(Frank and Ronnie Maier) wrote in
om:

"Scout" wrote:
Isn't that an ultralight? Is a license required for it? Where did you
fly? My son is looking at ULs.

Hi, Scout,

Check out rec.aviation.ultralight. True ultralights (Part 104 legal)
have no licensing requirements; but it's still a "real" airplane

No they're not.

Bertei

"JaxAshby" wrote in
ink.net:

A buddy of mine was murdered a few years back. It seems the killer put
a several bricks in the tail of his 172. Got airborne and the tail
section didn't have enough lift, the plane fell backwards to the
ground.

My pre-flight always include a thorough poke around the inside of the
plane. Does yours?


what a fjukwit you are, Jaxhole.

Enough lift from the tailplane?


Bwawhahwhahwhahwhhahwhahwhahwhahwh!

Bertie

"Simple Simon" wrote in
:

I flew for two years and never once checked the inside of
my aircraft. There was no need to check the inside because
there was no inside.

It was a Rotec Rally2B. I bet you don't even know what
that is.

I'll bet nobody cares about your flittering lawn furniture either.

Bit of a stretch to call it an aircraft, BTW.


Bertie

S.Simon


"JaxAshby" wrote in message
ink.net...
A buddy of mine was murdered a few years back. It seems the killer
put a several bricks in the tail of his 172. Got airborne and the
tail section didn't have enough lift, the plane fell backwards to the
ground.

My pre-flight always include a thorough poke around the inside of the
plane. Does yours?

Jax

Horvath wrote in :

On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 20:06:22 GMT, "JaxAshby"
wrote this crap:

A buddy of mine was murdered a few years back. It seems the killer put
a several bricks in the tail of his 172. Got airborne and the tail
section didn't have enough lift, the plane fell backwards to the
ground.

My pre-flight always include a thorough poke around the inside of the
plane. Does yours?

Jax


My pre-flights consists of throwing my gear in the overhead, rifling
through the seatback for any good magazines, and checking out the
stewardesses.

I'm sure they check you out too.

Bertei

"JaxAshby" wrote
Did I tell you I used to be a stunt motorcyclist?

Scout wrote:

Jax,
Did you ever work with Evil Kneivel? My girlfriend's dad (mid 70's) was his
manager.
I've done some stunt work, but none of it was planned.
Scout

But...is this indeed Jax? There are too many worrying aspects,
not least of which is his syntax.


--
Flying Tadpole

-------------------------
Learn what lies below the waves of cyberspace!
http://www.internetopera.netfirms.com

On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 22:03:32 +0930, a team of surgeons from
alt.sailing.asa removed the following benign growth from Flying
Tadpole:

"JaxAshby" wrote
Did I tell you I used to be a stunt motorcyclist?

Scout wrote:

Jax,
Did you ever work with Evil Kneivel? My girlfriend's dad (mid 70's) was his
manager.
I've done some stunt work, but none of it was planned.
Scout

But...is this indeed Jax?

You people get better and better.

There are too many worrying aspects,
not least of which is his syntax.

It's probably too late for him to learn how to improve it.

I'm just hoping he can be discouraged from taking his clothes off in
public too often.

--
PJR :-)
mhm34x8

curses! trapus interruptus!
Scout

"Scout" wrote in
:

Jax,
Did you ever work with Evil Kneivel? My girlfriend's dad (mid 70's)
was his manager.
I've done some stunt work, but none of it was planned.

I beleive you.

Bertie

junk mail