![]() |
Coronado 27 faster than I thought.
Hahahaha! Perhaps the problem is is in the LOA?
Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: FEAR THIS! Now I understand why my boat is so uncommonly fast. It is because she has a LWL of 25 feet instead of the commonly listed 22 feet. You can see and measure for yourself http://captneal.homestead.com/Sheshines.html Use the top picture and get out your dividers. Measure the LOA. You computer screen size will make your measurments vary from mine but not too worry use what you get. The LOA I measured at 27 feet is 12.5mm The LWL I measured at X is 11.6mm. Now all we have to do is solve for X X times 12.5 = 27 times 11.6 or X = (27) (11.6) divided by 12.5 or X = 25 feet. With a LWL of 25 feet the hull speed is the same as Moroon's 30-footer and Booby's 32 footer. A picture is worth a thousand words. |
Coronado 27 faster than I thought.
No, LWL is a straight line measurement just like LOA.
"Wally" wrote in message ... "Simple Simon" wrote in message LWL is measured in a straight line from the water at the bow to the water at the stern. LOA is measured from the stem fitting (not the plow anchor, mind you) to the transom at its longest point in a straight line. Isn't the LWL measured from stem to stern along the path that the water takes? Hence, for a given 'straight' LWL, a beamy boat would have a slightly longer LWL than a narrower boat. Of course, this would mean that an estimate based on a straight line measurement would be slightly short. -- Wally I demand rigidly-defined areas of uncertainty! www.art-gallery.myby.co.uk |
Coronado 27 faster than I thought.
"Simple Simon" wrote in message
I think the original figure is with an empty boat that floats much higher up in the water. Even then I think the LWL would be greater than 22 feet, though. I would agree with that - 3 feet is a lot to lose. Looking at the port-side view on... http://captneal.homestead.com/haulout.html ....I estimate 22 feet from the stern to end somewhere between the stand under the bow and the dark object in the background just to its left. Another thing is the shoal keel is about five hundred pounds heaver than the stantard keel so mine, which is a shoal keel, floats deeper in the water to begin with even when not loaded for cruising and living aboard. Does the line of your blue antifoul leave the same nominal freeboard as Coronado 27s with the standard keel? -- Wally I demand rigidly-defined areas of uncertainty! www.art-gallery.myby.co.uk |
Coronado 27 faster than I thought.
"Simple Simon" wrote in message
No, LWL is a straight line measurement just like LOA. Yup, some subsequent Googling confirms - cheers. -- Wally I demand rigidly-defined areas of uncertainty! www.art-gallery.myby.co.uk |
Coronado 27 faster than I thought.
Maybe you could sink it to the gunwhales and it'd be as fast as a
26.6" LWL yacht? Ozzy, go to sleep NOW. You can't say anything funnier than what you wrote above! RB |
NO, NO, NO!!!!
LOA (Length Over All) is a measurement from the tip of the bow, around the
edge of the deck - as in toerail - , to the edge of the stern). LOD (Length Over Deck) is the straight line measurement you describe. Therefore, two 30' yachts, one with a 12' beam and the other with a 10' beam will have different LOD's! "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... No, LWL is a straight line measurement just like LOA. "Wally" wrote in message ... "Simple Simon" wrote in message LWL is measured in a straight line from the water at the bow to the water at the stern. LOA is measured from the stem fitting (not the plow anchor, mind you) to the transom at its longest point in a straight line. Isn't the LWL measured from stem to stern along the path that the water takes? Hence, for a given 'straight' LWL, a beamy boat would have a slightly longer LWL than a narrower boat. Of course, this would mean that an estimate based on a straight line measurement would be slightly short. -- Wally I demand rigidly-defined areas of uncertainty! www.art-gallery.myby.co.uk |
Coronado 27 faster than I thought.
