Iraqi Agent Went To Niger In 1999

July 31, 2003




Terry Jeffrey, the editor of Human Events, reports a great story,
"Saddam Sent Trade Mission to Niger." Jeffrey went through the United
Nations Atomic Energy Agency records and found that they say Saddam
Hussein sent an ambassador named Al Zahawie on a trade mission to
Niger in 1999. As Jeffrey asks, "If Iraq’s emissary to Niger sought
trade, the implication is obvious: Did Saddam want Niger uranium, or
did he want Niger cows or cowpeas?"

The Iraqi nuclear hawk did, indeed, go to Niger in 1999. It's backup
that the British intelligence is right. What's that Iraqi nuclear hawk
doing in Niger? Niger is a uranium-exporting country. It's the primary
thing that Niger is known for.

So now, it has been discovered and even admitted to by Al Zahawie that
he went there in 1999, ostensibly on a trade mission, but this was a
move to arm Arab nations with nuclear capability because of the
imbalance of power, from their point of view, based on the possession
of such weapons by Israel. So this just gets even more frustrating.

There's no question that those 16 words in the president's State of
the Union were correct and there was no reason to apologize for saying
them. Saddam was trying to reconstitute his nuclear program - and he
was snooping around Africa trying to do it.







Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Beers!

And loose it. Here are the stats for just one mine.

License violations at Smith Ranch in-situ leaching site

* Feb. 9, 2003: 500 gallon spill of production fluid containing
about 2 mg/L of uranium
* Jul. 30, 2002: 1,480 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Apr. 25, 2002: 3,500 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Apr. 24, 2002: 18,000 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Jan. 4, 2002: 1,800 gallon spill of production fluid containing
about 18 ppm U308
* Dec. 5, 2001: 3,600 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Oct. 22, 2001: 62,400 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Jun. 18, 2001: 1,100 gallon spill of deep well disposal fluid
* Nov. 22, 2000: 1,870 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Oct. 22, 2000: 11,100 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Aug. 7, 2000: 780 gallon spill of production fluid
* Feb. 26, 2000: 3,780 gallon spill of production fluid
* Jan. 17, 2000: 6,900 gallon spill of production fluid



Cheers MC

Horvath wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 00:17:09 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote this crap:


Horvath wrote in :


Iraqi Agent Went To Niger In 1999

and where does bush get his nuke material?


Are you stupid? We make our own.




Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Beers!

Oobie Doobie wrote in
:

Fartingmor

I attended Fartingmor before I was accepted into Bungmunch U.

--
Can I borrow a feeling?
http://www.mp3.com/gortician

Bass for your anus:
http://www.mp3.com/manticore
http://www.mp3.com/meterversusyard
http://www.mp3.com/highc
http://www.mp3.com/measurerecs.

"[The artwork of Andrew Penland] is REAL...what I mean by "real" is that it
made NEW THOUGHTS occur in my head, which would have never otherwise
occurred." --Full Force Frank

Remove the "injection fluid" spills; they're barren of any
uranium.
The "deep well disposal fluid" will have next to no uranium in it
(It may have radium).

So the spills with uranium in them amount to
500+1,800+780+3,780+6,900=13760 gals, call it 55,000L, at 2mg/l,
call it 110 grams of Uranium.

Now throw away the inert U isotope of that 110 gms and we're left
with, let's really really overstate this, say 10mg lost over 3
years. (less than 1/2oz, for the non-metrics).

Whilst there might be some hazard if you ate it all at once, I
think it would take a long long time to put your bomb together,
MC. NOW, if it were ARSENIC you could do soooooooo much more,
but arsenic's no longer sexy cos it's not radioactive.

You're welcome.

The navigator© wrote:

And loose it. Here are the stats for just one mine.

License violations at Smith Ranch in-situ leaching site

* Feb. 9, 2003: 500 gallon spill of production fluid containing
about 2 mg/L of uranium
* Jul. 30, 2002: 1,480 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Apr. 25, 2002: 3,500 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Apr. 24, 2002: 18,000 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Jan. 4, 2002: 1,800 gallon spill of production fluid containing
about 18 ppm U308
* Dec. 5, 2001: 3,600 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Oct. 22, 2001: 62,400 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Jun. 18, 2001: 1,100 gallon spill of deep well disposal fluid
* Nov. 22, 2000: 1,870 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Oct. 22, 2000: 11,100 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Aug. 7, 2000: 780 gallon spill of production fluid
* Feb. 26, 2000: 3,780 gallon spill of production fluid
* Jan. 17, 2000: 6,900 gallon spill of production fluid

Cheers MC

Horvath wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 00:17:09 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote this crap:


Horvath wrote in :


Iraqi Agent Went To Niger In 1999

and where does bush get his nuke material?


Are you stupid? We make our own.




Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Beers!

--
Flying Tadpole

-------------------------
Learn what lies below the waves of cyberspace!
http://www.internetopera.netfirms.com

How did 110 grams turn into 10 mg? What uranium isotope is not radioactive?

Cheers MC

Flying Tadpole wrote:

Remove the "injection fluid" spills; they're barren of any
uranium.
The "deep well disposal fluid" will have next to no uranium in it
(It may have radium).

So the spills with uranium in them amount to
500+1,800+780+3,780+6,900=13760 gals, call it 55,000L, at 2mg/l,
call it 110 grams of Uranium.

Now throw away the inert U isotope of that 110 gms and we're left
with, let's really really overstate this, say 10mg lost over 3
years. (less than 1/2oz, for the non-metrics).

Whilst there might be some hazard if you ate it all at once, I
think it would take a long long time to put your bomb together,
MC. NOW, if it were ARSENIC you could do soooooooo much more,
but arsenic's no longer sexy cos it's not radioactive.

