobsprit
 

but I'd very much like
to fit nav lights at least, so some sort of shoreside charging system would
be good. I'd rather think ahead and install a 12V system that's capable of
running some other kit further down the line (a depth sounder springs to
mind, and maybe a fixed VHF).

Fitting nav lights and a single 12v battery, such as a smaller group 24 will be
easy. You could also go with a larger grp. 27 and a small guest charger
hardwired in, so you just plug her in at day's end.
We have a laptop with DVD, but have been using the TV instead. The laptop
actually has a bigger screen and uses less power, but the tube set is easier to
use overall.

RB

Bobsprit
 

Bwahahahahahah. He's attempting to give an answer to the
number on the L.I.S. chart but he doesn't know the answer
doesn't have the chart obviously when he claimed he had
paper backups to his dead hand held GPS and he's so flustered
that he posted the wrong answer in the wrong place.

What a loser!

S.Simon


"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...


12300


RB.

Bobsprit
 

but has still to look
up 'consistency' in his dictionary.

Conisistency has no home here.

RB

Bobsprit
 

doesn't have the chart obviously when he claimed he had
paper backups to his dead hand held GPS and he's so flustered
that he posted the wrong answer in the wrong place.

i posted the correct answer...inthe wrong place. Flustered? Never happens.

RB

Bobsprit
 

You did not post the correct answer.

The correct answer is 12354 NOT 12300.

Bwahahahahahaha!


"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...
doesn't have the chart obviously when he claimed he had
paper backups to his dead hand held GPS and he's so flustered
that he posted the wrong answer in the wrong place.

i posted the correct answer...inthe wrong place. Flustered? Never happens.

RB

Bobsprit
 

You did not post the correct answer.

The correct answer is 12354 NOT 12300.

Sorry, Neal. The first page shows the entire coverage area and reads as
follows:
Reproduced from NOS chart no. 12300.
Since you failed to indicate a specific area, I chose that one.
try again!

RB