You're right - you lost considerable freeeboard aft. Is your transom supposed to be
underwater? Before you start "spending" your extra speed, remember that Waterline does not automatically produce speed. If your LWL was increased by adding 2000 pounds displacement (that only lowers you 3 inches) then your displacement went from 6200 to 8200, which drops your SA/disp down to a dismal 10.7! While your ultimate speed may be faster, your medium air performance is now pathetic. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... I think the original figure is with an empty boat that floats much higher up in the water. Even then I think the LWL would be greater than 22 feet, though. Another thing is the shoal keel is about five hundred pounds heaver than the stantard keel so mine, which is a shoal keel, floats deeper in the water to begin with even when not loaded for cruising and living aboard. "Wally" wrote in message ... "Simple Simon" wrote in message Finally, a voice of reason. Thank you Wally. Can't argue with the numbers. If the 22' is an original Coronado spec, I can only assume that it was a typo or a misreading of a handwritten note. What amazes me is that nobody thought to question it until now. You must have had one of those "wait a minute, that's not right..." moments. -- Wally I demand rigidly-defined areas of uncertainty! www.art-gallery.myby.co.uk |
NO, NO, NO!!!!
"Ghost" wrote in message news:MR%Ta.20524
LOA (Length Over All) is a measurement from the tip of the bow, around the edge of the deck - as in toerail - , to the edge of the stern). LOD (Length Over Deck) is the straight line measurement you describe. a.. Length Overall (LOA): The extreme length of the ship along the centerline is called the length overall. See: URL: http://web.nps.navy.mil/~me/tsse/Nav...le2/basics.htm -- Wally I demand rigidly-defined areas of uncertainty! www.art-gallery.myby.co.uk |
Coronado 27 faster than I thought.
PHRF So Cal rates your boat at 228, which makes it slower than a Catalina
27, Pearson 25, Cal 27, even a lowly Mac26x!!! A quick examination of the list revealed only 2 slower 27 footers, an Ericson and a Tartan, both of which are miles ahead of your boat, quality wise, that is. Also C&C, O'Day, and probably a few others I've missed, speed wise, that is. http://www.phrfsocal.org/ The thing about the ratings for older boats is that they tend to be a little more accurate as these boats have been around for a while and if they are faster than their ratings indicate they usually get adjusted to reflect this.228 is about as fast as any Coronado 26 will ever get, including yours. I think the thing that would be really humiliating would be to get beat by a Mac26x! John Cairns "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... FEAR THIS! Now I understand why my boat is so uncommonly fast. It is because she has a LWL of 25 feet instead of the commonly listed 22 feet. You can see and measure for yourself http://captneal.homestead.com/Sheshines.html Use the top picture and get out your dividers. Measure the LOA. You computer screen size will make your measurments vary from mine but not too worry use what you get. The LOA I measured at 27 feet is 12.5mm The LWL I measured at X is 11.6mm. Now all we have to do is solve for X X times 12.5 = 27 times 11.6 or X = (27) (11.6) divided by 12.5 or X = 25 feet. With a LWL of 25 feet the hull speed is the same as Moroon's 30-footer and Booby's 32 footer. A picture is worth a thousand words. |
NO, NO, NO!!!!
That's silly. Are you saying my cat's LOA is 9 feet longer?
I can find a number of sources that say LOA is straight line, not around the side. Here's one: http://www.docksidereports.com/boat_specifications.htm The measurement your talking about may play some part in a handicap rule, but it certainly isn't used in builders' specs. "Ghost" wrote in message . .. LOA (Length Over All) is a measurement from the tip of the bow, around the edge of the deck - as in toerail - , to the edge of the stern). LOD (Length Over Deck) is the straight line measurement you describe. Therefore, two 30' yachts, one with a 12' beam and the other with a 10' beam will have different LOD's! "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... No, LWL is a straight line measurement just like LOA. "Wally" wrote in message ... "Simple Simon" wrote in message LWL is measured in a straight line from the water at the bow to the water at the stern. LOA is measured from the stem fitting (not the plow anchor, mind you) to the transom at its longest point in a straight line. Isn't the LWL measured from stem to stern along the path that the water takes? Hence, for a given 'straight' LWL, a beamy boat would have a slightly longer LWL than a narrower boat. Of course, this would mean that an estimate based on a straight line measurement would be slightly short. -- Wally I demand rigidly-defined areas of uncertainty! www.art-gallery.myby.co.uk |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com