You're welcome.

The navigator© wrote:

And loose it. Here are the stats for just one mine.

License violations at Smith Ranch in-situ leaching site

* Feb. 9, 2003: 500 gallon spill of production fluid containing
about 2 mg/L of uranium
* Jul. 30, 2002: 1,480 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Apr. 25, 2002: 3,500 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Apr. 24, 2002: 18,000 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Jan. 4, 2002: 1,800 gallon spill of production fluid containing
about 18 ppm U308
* Dec. 5, 2001: 3,600 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Oct. 22, 2001: 62,400 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Jun. 18, 2001: 1,100 gallon spill of deep well disposal fluid
* Nov. 22, 2000: 1,870 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Oct. 22, 2000: 11,100 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Aug. 7, 2000: 780 gallon spill of production fluid
* Feb. 26, 2000: 3,780 gallon spill of production fluid
* Jan. 17, 2000: 6,900 gallon spill of production fluid

Cheers MC

Horvath wrote:

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 00:17:09 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote this crap:



Horvath wrote in :



Iraqi Agent Went To Niger In 1999

and where does bush get his nuke material?


Are you stupid? We make our own.




Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Beers!

Sorry, the overstatement should have read 10gm (ie about 10%)as
indicated by the less than 1/2oz comment. The 10gm is still a
gross overstatement. Re your second question, you can't be
serious, surely...

FT

The navigator© wrote:

How did 110 grams turn into 10 mg? What uranium isotope is not radioactive?

Cheers MC

Flying Tadpole wrote:

Remove the "injection fluid" spills; they're barren of any
uranium.
The "deep well disposal fluid" will have next to no uranium in it
(It may have radium).

So the spills with uranium in them amount to
500+1,800+780+3,780+6,900=13760 gals, call it 55,000L, at 2mg/l,
call it 110 grams of Uranium.

Now throw away the inert U isotope of that 110 gms and we're left
with, let's really really overstate this, say 10mg lost over 3
years. (less than 1/2oz, for the non-metrics).

Whilst there might be some hazard if you ate it all at once, I
think it would take a long long time to put your bomb together,
MC. NOW, if it were ARSENIC you could do soooooooo much more,
but arsenic's no longer sexy cos it's not radioactive.

You're welcome.

The navigator© wrote:

And loose it. Here are the stats for just one mine.

License violations at Smith Ranch in-situ leaching site

* Feb. 9, 2003: 500 gallon spill of production fluid containing
about 2 mg/L of uranium
* Jul. 30, 2002: 1,480 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Apr. 25, 2002: 3,500 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Apr. 24, 2002: 18,000 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Jan. 4, 2002: 1,800 gallon spill of production fluid containing
about 18 ppm U308
* Dec. 5, 2001: 3,600 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Oct. 22, 2001: 62,400 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Jun. 18, 2001: 1,100 gallon spill of deep well disposal fluid
* Nov. 22, 2000: 1,870 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Oct. 22, 2000: 11,100 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Aug. 7, 2000: 780 gallon spill of production fluid
* Feb. 26, 2000: 3,780 gallon spill of production fluid
* Jan. 17, 2000: 6,900 gallon spill of production fluid

Cheers MC

Horvath wrote:

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 00:17:09 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote this crap:



Horvath wrote in :



Iraqi Agent Went To Niger In 1999

and where does bush get his nuke material?


Are you stupid? We make our own.




Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Beers!

No just testing. I've got some!

Cheers MC

Flying Tadpole wrote:

Sorry, the overstatement should have read 10gm (ie about 10%)as
indicated by the less than 1/2oz comment. The 10gm is still a
gross overstatement. Re your second question, you can't be
serious, surely...

FT

The navigator© wrote:

How did 110 grams turn into 10 mg? What uranium isotope is not radioactive?

Cheers MC

Flying Tadpole wrote:


Remove the "injection fluid" spills; they're barren of any
uranium.
The "deep well disposal fluid" will have next to no uranium in it
(It may have radium).

So the spills with uranium in them amount to
500+1,800+780+3,780+6,900=13760 gals, call it 55,000L, at 2mg/l,
call it 110 grams of Uranium.

Now throw away the inert U isotope of that 110 gms and we're left
with, let's really really overstate this, say 10mg lost over 3
years. (less than 1/2oz, for the non-metrics).

Whilst there might be some hazard if you ate it all at once, I
think it would take a long long time to put your bomb together,
MC. NOW, if it were ARSENIC you could do soooooooo much more,
but arsenic's no longer sexy cos it's not radioactive.

You're welcome.

The navigator© wrote:


And loose it. Here are the stats for just one mine.

License violations at Smith Ranch in-situ leaching site

* Feb. 9, 2003: 500 gallon spill of production fluid containing
about 2 mg/L of uranium
* Jul. 30, 2002: 1,480 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Apr. 25, 2002: 3,500 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Apr. 24, 2002: 18,000 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Jan. 4, 2002: 1,800 gallon spill of production fluid containing
about 18 ppm U308
* Dec. 5, 2001: 3,600 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Oct. 22, 2001: 62,400 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Jun. 18, 2001: 1,100 gallon spill of deep well disposal fluid
* Nov. 22, 2000: 1,870 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Oct. 22, 2000: 11,100 gallon spill of injection fluid
* Aug. 7, 2000: 780 gallon spill of production fluid
* Feb. 26, 2000: 3,780 gallon spill of production fluid
* Jan. 17, 2000: 6,900 gallon spill of production fluid

Cheers MC

Horvath wrote:


On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 00:17:09 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote this crap:




Horvath wrote in :




Iraqi Agent Went To Niger In 1999

and where does bush get his nuke material?


Are you stupid? We make our own.




Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Beers!