Nik wrote in
:


I'd laugh if it wasn't so tragically self-hating.


Aww, don't hate yourslef Njikky.

Kind of a waste of effort when so many are doing the job for you.

Bertie

"RogueXV" wrote in
:

That's a very good question my friend. I'll let you know when I find
out.


You have only to ask, fjuckwit.

Bertie

"Philip Crookes" wrote in message
...
Why was this crossposted to a New Zealand newsgroup?


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .
Nik wrote in
:

On 30 Jul 2003 09:58:32 +0200, Falcon falcon AT nym DOT
irishgroups DOT com wrote:

"Nik" wrote in message
. ..
On 29 Jul 2003 18:29:33 +0100, "Keith Mills"
wrote:

You reckon that that Census was accurate and professionally
done and yet you're telling Republicans and Nationalists to
wise up...?

There's something particularly ridiculous about a SF/IRA
supporter complaining about accuracy and professionalism.

You're easily amused.

The Census regulations are clear and publicly available. The
Census methodology is both transparent and statistically sound
and, where adjustment of Census results were made for people who
were missed by the Census or failed to return a Census form,
failed to answer a question, answered inconsistently or answered
incorrectly, both the adjustments and the methodology used are
clearly and professionally explained. The decision to address
these issues was noted in the White Paper preceding the Census
(Cm 4253, published 1999).

And the assignation of religious affiliation being changed by the
the postal code when respondents claimed 'no religious
affiliation' was professional and an accurate representation of
fact?

There's no conspiracy,

You expect me to believe that don't you?

nothing was, or is hidden and there's no mystery.
You just don't like the results .... and your complaints, like
your complaints about measures introduced to combat the
fraudulent manipulation of the electoral roll, are vague,
uninformed, hysterical and politically motivated.

A claim can still be vague, uninformed, hystrerical, politically
motivated and true nonetheless.

http://www.nisra.gov.uk/Census/pdf/C...egulations.pdf

http://www.nisra.gov.uk/Census/censu...2001methodolog
ypaper.html#introduction

Census results in Excel format:

http://www.nisra.gov.uk/census/Censu...d_tables_ni.ht
ml#Northern%20Ireland

Got your "sniper at work" badge yet Nik?

What I have or don't have is none of your business. Do you?


So, you admit to sniping.

Do they let you smoke dope while you're sniping?

Bertie

Nik wrote in
:

On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 13:28:35 +0100, Chesney Christ
wrote:

A certain Nik, of soc.culture.irish "fame", writes :
On Sat, 2 Aug 2003 23:33:53 +0100, Chesney Christ
wrote:

A certain Nik, of soc.culture.irish "fame", writes :

That's a lot of old waffly bollox. What exact outcome do you see ?

A reunified Ireland within a European Community without British troops
patrolling the streets.

This will stem from an election ?

Yes, yes it will.

??

After the election the troops will mysteriously fade away ?

Not the currently postponed one, not directly anyway,

In other words, an imaginary one in the distant future, and not the one
we're talking about right now.

but yes, I
expect a compromise solution to come about as the result

Back to square one. What's this compromise of yours ?

I've just seen this...I don't have time right now to answer it fully
but, I would imagine, it would be an extension, of sorts, where in the
medium term future, Britain joins the Euro, the idea of a border
between the six counties and Ireland becomes increasingly meaningless,
people on the Island of Ireland continue in the "Personal choice to
self-identify as Irish or British ala GFA" vein and the British troops
go home...

Something like that...more later..


Yeah, then your nazi buddy Dirk can take over even more area, eh njkky?

Bertie