Simple Simon wrote:

So, you are willing to accept 3000 Americans butchered up
ala the WTC/Pentagon attack every year, two years, three years?

No, but that doesn't mean one agree with The Shrub's solution.

Fact is the decision to attack Saddam's government had nothing what so
ever to do with U.S. security; it was all about *Israeli* security.
There is no evidence Saddam planned or sponsored any attack on the US,
but there is ample proof he sponsored suicide attacks on Israel, both by
providing "vests" and pensions to bombers' dependents. Whether we should
fight Israel's battles for them is, of course, debatable; especially
when the 9/11 attacks were the result of that policy. But don't expect
any changes so long as we have the best policy-makers money can buy (c:
Worry about sailing instead.

Regards
Howard

Anti-Semite Vito. Shut-up you Spic!


"Vito" wrote in message ...
Simple Simon wrote:

So, you are willing to accept 3000 Americans butchered up
ala the WTC/Pentagon attack every year, two years, three years?

No, but that doesn't mean one agree with The Shrub's solution.

Fact is the decision to attack Saddam's government had nothing what so
ever to do with U.S. security; it was all about *Israeli* security.
There is no evidence Saddam planned or sponsored any attack on the US,
but there is ample proof he sponsored suicide attacks on Israel, both by
providing "vests" and pensions to bombers' dependents. Whether we should
fight Israel's battles for them is, of course, debatable; especially
when the 9/11 attacks were the result of that policy. But don't expect
any changes so long as we have the best policy-makers money can buy (c:
Worry about sailing instead.

Regards
Howard

The only real compelling argument I've heard for the War is the (admittedly remote)
possibility that a stable Arab democracy could serve as an example that would defuse the
tension in the Middle East.

There. My political post for the year.


"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
Anti-Semite Vito. Shut-up you Spic!


"Vito" wrote in message ...
Simple Simon wrote:

So, you are willing to accept 3000 Americans butchered up
ala the WTC/Pentagon attack every year, two years, three years?

No, but that doesn't mean one agree with The Shrub's solution.

Fact is the decision to attack Saddam's government had nothing what so
ever to do with U.S. security; it was all about *Israeli* security.
There is no evidence Saddam planned or sponsored any attack on the US,
but there is ample proof he sponsored suicide attacks on Israel, both by
providing "vests" and pensions to bombers' dependents. Whether we should
fight Israel's battles for them is, of course, debatable; especially
when the 9/11 attacks were the result of that policy. But don't expect
any changes so long as we have the best policy-makers money can buy (c:
Worry about sailing instead.

Regards
Howard