Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
See, Bobsprit, how a real troll master does it.
Your trolling efforts only result in people doing minor work typing some insults in reply to your taunts while my expert trolls result in people spending all night reading books and doing math .. .. . . . I'm the master. Bwaa ah ahah ha ha hhahaha! "CANDChelp" wrote in message ... The original calculation yielded 4.9 knots, so there is a net loss. In lighter wind he has more wetted surface, and although his ultimate hull speed may be higher, he has to carry full sail in well over 20 knots to get there. The 20 knot prediction leaves him at 1.2 sqrt(LWL), or 6 knots, instead of 6.3. As neal says, math tells the truth. RB |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Whacky design thought | General | |||
Threats to lakes grow faster than cures: More bad news | General | |||
Another happy Coronado owner checks in. | ASA | |||
Faster than fast...? | ASA | |||
Just when you thought it was safe . . .. | ASA |