| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
LOL...Neal, you have never been able to show any logical proof, or legal
proof to back up your claims about situations in fog. In all honesty, you've never even been able to use the wording of the rules, to show justification for your views. I especially find it interesting that you always conveniently disappear or stop posting, whenever the subject of a powerdriven vessel (engaged in towing) and a sailing vessel making the same signal, in fog, arises. ..... i.e. you are totally unable to verify, prove, explain, document, etc. any of your self professed nonsense. You keep spouting about your license (is it current?)....personally, all your license has ever proved to me, is that a "license" is no guarantee as to a person's ability or professionalism .... you possess neither. I did not expect you to try or in any way be able, to answer Shen's questions and "kicker" about the tug in fog ..... your experience level (as has become even more obvious with your statement about visibility in fog) is on the low end of the "totem pole" .... problem is .... your abilities appear even lower. The only purpose you serve, in discussing "Rules" questions, is to show others how easily the "rules" can be misinterpreted and how not knowing their meaning and/or intent can lead to possible serious problems, from viewing your responses. otn Simple Simon wrote: I tried my best to clue that clueless pair in on the facts of the matter when it comes to the practical aspects of the Rules and how they apply to sailboats but to no avail. I'm afraid trying to instruct Shen44 and Jeff is like teaching a special education class for Down's syndrome children. Their attention span is way to short and their IQ is way too limited. They even attempted to start a discussion of court cases and we all know there isn't a judge in the world who knows what sailing is all about. The bottom line and unfortunate fact is motorboat Captains like Shen44 and Jeff have a mentality that makes it dangerous for them to operate large motor boats. There is no telling how many small boats they have run down because of their insistence that might makes right. What kind of a fool does it take to deny there is a pecking order in a fog when there is one signal for a motor vessel and another different signal for sailboats, and those above sailboats in the pecking order. The fact of the matter is upon hearing one prolonged and two short blasts a motor boat captain must assume the worst. He must assume he is hearing the signal of a NUC until more information becomes available. Since a NUC, by definition has some sort of mechanical or operational problem that makes it impossible for it maneuver according to the Rules the motor vessel operator knows the Rules require him to avoid causing a close quarters situation. In other words the motor vessel must give way and that makes the motor vessel the give way vessel. When there is a give way vessel there is a pecking order. End of sentence. Period. End of discussion. I have stated the facts in the above paragraph until I am blue in the typing fingers and the dense duo cannot get it through their thick skulls that they are wrong and I am right. There comes a point when it becomes pointless to continue a discussion with such morons and dunderheads as Jeff and Shen44. Until and unless I ever meet them in person where I can pound some sense into their block heads and kick their scrawny asses halfway across the barroom they will have to remain stupid and ignorant. S.Simon "otnmbrd" wrote in message k.net... EG See you bailed out of the "Rules" thread, when things got too hard on ya ..... alas, twas expected..... |