"Simple Simon" wrote in message

I think the original figure is with an empty boat that floats
much higher up in the water. Even then I think the LWL
would be greater than 22 feet, though.

I would agree with that - 3 feet is a lot to lose. Looking at the port-side
view on...

http://captneal.homestead.com/haulout.html

....I estimate 22 feet from the stern to end somewhere between the stand
under the bow and the dark object in the background just to its left.


Another thing is
the shoal keel is about five hundred pounds heaver
than the stantard keel so mine, which is a shoal keel,
floats deeper in the water to begin with even when not
loaded for cruising and living aboard.

Does the line of your blue antifoul leave the same nominal freeboard as
Coronado 27s with the standard keel?


--
Wally
I demand rigidly-defined areas of uncertainty!
www.art-gallery.myby.co.uk

I've raised the boot stripe about 8 inches over the years.


"Wally" wrote in message ...
"Simple Simon" wrote in message

I think the original figure is with an empty boat that floats
much higher up in the water. Even then I think the LWL
would be greater than 22 feet, though.

I would agree with that - 3 feet is a lot to lose. Looking at the port-side
view on...

http://captneal.homestead.com/haulout.html

...I estimate 22 feet from the stern to end somewhere between the stand
under the bow and the dark object in the background just to its left.


Another thing is
the shoal keel is about five hundred pounds heaver
than the stantard keel so mine, which is a shoal keel,
floats deeper in the water to begin with even when not
loaded for cruising and living aboard.

Does the line of your blue antifoul leave the same nominal freeboard as
Coronado 27s with the standard keel?


--
Wally
I demand rigidly-defined areas of uncertainty!
www.art-gallery.myby.co.uk