| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
You're right - you lost considerable freeeboard aft. Is your transom supposed to be
underwater? Before you start "spending" your extra speed, remember that Waterline does not automatically produce speed. If your LWL was increased by adding 2000 pounds displacement (that only lowers you 3 inches) then your displacement went from 6200 to 8200, which drops your SA/disp down to a dismal 10.7! While your ultimate speed may be faster, your medium air performance is now pathetic. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... I think the original figure is with an empty boat that floats much higher up in the water. Even then I think the LWL would be greater than 22 feet, though. Another thing is the shoal keel is about five hundred pounds heaver than the stantard keel so mine, which is a shoal keel, floats deeper in the water to begin with even when not loaded for cruising and living aboard. "Wally" wrote in message ... "Simple Simon" wrote in message Finally, a voice of reason. Thank you Wally. Can't argue with the numbers. If the 22' is an original Coronado spec, I can only assume that it was a typo or a misreading of a handwritten note. What amazes me is that nobody thought to question it until now. You must have had one of those "wait a minute, that's not right..." moments. -- Wally I demand rigidly-defined areas of uncertainty! www.art-gallery.myby.co.uk |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Whacky design thought | General | |||
| Threats to lakes grow faster than cures: More bad news | General | |||
| Another happy Coronado owner checks in. | ASA | |||
| Faster than fast...? | ASA | |||
| Just when you thought it was safe . . .. | ASA | |||